What's new

'Nosy' nails IAF coffin at Pathankot

Itni subah uth ker aisay jalay huey comment matt likho...Dinn bura guzray gaa :lol:
I feel more confident when I show the exit to an indiot.

Indian usually dont have knowledge regarding to 65 war. Reasons

1) This war is related to death of Lal bahadur shastri and it is still not known how he died. There is nothing much written regarding to it.

2) So indian text book's have not written much like 1962 war( which was a failure of nehru). Congress eco system never mentioned its failures other than 1971.

3) I get confused, if your so called success's against india are so much, why they cud not bring any change on ground ?

Take Kargil,65 war( see how much pak territory india occupied wrt pak),Siachin etc..

65 war was fought by india with no planning and the reason was, india was recovering from 62 war but still they managed to throw back pakistani invasion of kashmir and enemy had to defend its own territory.

Now you are free to rejoice your little face saving success's.
Nice Bollywood Indian version, I am happy if this keeps you happy.
 
. . .
Indian usually dont have knowledge regarding to 65 war. Reasons

1) This war is related to death of Lal bahadur shastri and it is still not known how he died. There is nothing much written regarding to it.

2) So indian text book's have not written much like 1962 war( which was a failure of nehru). Congress eco system never mentioned its failures other than 1971.

3) I get confused, if your so called success's against india are so much, why they cud not bring any change on ground ?

Take Kargil,65 war( see how much pak territory india occupied wrt pak),Siachin etc..

65 war was fought by india with no planning and the reason was, india was recovering from 62 war but still they managed to throw back pakistani invasion of kashmir and enemy had to defend its own territory.

Now you are free to rejoice your little face saving success's.
It's funny how you guys come on PDF thinking you can lecture others.
Pakistan didn't exactly attack IOK with full strength unlike Indian attack on Lahore and Indian General issuing invitations to his commanders to join him for a victory toast in a Lahore club.
In case, you didn't notice, the thread is about an aspect of Aerial conflict rather than the overall war, and no doubt it was PAF's finest hour in mauling a much bigger force.
 
.
And yet you still name yourself endangered species. So the shupa powa India have no balls to do anything to the weak nation of Pakistan. What a retard you are.
Never heard about Munnu : A Kashmiri Boy, have you? And you folks yap that you are their 'Biradars'

the outcome was a small AF raped 5 times bigger AF in broad daylight
Actually it was more of masturbation by PAF. Or more like Nightfall / Etlaam. Thats okay, they did their side of job, in the air that is, After all they were airforce. Nothing happened on ground is another thing altogether.
 
.
It's funny how you guys come on PDF thinking you can lecture others.
Pakistan didn't exactly attack IOK with full strength unlike Indian attack on Lahore and Indian General issuing invitations to his commanders to join him for a victory toast in a Lahore club.
In case, you didn't notice, the thread is about an aspect of Aerial conflict rather than the overall war, and no doubt it was PAF's finest hour in mauling a much bigger force.

Bhai, Why wud india open western front if she had fire power to counter any pakistani attack in kashmir ? India was not left with any option but to open western border as it was difficult for them counter pakistani armor in kashmir.

Yes, i agree PAF performance was good wrt IAF in 65 war.
 
. .
It's funny how you guys come on PDF thinking you can lecture others.
Pakistan didn't exactly attack IOK with full strength unlike Indian attack on Lahore and Indian General issuing invitations to his commanders to join him for a victory toast in a Lahore club.
In case, you didn't notice, the thread is about an aspect of Aerial conflict rather than the overall war, and no doubt it was PAF's finest hour in mauling a much bigger force.
Compare PAF performance with those from other Muslim countries - some lost their entire fleet while still at the tarmac!!! If PAF can produce such pilots and performances once in every 50 years, they're still the best in my eyes and all their efforts are Helal.....
 
. . .
the outcome was a small AF raped 5 times bigger AF in broad daylight
The outcome of the war was Pakistan lost 3800 soldiers, India only 3000.
Pakista lost 200-300 tanks, India only 150-190.
Pakistan lost 1800 sq km territory, India only 600 sq km.

But more importantly, Pakistan started the war to capture Kashmir but could not gain a single inch.
 
.
Fears? :lol: Where that fear went in '71?
Mighty IAF
PAF_gallery.jpg


The outcome of the war was Pakistan lost 3800 soldiers, India only 3000.
Pakista lost 200-300 tanks, India only 150-190.
Pakistan lost 1800 sq km territory, India only 600 sq km.

But more importantly, Pakistan started the war to capture Kashmir but could not gain a single inch.
and Indian enjoyed their Champagne in Lahore:lol::lol::lol:
 
. . . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom