Irani
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2010
- Messages
- 54
- Reaction score
- 0
Let's assume that what you claimed is true, then would you please explain to me why they used Abomb in Nagasaki a day later? Wasn't the first bomb on Hiroshima enough? why they used two different kind of bombs, Uranium and plutonium? any clue? Why they used it on cities? and as the last question, How many casualties they prevented by avoiding Operation Downfall? this much:Have you an idea what bloodbath would have ensued if nukes wouldn't have been used? At least a million -Allied- casualties and total annihilation of the Japanese mainland and its people. Yes, it is a cold heated thing to say but one of the biggest horrors in history was averted.
70,000–80,000 people, or some 30%[34] of the population of Hiroshima were killed immediately, and another 70,000 injured.[35] Over 90% of the doctors and 93% of the nurses in Hiroshima were killed or injured—most had been in the downtown area which received the greatest damage.[36]
in Nagasaki:
Casualty estimates for immediate deaths range from 40,000 to 75,000.[64][65][66] Total deaths by the end of 1945 may have reached 80,000.
Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Indeed the Japanese did horrible things but what about children, women and civilians? what is the difference between their genocides and American's? Does the wrong act of others justify ours?