Nuclear Pakistan has destabilising effects: US expert

[Path-Finder]

I expected a Anglo american wench writing this article but what the f#ck was this an utter disgrace.

 

[Laozi]

You do know this comment can apply to any nation with nuclear weapons?

Americans have different set of rules for itself while another set of rules for friendly countries and completely different rules for enemy countries.

Comments made by Americans analyst will always be coloured by current policies of U.S.

 

[Thəorətic Muslim]

Comments made by Americans analyst will always be coloured by current policies of U.S.

I hate to break it to you, just because this lives in America doesn' make him an American.

 

[Laozi]

I hate to break it to you, just because this lives in America doesn' make him an American.

What he wrote sure looks like, he is pursuing the current American Anti-Pakistan policy.

BTW people generally acquire American culture and practices along with accent even during a short stay in U.S.

 

[risingsinga]

Pakistan's nuclear program is destabilizing
Iran's nuclear program is destabilizing
North Korea's nuclear program is destabilizing
But US nuclear program is NOT destabilizing

Yes uncle Sam you are right...

 

[WaLeEdK2]

Same rants over and over again. They're still living in the past

 

[My-Analogous]

Nuclear Pakistan has destabilising effects: US expert


Nuclear weapons in Pakistan's hands have "corrosively destabilising" effects in the region and provide a license for the country's sub-conventional wars against India, a top American expert has said.

"Unfortunately nuclear weapons in Pakistani hands have had larger and more corrosively destabilising effects: they have enabled Pakistan to pursue its revanchist aims of recovering the disputed state of Jammu and Kashmir by force, or more specifically, by unleashing state-supported terrorism against India in the hope of weakening Indian control over the contested territories," said Ashley Tellis from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

In an interview to The Cipher Brief, Tellis said this stratagem is based on the assumption that India will be unable to retaliate against Pakistan conventionally for fear of sparking a nuclear holocaust.

"Pakistan's nuclear weapons, then, are intended not merely to provide deterrence against Indian attacks, but more ambitiously, a license for Pakistan's sub-conventional wars against India," Tellis said in response to a question.

"This behaviour, flowing from Pakistan's possession of nuclear weapons, is what makes deterrence in South Asia more unstable than it would otherwise be— if Pakistan's strategic objectives were as conservative as India's," he said.

© pti Pakistan's Shaheen II nuclear-capable missile. In terms of estimated warhead production, Pakistan can produce anywhere from 14-27 warheads annually, whereas India can only produce 2-5 warheads per year (Source: AP Photo)
This dynamic, in its totality, suggests that India's approach to nuclear deterrence is closer to that of the United States: both nations view their nuclear weapons primarily as deterrents against nuclear attacks by others, he observed.

"Pakistan's behaviour, however, exemplifies nuclear coercion rather than simply deterrence: to that degree, it mimics Russian behaviour more than it does the US practice of deterrence," Tellis said.

In a separate paper, Will Edwards, International Producer with The Cipher Brief, said Pakistan has long viewed nuclear weapons as a hedge against Indian aggression in disputed territories and a counterweight to India's conventional military superiority.


The difference is that now Pakistan has chosen to outstrip India's nuclear forces by drastically increasing fissile materials production and to employ smaller, tactical nuclear devices in a bid to counteract India's widening conventional supremacy, he wrote.

Currently, Pakistan out produces India in fissile material at a ratio of 4:1.

In terms of estimated warhead production, Pakistan can produce anywhere from 14-27 warheads annually, whereas India can only produce 2-5 warheads per year, he said.

http://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world...-effects-us-expert/ar-BBtvoRI?ocid=spartandhp

We love destabilized Pakistan then Stable ME, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan etc etc. Please leave us alone

 

[Taimoor Khan]

******* indians as usual....

View attachment 307045

Motherf**** is butt ugly. No wonder. "American expert"!! RIGHT! LOL

I dont know why the hell yanks are allowing these Indian prostitutes their podium and present them as Americans? If Americans are openly hostile to Pakistan that they are letting Pakistan mortal enemies use their resources and influence to malign Pakistan, then bloody just declare Pakistan as enemy state and we will go our ways.

 

[Path-Finder]

******* indians as usual....

View attachment 307045

Thanks a Bunch I will now whats app this cheap indian stunt to humor my pals

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Nuclear Pakistan has destabilising effects: US expert


Nuclear weapons in Pakistan's hands have "corrosively destabilising" effects in the region and provide a license for the country's sub-conventional wars against India, a top American expert has said.

"Unfortunately nuclear weapons in Pakistani hands have had larger and more corrosively destabilising effects: they have enabled Pakistan to pursue its revanchist aims of recovering the disputed state of Jammu and Kashmir by force, or more specifically, by unleashing state-supported terrorism against India in the hope of weakening Indian control over the contested territories," said Ashley Tellis from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

In an interview to The Cipher Brief, Tellis said this stratagem is based on the assumption that India will be unable to retaliate against Pakistan conventionally for fear of sparking a nuclear holocaust.

"Pakistan's nuclear weapons, then, are intended not merely to provide deterrence against Indian attacks, but more ambitiously, a license for Pakistan's sub-conventional wars against India," Tellis said in response to a question.

"This behaviour, flowing from Pakistan's possession of nuclear weapons, is what makes deterrence in South Asia more unstable than it would otherwise be— if Pakistan's strategic objectives were as conservative as India's," he said.

© pti Pakistan's Shaheen II nuclear-capable missile. In terms of estimated warhead production, Pakistan can produce anywhere from 14-27 warheads annually, whereas India can only produce 2-5 warheads per year (Source: AP Photo)
This dynamic, in its totality, suggests that India's approach to nuclear deterrence is closer to that of the United States: both nations view their nuclear weapons primarily as deterrents against nuclear attacks by others, he observed.

"Pakistan's behaviour, however, exemplifies nuclear coercion rather than simply deterrence: to that degree, it mimics Russian behaviour more than it does the US practice of deterrence," Tellis said.

In a separate paper, Will Edwards, International Producer with The Cipher Brief, said Pakistan has long viewed nuclear weapons as a hedge against Indian aggression in disputed territories and a counterweight to India's conventional military superiority.


The difference is that now Pakistan has chosen to outstrip India's nuclear forces by drastically increasing fissile materials production and to employ smaller, tactical nuclear devices in a bid to counteract India's widening conventional supremacy, he wrote.

Currently, Pakistan out produces India in fissile material at a ratio of 4:1.

In terms of estimated warhead production, Pakistan can produce anywhere from 14-27 warheads annually, whereas India can only produce 2-5 warheads per year, he said.

http://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world...-effects-us-expert/ar-BBtvoRI?ocid=spartandhp

america's posession of nuclear weapons and other high tech weapons systems has had a VERY DESTABLISING effect on world peace and security. It has allowed it to go on a rampage, terrorizing, murdering, torturing and raping millions of innocent Iraqi and Afghan babies, men, women and children with impunity.

Many leading Pakistani and Muslim defence analysts are deeply concerned at this disturbing trend and development. They urge the americans and other zio baby killers to show restraint like Pakistan does.

 

[django]

Nuclear Pakistan has destabilising effects: US expert


Nuclear weapons in Pakistan's hands have "corrosively destabilising" effects in the region and provide a license for the country's sub-conventional wars against India, a top American expert has said.

"Unfortunately nuclear weapons in Pakistani hands have had larger and more corrosively destabilising effects: they have enabled Pakistan to pursue its revanchist aims of recovering the disputed state of Jammu and Kashmir by force, or more specifically, by unleashing state-supported terrorism against India in the hope of weakening Indian control over the contested territories," said Ashley Tellis from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

In an interview to The Cipher Brief, Tellis said this stratagem is based on the assumption that India will be unable to retaliate against Pakistan conventionally for fear of sparking a nuclear holocaust.

"Pakistan's nuclear weapons, then, are intended not merely to provide deterrence against Indian attacks, but more ambitiously, a license for Pakistan's sub-conventional wars against India," Tellis said in response to a question.

"This behaviour, flowing from Pakistan's possession of nuclear weapons, is what makes deterrence in South Asia more unstable than it would otherwise be— if Pakistan's strategic objectives were as conservative as India's," he said.

© pti Pakistan's Shaheen II nuclear-capable missile. In terms of estimated warhead production, Pakistan can produce anywhere from 14-27 warheads annually, whereas India can only produce 2-5 warheads per year (Source: AP Photo)
This dynamic, in its totality, suggests that India's approach to nuclear deterrence is closer to that of the United States: both nations view their nuclear weapons primarily as deterrents against nuclear attacks by others, he observed.

"Pakistan's behaviour, however, exemplifies nuclear coercion rather than simply deterrence: to that degree, it mimics Russian behaviour more than it does the US practice of deterrence," Tellis said.

In a separate paper, Will Edwards, International Producer with The Cipher Brief, said Pakistan has long viewed nuclear weapons as a hedge against Indian aggression in disputed territories and a counterweight to India's conventional military superiority.


The difference is that now Pakistan has chosen to outstrip India's nuclear forces by drastically increasing fissile materials production and to employ smaller, tactical nuclear devices in a bid to counteract India's widening conventional supremacy, he wrote.

Currently, Pakistan out produces India in fissile material at a ratio of 4:1.

In terms of estimated warhead production, Pakistan can produce anywhere from 14-27 warheads annually, whereas India can only produce 2-5 warheads per year, he said.

http://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world...-effects-us-expert/ar-BBtvoRI?ocid=spartandhp

Ashley Ellis born and raised in Mumbia.....give me a break ********

 

[Super Falcon]

What effect india creating is he blind

 

[HttpError]

******* indians as usual....

View attachment 307045

lol name ashley tellis and looks like Mr. Kumar

 

[SecularNationalist]

O teriii...!! I thought Ashley J. Tellis would be a woman..

or may be he is a bharti tranny

 

[jamal18]

You do know this comment can apply to any nation with nuclear weapons?

Yes. Especially the US.