What's new

North Korea nuclear test imminent

Obviously NK nuke tests would prompt Sk to go nuclear sooner or later.
 
.
LOL at the autistic Korean with an inferiority complex. Look at a map. Beijing is 1000 kilometers away from the DMZ. Seoul is within artillery distance from North Koreans with chemical / biological weapons. Very soon add nuclear to that.

South Koreans will meet their end very soon :devil:

A nuclear strike inside NK close to Chinese Border will do the trick if NK uses nukes against South Korea.

Obviously NK nuke tests would prompt Sk to go nuclear sooner or later.

They are under the protection of US nuclear umbrella. If NK uses nuke, Mr. Aun will be left with a radioactive wasteland to rule over.
 
. .
North Korea is wakened by what happened in Libya, and Iran. I point out that the capital of South Korea is too close to be defended. The citizens are innocent.
 
.
And China has to explain to the UNSC why it violated the UN sanction.


And the ROK response is a ballistic missile capable of striking Beijing.

By violating the NPT and Missile Technology Control Regime, you have set yourselves up to a rogue state. As a leading nation and permanent member of the UNSC, China will enforce all UN treaties in the East Asian area, and thus strikes against dual use and military targets such as power plants, water treatment plants, dams, schools, hospitals, bridges and transmission lines with ballistic and cruise missiles would be a valid response to an existential threat to all nations in East Asia.
 
.
By violating the NPT and Missile Technology Control Regime, you have set yourselves up to a rogue state. As a leading nation and permanent member of the UNSC, China will enforce all UN treaties in the East Asian area, and thus strikes against dual use and military targets such as power plants, water treatment plants, dams, schools, hospitals, bridges and transmission lines with ballistic and cruise missiles would be a valid response to an existential threat to all nations in East Asia.
As a permanent member of the US Security Council, China proved to be the least active member of said body when it comes to global issues.
 
. .
As a permanent member of the US Security Council, China proved to be the least active member of said body when it comes to global issues.

And when we do give input like on Syria (that was our 8th veto ever), the US only whines even harder. Is the only 'contribution' one can make to veto the hundreds of resolutions about Israel?
 
.
As a permanent member of the US Security Council, China proved to be the least active member of said body when it comes to global issues.

Oh, we are very active when it comes to enforcing arms control treaties in East and Southeast Asia. That is because China is a responsible state. Any rogue state that goes against the NPT and MTCR that does not respond constructively to diplomatic and economic incentives may need to be dealt with through limited strikes on military and dual use targets.
 
.
Oh, we are very active when it comes to enforcing arms control treaties in East and Southeast Asia. That is because China is a responsible state. Any rogue state that goes against the NPT and MTCR that does not respond constructively to diplomatic and economic incentives may need to be dealt with through limited strikes on military and dual use targets.
How? Show everyone something.
 
. .
And when we do give input like on Syria (that was our 8th veto ever), the US only whines even harder. Is the only 'contribution' one can make to veto the hundreds of resolutions about Israel?
The US does more than just vote or give verbal inputs. So it looks like the biggest whiner on the UNSC is China who 'input' but nothing else.
 
.
By violating the NPT and Missile Technology Control Regime, you have set yourselves up to a rogue state.
?? What are you talking about?

As a leading nation and permanent member of the UNSC, China will enforce all UN treaties in the East Asian area
Yes, please do enforce the UN embargo and stop supplying weapons to North Korea.

thus strikes against dual use and military targets such as power plants, water treatment plants, dams, schools, hospitals, bridges and transmission lines with ballistic and cruise missiles would be a valid response to an existential threat to all nations in East Asia.
Except that China pledged to no-first use under any circumstance, even against another nuclear power. So if Beijing gets hit by a ballistic missile, the only retaliation available is a conventional ballistic missile strike.

Generally, the scenario that would result in a ballistic missile strike in Beijing would be a Chinese missile launch against ROK/US military installations.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom