‘No talks if Pakistan insists Kashmir is a territorial dispute’

[Omar1984]

by sidelining the question you are saying its not disputed for pakistan(or limited in the dispute).

I'm saying Kashmir, in its entirity, is disputed which is recognized as disputed territory by the entire world and the people who have been living in the disputed territory for generations should decide who the disputed territory belongs to.

 

[araz]

Do pakistanis agree that pakistan occupied kashmir is disputed?

Zombie.
the last time i checked there was no movement for independance going on in Pakistani kashmir. Whichever coloured glasses you look through , there is one ongoing in indian Occupied jkashmir. Do you ever wonder why? If you guys do not know, read up on the kashmir dispute from an independnat source rather than some tainted propaganda ridden Indian publication.
Do you know that had there been no dispute over kashmir, we would all have been better off and concentrating on developing our social sectors, rather than burning hard earned cash into arms that may never be used in defence of our nations.
Regards
Araz

 

[zombie]

Zombie.
the last time i checked there was no movement for independance going on in Pakistani kashmir. Whichever coloured glasses you look through , there is one ongoing in indian Occupied jkashmir. Do you ever wonder why? If you guys do not know, read up on the kashmir dispute from an independnat source rather than some tainted propaganda ridden Indian publication.
Do you know that had there been no dispute over kashmir, we would all have been better off and concentrating on developing our social sectors, rather than burning hard earned cash into arms that may never be used in defence of our nations.
Regards
Araz

whether you check or not the question is of dispute. You want the other person to agree to the dispute when you are not ready to agree that your area itself could be the dispute or want to limit the dispute. unless you agree that the pakistani part of kashmir is also potentially indian territory there is no dispute.

 

[Proud2Indian]

Zombie.
the last time i checked there was no movement for independance going on in Pakistani kashmir. Whichever coloured glasses you look through , there is one ongoing in indian Occupied jkashmir. Do you ever wonder why? If you guys do not know, read up on the kashmir dispute from an independnat source rather than some tainted propaganda ridden Indian publication.
Do you know that had there been no dispute over kashmir, we would all have been better off and concentrating on developing our social sectors, rather than burning hard earned cash into arms that may never be used in defence of our nations.
Regards
Araz

Kashmir is one issue abt which whole pakistan is aware of but I don't think even half of India knows abt it....So correct me if I am wrong...

After 15Aug 1947 Kashmir was independen neither in India and nor in Pakistan...Only when Pakistan supported Razakars statred comming in than oly King Hari Singh agreed for Kashmir to be part of India.

If Pakistan has not started the infiltration..Kashmir might have been independent today...

tx

 

[ANDUBYLL]

I'm saying Kashmir, in its entirity, is disputed which is recognized as disputed territory by the entire world and the people who have been living in the disputed territory for generations should decide who the disputed territory belongs to.

Can you back that up with facts

 

[Captain03]

Do pakistanis agree that pakistan occupied kashmir is disputed?

we believe it but not any kashmiri
for them it's just plain invasion of their land on india's part

 

[Evil Flare]

Lolz

India always say to world that Kashmir issue should be resolved by both Pakistan & india & no other third party required
at the other hand says Pakistan that Kashmir is their intregal part ...

We'll take Muslim majority Kashmir from India

INSHALLAH

 

[Evil Flare]

Kashmir is one issue abt which whole pakistan is aware of but I don't think even half of India knows abt it....So correct me if I am wrong...

After 15Aug 1947 Kashmir was independen neither in India and nor in Pakistan...Only when Pakistan supported Razakars statred comming in than oly King Hari Singh agreed for Kashmir to be part of India.

If Pakistan has not started the infiltration..Kashmir might have been independent today...

tx

the Barbaric King Hari Singh .
The entire Kashmir Population was Against him at that time

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Doesn't change the fact that majority of Kashmir has belonged to us for the 60 years

Controlled/administered/occupied by India - not 'belonged to India', atleast not according to the UN and majority of the world, including India that accepted both disputed status and plebiscite as a means of resolution in the UN.

 

[Evil Flare]

Doesn't change the fact that majority of Kashmir has belonged to us for the 60 years

British Controlled India for so Long .. not for lifetime

same apply's for Kashmir ...


Sooner or Later you have to Give UP

By Force or Diplomacy ..

 

[Evil Flare]

GoI has always given the right to the people of Kashmir to decide which country they want to be part of.The majority of the Kashmiri people have always chosen to remain with India.

WHEN ???


where is UN Publisite referendum ?

Which Nehru Promised ??


Leave this Matter for Future

 

[Proud2Indian]

the Barbaric King Hari Singh .
The entire Kashmir Population was Against him at that time

I will not discuss whether King HS was barbaric or not.......We can go on endless debate on this......my point is Pakistan invaded the Kashmir and that too without any unrest in region.....this force the HS to go to India...Now if Pakistan has not done that.....may be Kashmir would have been free today.


tx

 

[Proud2Indian]

Controlled/administered/occupied by India - not 'belonged to India', atleast not according to the UN and majority of the world, including India that accepted both disputed status and plebiscite as a means of resolution in the UN.

Well who was the first there illegally...who started all this....and Pls dont bring Hyderabad in all this....even there people came out openly to join India...


tx

 

[jetLi]

Shame on India.
In history, the U.K rules that the karshmir's people and the chieftain both can decide it's side.
I knowe the chieftain wang to join india, but the people want to join Parkistan.
Even fair play, Parkistan and India should have a half each side.
But India you rely on your military occupy most of the karshmir's land.

 

[SSG VIPER]

and is possibly indian territory?

ARE U HIGH??
KASHMIR is indian occupied if not why is more then half a millio presence of indi army where as in AZAD KASHMIR there is almost none??Wat do the kashmiri people have in common with the indians>? A BIG FAT ZERO NOTHING NULL NONE
hence it is occupied let them decide wat they want they want to join PAKISTAN or want a seperate STATE
BASICALLY IT WAS PAKISTANI STATE just like others like hyderabad and MOST PART of indian kashmir but uncle redclif messed it up with NEHRU so
LIVE AND LET LIVE