What's new

Norwegian gas just knocked Russia down a peg in Europe

Hindustani78

BANNED
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
40,471
Reaction score
-47
Country
India
Location
India
Norway just knocked Russia down a peg in Europe - Business Insider
41 minutes ago

Norway just officially overtook Russia as western Europe's top gas supplier — which suggests that the EU's attempt to move away from Moscow gas is working, according Reuters.

During the first quarter of 2015, Norway exported 29.2 billion cubic meters (bcm) to western Europe, according to figures from Norwegian state operator Gassco. Meanwhile, Russia sold 20.29 billion bcm, according to Gazprom figures.

The trend towards Norwegian gas began in the fourth quarter of 2014 when Europe bought 29.5 billion bcm and 19.8 billion bcm from Russia, according to numbers from the two state gas companies.

That being said, it's important to note that exports to EU members in eastern Europe are not included in this data.

The last time Norway (briefly) overtook Russia's gas was in 2012.

gazprom-28.jpg
via AFP

The European Union has been trying to reduce its dependence on Russian gas in favor of Norwegian (and other) gas suppliers for some time now.

This has been due to several factors, including Russia's tendency to use its arsenal of gas pipelines as tools of coercion, and, more recently, because of the conflict in Ukraine (the biggest transit route for Russian exports to the EU.)

Traditionally, Russia has provided one-third of the natural gas that European countries relied on both for heating their homes and running industries. And because Moscow played such a huge role in the gas market, it was able to command high prices.

"It is the power of colder weather that allows Russia, as the key supplier of energy to Europe, to apply leverage. That leverage can take the form of higher prices, restricted volumes, a combination of both, or negotiations that directly or indirectly affect these additional costs," Cumberland Advisors Chair David Kotok wrote in August.

putin-gazprom-1.jpg


Russia's President Vladimir Putin (R) meets with Gazprom's Chief Executive Alexei Miller at the Novo-Ogaryovo residence outside Moscow, October 29, 2012.
Meanwhile, Norway's supply boost has been attributed in part to the end of the outage at Troll, which produces around 30% of the country's gas. The company returned to full capacity in March of 2014.

For 2014 as a whole, the European Commission said that Russia was still the main EU supplier, although its total share of imports fell to 42% from 43%, and in volume terms fell by more than 10%.

During the same period, Norway's imports jumped from 34% to 38% in 2014.
 
. . . .
.
There are many other alternatives to Russia,let's continue in this way !
Care to shed some light of such alternatives?Maybe more expensive gas from Norway and Qatar(country openly supporting terrorism)?Or maybe non-existent USA LNG?Maybe good old coal?Or extremely expensive"green"energy?Which one of them?Do you know what happen with the price of products produced with expensive energy?And what does it mean for their competitiveness on the market?
I also think the Americans were beginning shipments in the coming years. And within Europe, Lithuania has a pipeline project:
I suggest to educate yourself about so-called "shale revolution" and non-existent facilities necessary to ship LNG to Europe.Much smarter than you people have made calculation about the costs and what will mean for prices in EU.I also suggest to educate yourself about whole affair with LNG terminals in Baltics.Lithuanian LNG project is politically based and with zero economical value.Norway gas is more expensive,yearly taxes for the terminal is too big for such small country,gas price inside country has been increased and will be further increased.Recently court has ordered state companies to increase purchase from the terminal from previous 30 to 65% in futile attempt to boost use of it and gain some profit at the expense of population of course.Also other two of Baltic "tigers" have their own plans for LNG terminals and have no intention to abandon them.Since you obviously have problems with economical realities-LNG is too expensive for such countries,projects have no economical values,prices of everything related to gas need to increased in order to cover them.Again much smarter than you people have made the calculations before even the first terminal has been build predicting what will happen-current situation.
Turkmenistan has thrown its hand into the mix too:
Do you even know how much and for how long are Turkmenistan contracts signed with China for delivery?Do you even know in order a pipeline to be build via Caspian Sea all countries around it need to agreed and give their OK for construction?Since you missed it - central part of the sea is a zone jointly used and developed,all projects in it need to be agreed by all countries.There will be no OK neither from Russia nor from Iran for Turkmenistan pipeline via Caspian Sea..ever.
Many, many alternatives to Russian gas.
Yes like building nuclear power plants and EU has no money to build so many to replace Russian gas.Also there is that "little" problem with nuclear waste.Guess which is only one country in the world having working technology to produce nuclear power sells from nuclear waste with added bonus for less than 5 years remaining waste becoming environment friendly-it is Russia.In short for you and ppl like you-there is no alternatives to Russian gas deliveries in next few decades.
 
.
Care to shed some light of such alternatives?Maybe more expensive gas from Norway and Qatar(country openly supporting terrorism)?Or maybe non-existent USA LNG?Maybe good old coal?Or extremely expensive"green"energy?Which one of them?Do you know what happen with the price of products produced with expensive energy?And what does it mean for their competitiveness on the market?

I suggest to educate yourself about so-called "shale revolution" and non-existent facilities necessary to ship LNG to Europe.Much smarter than you people have made calculation about the costs and what will mean for prices in EU.I also suggest to educate yourself about whole affair with LNG terminals in Baltics.Lithuanian LNG project is politically based and with zero economical value.Norway gas is more expensive,yearly taxes for the terminal is too big for such small country,gas price inside country has been increased and will be further increased.Recently court has ordered state companies to increase purchase from the terminal from previous 30 to 65% in futile attempt to boost use of it and gain some profit at the expense of population of course.Also other two of Baltic "tigers" have their own plans for LNG terminals and have no intention to abandon them.Since you obviously have problems with economical realities-LNG is too expensive for such countries,projects have no economical values,prices of everything related to gas need to increased in order to cover them.Again much smarter than you people have made the calculations before even the first terminal has been build predicting what will happen-current situation.

Do you even know how much and for how long are Turkmenistan contracts signed with China for delivery?Do you even know in order a pipeline to be build via Caspian Sea all countries around it need to agreed and give their OK for construction?Since you missed it - central part of the sea is a zone jointly used and developed,all projects in it need to be agreed by all countries.There will be no OK neither from Russia nor from Iran for Turkmenistan pipeline via Caspian Sea..ever.

Yes like building nuclear power plants and EU has no money to build so many to replace Russian gas.Also there is that "little" problem with nuclear waste.Guess which is only one country in the world having working technology to produce nuclear power sells from nuclear waste with added bonus for less than 5 years remaining waste becoming environment friendly-it is Russia.In short for you and ppl like you-there is no alternatives to Russian gas deliveries in next few decades.

So I take it you're not happy then:lol:.

DNAPle6.png
 
. . .
Jealousy.

It certainly seems so. The numbers, as per the article, highlight the Europe is looking away from Russian gas and towards domestic (within Europe) or Central Asian sources. Russia's ability to alter gas flows and prices via its state-run or state-link energy firms frightened the rest of Europe. Russia has no one but themselves to blame.

NORWAY GAS-Exports to Europe steady - Yahoo Finance UK

Even Ukraine is in talks with Europe about selling gas:

Kiev Claims Ukraine Capable of Delivering Gas from Norway to Romania

And we've got plenty of resources:

TABLE-Norway's preliminary oil output rose in April| Energy & Oil| Reuters

Always happy to educate those(who for some strange reasons) are unable to do a simply web search on the topic they comment.

:agree:
 
Last edited:
.
It certainly seems so. The number, as per the article highlight the Europe is looking away from Russian gas and towards domestic (within Europe) or Central Asian sources. Russia's ability to alter gas flows and prices via its state-run or state-link energy firms frightened the rest of Europe. Russia has no one but themselves to blame.

NORWAY GAS-Exports to Europe steady - Yahoo Finance UK

Even Ukraine is in talks with Europe about selling gas:

Kiev Claims Ukraine Capable of Delivering Gas from Norway to Romania

And we've got plenty of resources:

TABLE-Norway's preliminary oil output rose in April| Energy & Oil| Reuters



I hope so:lol:.



:lol:

As you can see,from 2011 to 2012,our gas imports from Norway increased to 38,4% (From 37%),and Russia decreased from 14,7 to 14,4 , slowly but surely ! Norway is our first supplier,and will remain so ! BORK BORK ! :bunny:
And it wil again decrease because Russia isn't seen as a 'good partner'.

cgBiRLC.png

EHOp53w.png
 
.
:victory::yahoo:

Turkmenistan has thrown its hand into the mix too:

Exclusive: European Union sees supplies of natural gas from Turkmenistan by 2019

Europe and Turkmenistan Make Nice

I also think the Americans were beginning shipments in the coming years. And within Europe, Lithuania has a pipeline project:

EU funding for Lithuanian LNG pipeline

Many, many alternatives to Russian gas.

View attachment 223996
As you can see,from 2011 to 2012,our gas imports from Norway increased to 38,4% (From 37%),and Russia decreased from 14,7 to 14,4 , slowly but surely ! Norway is our first supplier,and will remain so ! BORK BORK ! :bunny:
And it wil again decrease because Russia isn't seen as a 'good partner'.

cgBiRLC.png

EHOp53w.png

Come on people have a heart ! :(

axNY2wY_700b[1].jpg
 
.
As you can see,from 2011 to 2012,our gas imports from Norway increased to 38,4% (From 37%),and Russia decreased from 14,7 to 14,4 , slowly but surely ! Norway is our first supplier,and will remain so ! BORK BORK ! :bunny:
And it wil again decrease because Russia isn't seen as a 'good partner'.

cgBiRLC.png

EHOp53w.png

Bork Yeah!!! The numbers, contrary to our Bulgarian friend, indicate Europe is diversifying its energy needs.

Come on people have a heart ! :(

View attachment 224004

I had a heart once, it tasted terrible.

:devil:

If Russia wants to be treated with respect it could make the first move and treat us with respect . Otherwise:taz:.

Norway didn't poke Russia, why's Russia poking us?
 
Last edited:
. . .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom