What's new

North Korean Rocket Said to Fail Moments After Liftoff

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
You are very good at changing the topic when you know you have lost an argument. You stared with an argument on micro satellites, which fell flat. You made fun of ISRO, and I showed you how Canada space is no. 8 and ISRO is number 4. You couldnt digest it. Then you like a 8 year old girl deflected the topic to GDP between India and Canada. And now IQ. Dude are you even 5 year old ???? Please dont discuss a topic YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT. STICK TO MAKING NOODLES !

Fell flat on microsatelites? Where? They are cheap and easy to build, which is why India makes them.

No.8 on Rankopedia? I'm sorry, I don't have the time to make an account there to vote against 1.2+ billion poor, and dumb bonded laboring Indians. People would actually care about the ranking if it didn't end with "pedia."

On the other hand, the launch success rate figures I posted were officially researched and it shows that 1/2 of Indian launches fail, showing how Indian scientists have epically low IQ.

Oh, by the way, the Chinese Communist Party did not invent IQ. Multiple influential Western publications such as the IQ and the Wealth of Nations is a 2002 book by Dr. Richard Lynn have proved that Indians are genetically inferior than most of the world and is near African level of intelligence.

You sir, were not only born poor but also mentally deficient. No matter how hard you try in life (Indians are lazy, so it wouldn't matter), people of higher IQ will always be wealthier and smarter than you.

Hyping your own capacity, is pathetic. Know your own place in the world's racial hierarchy.
 
.
.
This is a silly discussion. According to wikipedia and an article on bbc news, the combined weight of all 10 satellites is 827 kg (690 + 87 + 50).

whereas China launches 5ton kg commercial satellites (nigcomsat-1) for other countries.

Cartosat-2A - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
BBC NEWS | South Asia | India's growing strides in space

This combined with the much higher success rate & other accomplishes like putting a man in space, we can only conclude the Chinese spaceprogram is better.
.

how about putting 10 diffferent satellites into space in one go? its 10 times more simpler to put one satellite then 10 in one go?

how about the unparelleled success of Chnadrayaan in any chinese mission?

how about any rocket in Chinese as successful as PSLV?

how about launching the most number of foreign payloads? (b/w India n china)

How about the safety record.. the comparision b/w number of people killed by Chinese = thousands, India=0 ?

as i can see the only area they are ahread is lifting more weight.. India has also lifted 2.5 tonnes only thing is it doesnt mix weapons with civilian program.

overall India is much better and ahead. or counter above points.
 
.
how about putting 10 diffferent satellites into space in one go? its 10 times more simpler to put one satellite then 10 in one go?

not hard at all. china has sent more than 2 satellites form time to time around 1000kg~1500 kg each since 70's. china is not interested or have room for student's 1~2kg satellite toys that don't lasted very long in orbit, also no money making in that.lolz. it's definitely harder if it's multiple warheads, but not.aha

how about the unparelleled success of Chnadrayaan in any chinese mission?

chnadrayaan was on fire since it got to earth's orbit and useless before completing its 2 yrs mission. i don't know if you can called that success.

how about any rocket in Chinese as successful as PSLV?

lol

total launch record since 1970

failure/success - 8/159

1 failure / 117 success launches since 1996..with real payloads of course

*ttp://www.calt.com/english/record/index.html

india's biggest payload launcher, GSLV

2/7 lol

how about launching the most number of foreign payloads? (b/w India n china)

china foreign launches are mostly around 3.5t~5.5t comsat. no 1kg student's experimental toys that usually don't last more thnt a month in space.lol

How about the safety record.. the comparision b/w number of people killed by Chinese = thousands, India=0 ?

lol

total launch record since 1970

failure/success - 8/159

1 failure / 117 success launches since 1996..with real payloads of course

*ttp://www.calt.com/english/record/index.html

as i can see the only area they are ahread is lifting more weight.. India has also lifted 2.5 tonnes only thing is it doesnt mix weapons with civilian program.

lol

overall India is much better and ahead. or counter above points.

:cheesy: :lol:



=====================================================

Long March International Commercial Launch Record

Payload/SC Launch Vehicle Customer Launch Date Ref.
Micro-gravity Test Instrument LM-2C F09 MartraMaconi, France 5 Aug. 1987
Micro-gravity Test Instrument LM-2C F11 Intospace , Germany 5 Aug. 1988
AsiaSat-1 LM-3 F07 AsiaSat, HK 7 April 1990 Dedicated
BADR-A/ Aussat Dummy Payload LM-2E F01 , Pakistan 16 July 1990
Aussat-B1 LM-2E F02 Aussat, Australia 14 Aug. 1992 Dedicated
Freja LM-2C F13 SSC, Sweden 6 Oct. 1992 Piggyback
Optus-B2 LM-2E F03 Aussat, Australia 21 Dec. 1992 Dedicated
APSTAR-I LM-3 F09 APT, HK 21 July 1994 Dedicated
Optus-B3 LM-2E F04 Optus, Australia 28 Aug. 1994 Dedicated
APSTAR-II LM-2E F05 APT, HK 26 Jan. 1995 Dedicated
AsiaSat-2 LM-2E F06 (EPKM) AsiaSat ,HK 28 Nov. 1995 Dedicated
EchoStar-1 LM-2E F07 (EPKM) EchoStar, USA 28 Dec. 1995 Dedicated
INTELSAT-7A LM-3B F01 INTELSAT 15 Feb. 1996 Dedicated
APSTAR-IA LM-3 F10 APT, HK 3 July 1996 Dedicated
Micro-gravity Test Instrument LM-2D F03 Marubeni Corp., Japan 20 Oct. 1996
MabuhaySat LM-3B F02 Mabuhay, The Philippines 20 Aug. 1997
APSTAR-IIR LM-3B F03 APT, HK 17 Oct. 1997 Dedicated
Iridium LM-2C/SD F02 Motorola, USA 8 Dec. 1997 Dual
Iridium LM-2C/SD F03 Motorola, USA 26 Mar. 1998 Dual
Iridium LM-2C/SD F04 Motorola, USA 2 May 1998 Dual
Iridium LM-2C/SD F05 Motorola, USA 20 Aug. 1998 Dual
Iridium LM-2C/SD F06 Motorola, USA 19 Dec. 1999 Dual
Iridium LM-2C/SD F07 Motorola, USA 12 Jun. 1999 Dual
CBERS-01 LM-4 F04 INPE, Brazil 14 Oct. 1999 Dedicated
SACI LM-4 F04 INPE, Brazil 14 Oct. 1999 Piggyback
CBERS-02 LM-4 F08 INPE, Brazil 21 Oct. 2003 Dedicated
APSTAR-VI LM-3B F06 APT, HK 12 April 2005 Dedicated
NigComSat-1 LM-3B F07 NSRDA, Nigeria 14 May 2007 Dedicated
CBERS-02B LM-3B F09 INPE, Brazil 19 Sept. 2007 Dedicated
VeneSat-1 LM-3B F11 Venezuelan Ministry of Science and Technology 30 Oct.
PALAPA-D LM-3B F12 PT IndonisiaTbk 31 Aug 2009 Dedicated
Paksat-1R LM-3B F15 SUPARCO 12 Aug. 2011 Dedicated
W3C LM-3B F17 Eutelsat 07 Oct. 2011 Dedicated
NigComSat-1R LM-3B F18 NSRDA, Nigeria 20 Dec 2011 Dedicated
--
to be launched in 2012

luxembourg - vesselsat-2
TurkmenistanSat
venezuela VRSS-1
turkey - gokturk-2
Pakistani remote sensing satellite (RSSS)
 
.
Fell flat on microsatelites? Where? They are cheap and easy to build, which is why India makes them.

No.8 on Rankopedia? I'm sorry, I don't have the time to make an account there to vote against 1.2+ billion poor, and dumb bonded laboring Indians. People would actually care about the ranking if it didn't end with "pedia."

On the other hand, the launch success rate figures I posted were officially researched and it shows that 1/2 of Indian launches fail, showing how Indian scientists have epically low IQ.

Oh, by the way, the Chinese Communist Party did not invent IQ. Multiple influential Western publications such as the IQ and the Wealth of Nations is a 2002 book by Dr. Richard Lynn have proved that Indians are genetically inferior than most of the world and is near African level of intelligence.

You sir, were not only born poor but also mentally deficient. No matter how hard you try in life (Indians are lazy, so it wouldn't matter), people of higher IQ will always be wealthier and smarter than you.

Hyping your own capacity, is pathetic Know your own place in the world's racial hierarchy.


Personal racial attack now. Poverty, IQ,.... anything else. ????

"Futron's recently released analysis of the 10 leading space nations reveals Canada lost its sixth-place ranking to India in 2010."

2011 Space Competitiveness Index: India Overtakes Canada


"In fact there is growing competition in the small launcher market. So there is little need for another small satellite launcher to compete internationally as there are cheap options available from other countries including the American Falcon 1E from SpaceX and the Minotaur from Orbital Sciences Corporation, the Indian PSLV and the European Space Agency Vega and several sub-orbital options."

http://spaceref.ca/national-securit...a-lack-of-satellite-launching-capability.html
Now this should make you cry even more. This time like a 2 year old. May I remind you , your Chowmein is on fire and your customers are cursing. Please attend to your kitchen. Satellites are not your cup of tea. making tea is !!!!:P
 
.
better to work in an air conditioned sweatshop with guaranteed housing and food served by waiters in a cafeteria, than the conditions that some Indians work with under the commonwealth games.

an Indian talking about working conditions is hilarious.
A so-called "factory" in india is just a bunch of malnutritioned people (male or female) sitting on a dirt floor doing something :rofl:

Not surprising from a people known for providing slave labor to the Middle East and the British Empire for 1000 years added together.
 
.
how about putting 10 diffferent satellites into space in one go? its

not hard at all. china has sent more than 2 satellites form time around 1000kg~1500 kg each since 70's. china is not interested or have room for for student's 1~2kg satellite toys that don't lasted very long in orbit, also no money making in that.lolz. it's definitely harder if it's multiple warheads, but not.aha



chnadrayaan was on fire since it got to earth's orbit and useless before completing its 2 yrs mission. i don't know if you can called that success.



lol

total launch record since 1970

failure/success - 8/159

1 failure / 117 success launches since 1996..with real payloads of course

*ttp://www.calt.com/english/record/index.html



china foreign launches are mostly around 3.5t~5.5t comsat. no 1kg student experimental toys that usually don't last more thnt a month in space.lol



lol

total launch record since 1970

failure/success - 8/159

1 failure / 117 success launches since 1996..with real payloads of course

*ttp://www.calt.com/english/record/index.html



lol



:cheesy: :lol:



=====================================================

so only India Launched 10 in one go.. not u coz u CANT... that is why ur father in Space Russia also failed while attempting around 9,10 in one go.. that shows its complex... u dare not try it..

so ur programme has had nothing comparable to Chandrayann success..

u killed thousands of civilians in ur programme and India killed 0 civilians.

China whose rocket flew directly into people's home? can u believe such country not having more countless failures. :lol: only thing is what comes out is what ccp decided.. ccp can decide its success rate from 20% to 99.99% depending upon the stats it agrees to release :lol:

only thing China is ahead is in more lifting weight... India can also lift all that hevy hevy satellites if it mixed its space n civilian program which we didnt...So lifting more heavy is not significant..

so overall China is much behind.... in terms of MISSION ACCOMPLISHMENTS (CHANDRAYAAN), COMPLEXITY OF MISSION (10 LAUNCHES IN ONE GO - WORLD RECORD, u can only launch one at a time.. :lol:) , and SAFETY OF ITS PEOPLE IN LAUNCHES (India civilain casualty = 0, Chinese = thousands)

so what exactly r u bragging about. :lol: China- we can lift more(which we too if we mixed space and civilian).. aprt from that what else... nothing :lol:
 
.
A so-called "factory" in india is just a bunch of malnutritioned people (male or female) sitting on a dirt floor doing something :rofl:

Not surprising from a people known for providing slave labor to the Middle East and the British Empire for 1000 years added together.[/QUOTE]

We dont take anything from you seriously ! You are mentally challenged ! early childhood melamine toxicity I guess
 
.
.
A so-called "factory" in india is just a bunch of malnutritioned people (male or female) sitting on a dirt floor doing something :rofl:

Not surprising from a people known for providing slave labor to the Middle East and the British Empire for 1000 years added together.

you know if you can read and write your own name you're qualify as literate in india..indians loving these feel good sh1t! lol

The unemployable literates of India
Published: Sunday, Apr 17, 2011, 2:41 IST
By RN Bhaskar | Place: Mumbai | Agency: DNA

Prima facie, there is much cause for cheer. Provisional data gleaned from the latest Census show that India’s literacy levels have soared: India’s effective literacy rate jumped by 9.2% to reach 74.04 %.

Significantly, literacy rates improved sharply among females compared to males. Thus, while effective literacy rates for males rose from 75.26% to 82.14% — a rise of 6.9% — literacy rates for females climbed from 53.67% to 65.48%, an 11.8% increase.

That is heartening news indeed. But this data masks a few worrying concerns. First, the data relates to effective literacy, and not literacy. Measuring effective literacy in India means including anyone who can read and write his or her own name.Thus, if Ram knows how to read and write the three letters of his name, and Sita knows how to read and write the four letters of her name, they get included in the category of effective literates. This is not the way developed countries define literacy.

*ttp://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/main-article_the-unemployable-literates-of-india_1532691
 
. .
Personal racial attack now. Poverty, IQ,.... anything else. ????

"Futron's recently released analysis of the 10 leading space nations reveals Canada lost its sixth-place ranking to India in 2010."

2011 Space Competitiveness Index: India Overtakes Canada


"In fact there is growing competition in the small launcher market. So there is little need for another small satellite launcher to compete internationally as there are cheap options available from other countries including the American Falcon 1E from SpaceX and the Minotaur from Orbital Sciences Corporation, the Indian PSLV and the European Space Agency Vega and several sub-orbital options."

Is Canadian Sovereignty at Risk by a Lack of an Indigenous Satellite Launch Capability? - SpaceRef Canada
Now this should make you cry even more. This time like a 2 year old. May I remind you , your Chowmein is on fire and your customers are cursing. Please attend to your kitchen. Satellites are not your cup of tea. making tea is !!!!:P

LOL, your own figure just disproved the fact that the Indian space competitiveness is after China (4th) and Japan (5th), at 6th place.

There is a difference between official research and online democratic elections at rankopedia, isn't there?

Futron Study: U.S. Losing Ground In Space | AVIATION WEEK

An Indian just admitted the Indian space industry is inferior to the Chinese and Japanese. What more can I say? Thanks for being a poor, low IQ, bonded Indian slave, by refuting your own argument.
 
.
so only India Launched 10 in one go.. not u coz u CANT... that is why ur father in Space Russia also failed while attempting around 9,10 in one go.. that shows its complex... u dare not try it..

so ur programme has had nothing comparable to Chandrayann success..

u killed thousands of civilians in ur programme and India killed 0 civilians.

China whose rocket flew directly into people's home? can u believe such country not having more countless failures. :lol: only thing is what comes out is what ccp decided.. ccp can decide its success rate from 20% to 99.99% depending upon the stats it agrees to release :lol:

only thing China is ahead is in more lifting weight... India can also lift all that hevy hevy satellites if it mixed its space n civilian program which we didnt...So lifting more heavy is not significant..

so overall China is much behind.... in terms of MISSION ACCOMPLISHMENTS (CHANDRAYAAN), COMPLEXITY OF MISSION (10 LAUNCHES IN ONE GO - WORLD RECORD, u can only launch one at a time.. :lol:) , and SAFETY OF ITS PEOPLE IN LAUNCHES (India civilain casualty = 0, Chinese = thousands)

so what exactly r u bragging about. :lol: China- we can lift more(which we too if we mixed space and civilian).. aprt from that what else... nothing :lol:

Let's forget about China or Canada here. Since neither USA or Russia had launched 10 mini satellites in one go, maybe you should conclude that India's civilian rocket launching technology is more advanced than those two also.

Along the way, many fellow travelers have joined them — enthusiasm for building satellites as small as a single kilo has exploded among academic institutions, in scientific missions, and even in military circles. A small satellite can now be built for a few million dollars each — compare that to the standard quarter-billion dollar telecom sat. The idea of building low-cost satellite systems assembled on rapid schedules appears to be an economically attractive one.

On the other hand, commercial space systems have been less likely to trend towards smaller and, in fact, have been going directly in the other path. Commercial telecom satellites have been growing ever larger, due to increased demands for ever larger and more powerful antennas, more transponders and spot beams, and more power from larger arrays of solar panels.
INSIGHT: Satellites—Bigger Or Smaller? Yes! : SatMagazine
Since the trend of commercial satellites is getting bigger and bigger, real space agency like the ones of USA, Russia, China, EU and Japan are focusing on heavy lifting launching systems instead of some high school science projects.

And I don't know how do you define the success of Chandrayaan when it did not even go through half of its mission life.
Chandrayan I Mission Failure Setback For India

The Chandrayan I vehicle was launched in October 2008 and successfully inserted into lunar orbit on Nov. 8, 2008. On Nov. 14,2008, the Moon Impact Probe separated from the Moon-orbiting Chandrayaan at 20:06 Indian Standard Time and impacted the lunar south pole in a controlled manner, making India the fourth country to place its flag on the Moon.
by Staff Writers
New Delhi, India (XNA) Sep 02, 2009
Less than a year after its launch, India's first unmanned lunar mission, Chandrayan I, knocked off the country's endeavor to assert its power in space, after it lost radio contact with the mission control following a technical glitch believed to have been caused by a burst of sun spot activity.
Though the state-run Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) hailed the moon mission a "great success" despite abandoning it midway, experts have claimed that the mission, which put India in an elite club of countries - the United States, Russia, Japan, China and members of the European Space Agency - and was expected to last two years, has shattered India's dream of taking the first key stride towards landing an unmanned moon rover by 2012.

"The 100 million U.S. dollar moon mission survived for only 315days. It was scheduled for two years. Now, the satellite is to crash onto the lunar surface. It's a great loss to India's space explorations. The abandoning of the mission has dashed the country's most ambitious effort in space explorations. It was a major boost to the country's space program, particularly with India competing with Asian nations like China and Japan in this field," said space analyst R.K. Roy.

The Chandrayan I vehicle was launched in October 2008 and successfully inserted into lunar orbit on Nov. 8, 2008. On Nov. 14,2008, the Moon Impact Probe separated from the Moon-orbiting Chandrayaan at 20:06 Indian Standard Time and impacted the lunar south pole in a controlled manner, making India the fourth country to place its flag on the Moon.

India Sunday formally called off the Chandrayaan-1 moon mission, with the ISRO losing its radio contact with the craft.

"There was no possibility of retrieving it. (But) it was a great success. We could collect a large volume of data, including more than 70,000 images of the moon. In that sense, 95 percent of the objective was completed," ISRO chief Madhavan Nair told media in Panaji, the capital of western state of Goa.

"Most of the missions are expensive between one and 2 billion U.S. dollars. India can be proud as Chandrayaan-1 was less than 100 million U.S. dollar mission. We started the Indian mission inviting queries, the response was very good. We spent 85 million U.S dollars, while 30 million U.S. dollars were spent by the other partners. No country has done mission of this kind for less than 500 million U.S. dollars," Nair had said.

However, not everybody agrees with that.

"Whatever the ISRO says, the mission is a great loss for India, both monetarily and scientifically. Many did not welcome the efforts in the beginning when it was launched, saying it's a waste of resources in a country where millions still lack basic services. But we the scientific fraternity took it in a positive stride. But, it now shows that India still lacks in expertise. They should have anticipated these glitches which the mission can face," said Mumbai-based scientist Deb Sharma.

"It's unbelievable, the mission that was expected to last for two years, could not complete even a year. What is this? Hardly people know that one focus was to prospect the lunar surface for natural resources, including uranium for nuclear fuel. And, ISRO is saying that it's a great success, all this to save face," he added.

But justifying ISRO's efforts and pinning hope on the collected data, Professor Narendra Bhandari, a member of science advisory board of Chandrayaan-1, told media, "it is difficult to ascertain reasons for loss of contact. We've excelled in departments like propulsion system, reaching the moon in a precise manner. However, the thermal profiling and the sun sensors on the satellite did not give the expected result. The most important thing for us now is to ascertain answers from the collected data."

Local media too commented on the Chandrayan's failure. "India's lunar honeymoon is over," the country's leading English daily The Times of India said.

Political analyst Prof. Ajay Singh commented on the issue like this: "For a lay man, the mission is equally important as that to a scientist. It's a something that gave India a cut above others. But, scientists are trying to justify that a two-year mission could complete 95 percent of its work in less than a year. This is just an excuse."

The fact is that India's first rendezvous with the moon was cut short halfway due to some unexplained mishap. Clearly, lessons are to be learned before the launch of Chandrayan-2, he added.
Chandrayan I Mission Failure Setback For India
 
.
LOL, your own figure just disproved the fact that the Indian space competitiveness is after China (4th) and Japan (5th), at 6th place.

There is a difference between official research and online democratic elections at rankopedia, isn't there?

Futron Study: U.S. Losing Ground In Space | AVIATION WEEK

An Indian just admitted the Indian space industry is inferior to the Chinese and Japanese. What more can I say? Thanks for being a poor, low IQ, bonded Indian slave, by refuting your own argument.


Here is some more

India to Launch Canadian Satellite in in July


http://spaceref.ca/isro/canadian-satellites-launch-on-indias-pslv-c20-delayed-again.html

We just said we are superior you canadians and we proved it. Now can we have the Chowmein please ????
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom