What's new

No problem with US, India partnership, provided it doesn’t come at Pakistan’s cost: Khawaja Asif

Dalit

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
23,669
Reaction score
-12
Country
Pakistan
Location
Netherlands
Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has said Islamabad does “not have any problem” with the United States developing ties with India, provided that it did not come at Pakistan’s cost.

He expressed these views during an interview with News Week published today (Saturday) where he was asked about India expanding its relationship with the US, as well as ties between Islamabad and New Delhi, particularly in context of the Kashmir issue.

“I think we do not have any problem with the United States developing a partnership with India if it is not at the cost of Pakistan,” he said, adding that Pakistan wanted good relationships with its neighbours and regional partners.

“We have common borders with China, we have common borders with Afghanistan, Iran, India. We would like to improve our relationships with them if the relationship is not good. We want to live in peace. If there is no peace there, we will never be able to restore our economy the way we want to restore it,” he said.

In this connection, he also mentioned that Pakistan’s was a “vulnerable economy” and not a very big one.

“All we have is a geographical location, which is strategic, which attracts, I would say, not all the good things, it sometimes attracts some things which really make us even more vulnerable.”

Asif went on to say, “I personally feel that some appreciation is required in Washington about our situation, and we should not be pushed into a situation where we have to make some very hard choices.

“Our relationship with America for us is very valuable. It has its history. It has some disappointments, some huge disappointments, but still we value our relationship with the United States and we want that relationship to flourish.

“We are big trade partners, we have a very large Pakistani diaspora in the United States and Pakistani interests over there. So, their business interests are also, considering our size, they are quite attractive and large,” Asif said. “This is something which we have to balance and, under the circumstances, under economic pressures, we are finding it difficult, but we survive.”

The defence minister’s comments come ahead of US State Secretary Antony Blinken’s upcoming visit to Beijing on June 18 and 19 and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Washington days later.

In recent times, US President Joe Biden has made deepening ties with India a cornerstone of his efforts to contain China’s expanding influence, with his administration also hoping to persuade India to buy US military drones.

US President Joe Biden’s national security adviser Jake Sullivan recently said the US expects a “transformational moment” in India ties during Modi’s trip while one of Blinken’s objectives in China will be to manage escalation to ensure that the world’s two biggest military powers do not “veer into conflict”.

Regarding Blinken’s China visit, Asif expressed hope that affairs might improve between the two countries.

He said it was difficult for Pakistan in the last few decades to maintain the “balancing act between our relationship with the United States of America and with the regional powers like China, our friends in the Arabian Gulf, Iran, and, of course, the Russian Federation also”.

Further, the defence minister said: “The international geopolitical situation sometimes becomes very difficult for us to balance between different interest groups, or different groups which are jockeying for power and international influence. And Pakistan being a vulnerable country, both economically and strategically, it becomes difficult for us.

“I think I’ll come back to my answer to your original question: once we have economic stability in our country, I think we will really be in a better position to handle this situation. Our vulnerability, economic vulnerability, actually exposes us to so many problems, which sometimes we are unable to tackle.”

‘Anti-minority’ politics in India
Regarding Pakistan’s relations with India, Asif said the latter’s outlook towards regional politics had “completely changed” with Modi’s ascent a decade back.

“If you look at his politics in Gujarat, it was again based on anti-minority, it is based on communal tensions and of voting Hindu nationalist support by fanning sentiments against the community, and minorities, both Muslims, Christians, Buddhists and so many other communities that are very large.

“That has actually aggravated the situation between the two countries, with India taking a very nationalistic stand within the country,” Asif explained.

On Pakistan’s nuclear assets, the minister explained that they were not for any “jingoistic or hostile intentions” but to underline the country’s security.

“India had become a nuclear power. And we were compelled not to be gobbled by India over the years or over the decades. This is something which underwrites the peace in our region and to a great extent, our security. Otherwise, we have absolutely no intentions. Absolutely no.”

He asserted that Pakistan would “never, ever cross that threshold”, adding that nuclear capabilities were “something that just guarantees our independence”.


The beggar is threatening his master with independent foreign policy.
 
. .
If only US or India cares about Pakistan's opinion before developing good relations. Are we living in some sort of parallel world to this minister?

If they did ,both wouldn't have left Afghanistan with their tails between their legs

Pakistan told U.S a long time ago ,India was taking hostile steps against Pakistan in Afghanistan.

Our issues were not resolved which set in motion actions and events that led to the escape from Afghanistan
 
. .
This defence minster whose daughter lives in the US is threatening his master with other options. As if papa America is going to change its stance and listen to the defence minister of Pakistan. This servant is nothing but a minion lackey. His country is ready to default. His people are fleeing abroad. His country cannot secure a miserly billion dollars from a friendly country. Let's see what options this servant is threatening with.
 
.
If they did ,both wouldn't have left Afghanistan with their tails between their legs

Pakistan told U.S a long time ago ,India was taking hostile steps against Pakistan in Afghanistan.

Our issues were not resolved which set in motion actions and events that led to the escape from Afghanistan
Oh it is US loss because TTP is still bombing in Pakistan? India is being requested by the Taliban to come back to Afghanistan while the same Taliban is killing your soldiers at the border. And US doesn't seem to care if you default and is screwing you financially through IMF. Master stroke through out. More such actions please. Lol.
 
.
If only US or India cares about Pakistan's opinion before developing good relations. Are we living in some sort of parallel world to this minister?

If only US or India… the fact that you Indians think you’re some powerful nation is laugh out loud funny. A broke Pakistan under honest leadership will kick your shit in so hard and fast that your grand delusional will drown in sh*t covered, body floating Ganges River faster than you can scam innocent Americans out of their hard earned money. D*thead motherfu*ker
 
.
Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has said Islamabad does “not have any problem” with the United States developing ties with India, provided that it did not come at Pakistan’s cost.

He expressed these views during an interview with News Week published today (Saturday) where he was asked about India expanding its relationship with the US, as well as ties between Islamabad and New Delhi, particularly in context of the Kashmir issue.

“I think we do not have any problem with the United States developing a partnership with India if it is not at the cost of Pakistan,” he said, adding that Pakistan wanted good relationships with its neighbours and regional partners.

“We have common borders with China, we have common borders with Afghanistan, Iran, India. We would like to improve our relationships with them if the relationship is not good. We want to live in peace. If there is no peace there, we will never be able to restore our economy the way we want to restore it,” he said.

In this connection, he also mentioned that Pakistan’s was a “vulnerable economy” and not a very big one.

“All we have is a geographical location, which is strategic, which attracts, I would say, not all the good things, it sometimes attracts some things which really make us even more vulnerable.”

Asif went on to say, “I personally feel that some appreciation is required in Washington about our situation, and we should not be pushed into a situation where we have to make some very hard choices.

“Our relationship with America for us is very valuable. It has its history. It has some disappointments, some huge disappointments, but still we value our relationship with the United States and we want that relationship to flourish.

“We are big trade partners, we have a very large Pakistani diaspora in the United States and Pakistani interests over there. So, their business interests are also, considering our size, they are quite attractive and large,” Asif said. “This is something which we have to balance and, under the circumstances, under economic pressures, we are finding it difficult, but we survive.”

The defence minister’s comments come ahead of US State Secretary Antony Blinken’s upcoming visit to Beijing on June 18 and 19 and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Washington days later.

In recent times, US President Joe Biden has made deepening ties with India a cornerstone of his efforts to contain China’s expanding influence, with his administration also hoping to persuade India to buy US military drones.

US President Joe Biden’s national security adviser Jake Sullivan recently said the US expects a “transformational moment” in India ties during Modi’s trip while one of Blinken’s objectives in China will be to manage escalation to ensure that the world’s two biggest military powers do not “veer into conflict”.

Regarding Blinken’s China visit, Asif expressed hope that affairs might improve between the two countries.

He said it was difficult for Pakistan in the last few decades to maintain the “balancing act between our relationship with the United States of America and with the regional powers like China, our friends in the Arabian Gulf, Iran, and, of course, the Russian Federation also”.

Further, the defence minister said: “The international geopolitical situation sometimes becomes very difficult for us to balance between different interest groups, or different groups which are jockeying for power and international influence. And Pakistan being a vulnerable country, both economically and strategically, it becomes difficult for us.

“I think I’ll come back to my answer to your original question: once we have economic stability in our country, I think we will really be in a better position to handle this situation. Our vulnerability, economic vulnerability, actually exposes us to so many problems, which sometimes we are unable to tackle.”

‘Anti-minority’ politics in India
Regarding Pakistan’s relations with India, Asif said the latter’s outlook towards regional politics had “completely changed” with Modi’s ascent a decade back.

“If you look at his politics in Gujarat, it was again based on anti-minority, it is based on communal tensions and of voting Hindu nationalist support by fanning sentiments against the community, and minorities, both Muslims, Christians, Buddhists and so many other communities that are very large.

“That has actually aggravated the situation between the two countries, with India taking a very nationalistic stand within the country,” Asif explained.

On Pakistan’s nuclear assets, the minister explained that they were not for any “jingoistic or hostile intentions” but to underline the country’s security.

“India had become a nuclear power. And we were compelled not to be gobbled by India over the years or over the decades. This is something which underwrites the peace in our region and to a great extent, our security. Otherwise, we have absolutely no intentions. Absolutely no.”

He asserted that Pakistan would “never, ever cross that threshold”, adding that nuclear capabilities were “something that just guarantees our independence”.


The beggar is threatening his master with independent foreign policy.
He don't need to talk about others relations. Well US stated policy is very clear, they said many times, we look both countries differently ... better focus on IMF dialogue and fix Pak economy, such statements won't make him some kinda national hero. Few years ago he was shopping New York Saks fifth av ....
 
.
Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has said Islamabad does “not have any problem” with the United States developing ties with India, provided that it did not come at Pakistan’s cost.

He expressed these views during an interview with News Week published today (Saturday) where he was asked about India expanding its relationship with the US, as well as ties between Islamabad and New Delhi, particularly in context of the Kashmir issue.

“I think we do not have any problem with the United States developing a partnership with India if it is not at the cost of Pakistan,” he said, adding that Pakistan wanted good relationships with its neighbours and regional partners.

“We have common borders with China, we have common borders with Afghanistan, Iran, India. We would like to improve our relationships with them if the relationship is not good. We want to live in peace. If there is no peace there, we will never be able to restore our economy the way we want to restore it,” he said.

In this connection, he also mentioned that Pakistan’s was a “vulnerable economy” and not a very big one.

“All we have is a geographical location, which is strategic, which attracts, I would say, not all the good things, it sometimes attracts some things which really make us even more vulnerable.”

Asif went on to say, “I personally feel that some appreciation is required in Washington about our situation, and we should not be pushed into a situation where we have to make some very hard choices.

“Our relationship with America for us is very valuable. It has its history. It has some disappointments, some huge disappointments, but still we value our relationship with the United States and we want that relationship to flourish.

“We are big trade partners, we have a very large Pakistani diaspora in the United States and Pakistani interests over there. So, their business interests are also, considering our size, they are quite attractive and large,” Asif said. “This is something which we have to balance and, under the circumstances, under economic pressures, we are finding it difficult, but we survive.”

The defence minister’s comments come ahead of US State Secretary Antony Blinken’s upcoming visit to Beijing on June 18 and 19 and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Washington days later.

In recent times, US President Joe Biden has made deepening ties with India a cornerstone of his efforts to contain China’s expanding influence, with his administration also hoping to persuade India to buy US military drones.

US President Joe Biden’s national security adviser Jake Sullivan recently said the US expects a “transformational moment” in India ties during Modi’s trip while one of Blinken’s objectives in China will be to manage escalation to ensure that the world’s two biggest military powers do not “veer into conflict”.

Regarding Blinken’s China visit, Asif expressed hope that affairs might improve between the two countries.

He said it was difficult for Pakistan in the last few decades to maintain the “balancing act between our relationship with the United States of America and with the regional powers like China, our friends in the Arabian Gulf, Iran, and, of course, the Russian Federation also”.

Further, the defence minister said: “The international geopolitical situation sometimes becomes very difficult for us to balance between different interest groups, or different groups which are jockeying for power and international influence. And Pakistan being a vulnerable country, both economically and strategically, it becomes difficult for us.

“I think I’ll come back to my answer to your original question: once we have economic stability in our country, I think we will really be in a better position to handle this situation. Our vulnerability, economic vulnerability, actually exposes us to so many problems, which sometimes we are unable to tackle.”

‘Anti-minority’ politics in India
Regarding Pakistan’s relations with India, Asif said the latter’s outlook towards regional politics had “completely changed” with Modi’s ascent a decade back.

“If you look at his politics in Gujarat, it was again based on anti-minority, it is based on communal tensions and of voting Hindu nationalist support by fanning sentiments against the community, and minorities, both Muslims, Christians, Buddhists and so many other communities that are very large.

“That has actually aggravated the situation between the two countries, with India taking a very nationalistic stand within the country,” Asif explained.

On Pakistan’s nuclear assets, the minister explained that they were not for any “jingoistic or hostile intentions” but to underline the country’s security.

“India had become a nuclear power. And we were compelled not to be gobbled by India over the years or over the decades. This is something which underwrites the peace in our region and to a great extent, our security. Otherwise, we have absolutely no intentions. Absolutely no.”

He asserted that Pakistan would “never, ever cross that threshold”, adding that nuclear capabilities were “something that just guarantees our independence”.


The beggar is threatening his master with independent foreign policy.
Dumb defence minister of gutter brigade doesn't understand its at the Pakistan cost.
While Pakistani worthless, brainless politicians and generals are lured for the lolly pops of green cards and visas to sell there mothers and fight wars for them. Indian defence and economic sectors are being modernised with the sensitive and advanced Western technologies. Tragedy of the Pakistani nation is we always had and still have donkeys at the helm in front and behind the scenes. Economic and foreign policies are not decided and designed in the parade grounds.
 
.
Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has said Islamabad does “not have any problem” with the United States developing ties with India, provided that it did not come at Pakistan’s cost.

He expressed these views during an interview with News Week published today (Saturday) where he was asked about India expanding its relationship with the US, as well as ties between Islamabad and New Delhi, particularly in context of the Kashmir issue.

“I think we do not have any problem with the United States developing a partnership with India if it is not at the cost of Pakistan,” he said, adding that Pakistan wanted good relationships with its neighbours and regional partners.

“We have common borders with China, we have common borders with Afghanistan, Iran, India. We would like to improve our relationships with them if the relationship is not good. We want to live in peace. If there is no peace there, we will never be able to restore our economy the way we want to restore it,” he said.

In this connection, he also mentioned that Pakistan’s was a “vulnerable economy” and not a very big one.

“All we have is a geographical location, which is strategic, which attracts, I would say, not all the good things, it sometimes attracts some things which really make us even more vulnerable.”

Asif went on to say, “I personally feel that some appreciation is required in Washington about our situation, and we should not be pushed into a situation where we have to make some very hard choices.

“Our relationship with America for us is very valuable. It has its history. It has some disappointments, some huge disappointments, but still we value our relationship with the United States and we want that relationship to flourish.

“We are big trade partners, we have a very large Pakistani diaspora in the United States and Pakistani interests over there. So, their business interests are also, considering our size, they are quite attractive and large,” Asif said. “This is something which we have to balance and, under the circumstances, under economic pressures, we are finding it difficult, but we survive.”

The defence minister’s comments come ahead of US State Secretary Antony Blinken’s upcoming visit to Beijing on June 18 and 19 and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Washington days later.

In recent times, US President Joe Biden has made deepening ties with India a cornerstone of his efforts to contain China’s expanding influence, with his administration also hoping to persuade India to buy US military drones.

US President Joe Biden’s national security adviser Jake Sullivan recently said the US expects a “transformational moment” in India ties during Modi’s trip while one of Blinken’s objectives in China will be to manage escalation to ensure that the world’s two biggest military powers do not “veer into conflict”.

Regarding Blinken’s China visit, Asif expressed hope that affairs might improve between the two countries.

He said it was difficult for Pakistan in the last few decades to maintain the “balancing act between our relationship with the United States of America and with the regional powers like China, our friends in the Arabian Gulf, Iran, and, of course, the Russian Federation also”.

Further, the defence minister said: “The international geopolitical situation sometimes becomes very difficult for us to balance between different interest groups, or different groups which are jockeying for power and international influence. And Pakistan being a vulnerable country, both economically and strategically, it becomes difficult for us.

“I think I’ll come back to my answer to your original question: once we have economic stability in our country, I think we will really be in a better position to handle this situation. Our vulnerability, economic vulnerability, actually exposes us to so many problems, which sometimes we are unable to tackle.”

‘Anti-minority’ politics in India
Regarding Pakistan’s relations with India, Asif said the latter’s outlook towards regional politics had “completely changed” with Modi’s ascent a decade back.

“If you look at his politics in Gujarat, it was again based on anti-minority, it is based on communal tensions and of voting Hindu nationalist support by fanning sentiments against the community, and minorities, both Muslims, Christians, Buddhists and so many other communities that are very large.

“That has actually aggravated the situation between the two countries, with India taking a very nationalistic stand within the country,” Asif explained.

On Pakistan’s nuclear assets, the minister explained that they were not for any “jingoistic or hostile intentions” but to underline the country’s security.

“India had become a nuclear power. And we were compelled not to be gobbled by India over the years or over the decades. This is something which underwrites the peace in our region and to a great extent, our security. Otherwise, we have absolutely no intentions. Absolutely no.”

He asserted that Pakistan would “never, ever cross that threshold”, adding that nuclear capabilities were “something that just guarantees our independence”.


The beggar is threatening his master with independent foreign policy.
Well if USA does to much favouritism to India, then Pakistan may align with China and Russia more closely.
 
.
This is a non issue as far as I’m concerned.

1. This clown is speaking on behalf of the GHQ - the Generals have no problem with the US entering a “partnership”.

The “partnership”
In recent times, US President Joe Biden has made deepening ties with India a cornerstone of his efforts to contain China’s expanding influence, with his administration also hoping to persuade India to buy US military drones.

This is exactly what you have to say.

/End
 
.
In recent times, US President Joe Biden has made deepening ties with India a cornerstone of his efforts to contain China’s expanding influence, with his administration also hoping to persuade India to buy US military drones.

In bold, is the bottom line.

And here is a direct quote from US foreign policy... "There are no permanent enemies, and no permanent friends, only permanent interests".

Not sure why jumping up and down when US sells goodies to India.
 
.
Imran Khan supporters are becoming insufferable worse then Indians @Dalit what the fuk bro. I was Imran Khan supporter as well but this is too much and taking it to far

If only US or India cares about Pakistan's opinion before developing good relations. Are we living in some sort of parallel world to this minister?

Who is this fuking Indian.. Losing Pakistan will be far bigger loss for the US then with India. Pakistan can connnect the entire Muslim Eurasia and added to Chinese block.

They will honestly flourish in ways the US can't even comphrend hence a break-up is honestly even in the best interest of the region and everyone..

The US has more needs for Pakistan then it is the other way around and we will prosper breaking not only us but the whole region will
 
Last edited:
.
I read an article once which said that in the US State Department Middle East section there wasn’t a single person who wasn’t Jewish. US Middle East policy is run entirely by Jews.

I would say with 90% certainty that today the US South Asia policy is run entirely by Hindus from India.

American policy towards India is based on offering massive investment, including Apple moving their production there. They even want to manufacture high tech products like semiconductors in India. They’re planning to turn India into an economic powerhouse to rival China.

On the other hand, US policy towards Pakistan is based on blackmail and threats. They want Pakistan to give up relations with China, accept Indian hegemony and let the US control Pakistani nukes.

If Pakistan does all that the US will give the generals a few visas and keep Pakistan dirt poor and dysfunctional. That’s the best that Pakistan will get.

Bajwa and Asim Munir have already accepted US demands and are implementing the policy.
 
.
I read an article once which said that in the US State Department Middle East section there wasn’t a single person who wasn’t Jewish. US Middle East policy is run entirely by Jews.

I would say with 90% certainty that today the US South Asia policy is run entirely by Hindus from India.

American policy towards India is based on offering massive investment, including Apple moving their production there. They even want to manufacture high tech products like semiconductors in India. They’re planning to turn India into an economic powerhouse to rival China.

On the other hand, US policy towards Pakistan is based on blackmail and threats. They want Pakistan to give up relations with China, accept Indian hegemony and let the US control Pakistani nukes.

If Pakistan does all that the US will give the generals a few visas and keep Pakistan dirt poor and dysfunctional. That’s the best that Pakistan will get.

Bajwa and Asim Munir have already accepted US demands and are implementing the policy.

wrong.. We have always been viewed as an enemy and threat by them.. It didn't begin today. They see us as competitior in washtington. They have regretted breaking up with Saudi Arabia but they will regret breaking up with Pakistan 100 times more.

Americans deep down view us as the most dangerous country in the world that is what Biden said recently and he was being honest..

They don't see the Indians as nothing more then cannon fodders but as for us they see competitiive potential in us (Unfortunately one the Pakistani's never have seen in themselves) and as an enemy.

They believe deep down we harbour world domination motive (which is incorrect by the way) and they see us potential replacement in the world hegemony but we don't see that potential in ourselves in fact they have better view on us lol then we have of ourselves
 
Last edited:
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom