What's new

North Korea Defence Forum

higher the arc of the missile the harder it is to hit it with an anti-ballistic missile. apogee is 2,000KM range is what 500 to 600KM?? looks like the target would be Seoul. THAAD and SM-3 would have a hard time hitting this.
It is a good observation, still with a normal BM apogee it will have a range of ~ 5000 km..So it is good for both scenarios..
 
.
It is a good observation, still with a normal BM apogee, it will have a range of ~ 5000 km..So it is good for both scenarios..


if it goes for the 5,000KM range then SM-3 would easily shoot these warheads down.

THAAD-ER would also work well as well. I can see THAAD-ER protecting Guam.

 
.
if it goes for the 5,000KM range then SM-3 would easily shoot these warheads down.

THAAD-ER would also work well as well. I can see THAAD-ER protecting Guam.

If it comes to a mather of life and death, the NKoreans will try to deal with THAAD and SM-3 platforms first and wait for any time gap to launch their BMs.. hope it is just a deterrent..
 
. . .
Waoo here comes Russia, Clearly S-300 or S400 based missile system.
S-300

S-400

 
.
interesting. Still Radars sensors and all other equipment is very vital for a SAM in addition to Missiles
 
. . .
The bombing was long, leisurely and merciless, even by the assessment of America’s own leaders. “Over a period of three years or so, we killed off — what — 20 percent of the population,” Air Force Gen. Curtis LeMay, head of the Strategic Air Command during the Korean War, told the Office of Air Force History in 1984. Dean Rusk, a supporter of the war and later secretary of state, said the United States bombed “everything that moved in North Korea, every brick standing on top of another.” After running low on urban targets, U.S. bombers destroyed hydroelectric and irrigation dams in the later stages of the war, flooding farmland and destroying crops.
 
. . . . . .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom