What's new

‘No nation is more important than India as US seeks to counter China’

Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Messages
1,460
Reaction score
-3
Country
India
Location
India
‘No nation is more important than India as US seeks to counter China’
PTI | Updated on April 13, 2021

The parallels between America's dependency on China for manufacturing and its dependency on India for IT services are striking, says a think tank
Washington, Apr 13 A leading think tank for science and technology policy has said as Washington seeks to counter a rising China no nation is more important than India with its abundance of highly skilled technical professionals and strong political and cultural ties with the United States.
It, however, cautioned that "overreliance" on India as an IT services provider could become a strategic problem if major disagreements emerge between the two nations on issues such as intellectual property, data governance, tariffs, taxation, local content requirements or individual privacy.
The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) think-tank in a report released on Monday describes the worst- and best-case scenarios.
In one, tensions between India and China are reduced and the many business synergies between these two neighbouring nations come to the fore. In this case, the heart of the global economy would shift to the east, and there would be little the United States could do about it, the report stated.

In the second scenario, the interests of India and the United States become increasingly aligned, as the economic, military, and international relations challenges from China grow. In such a case, democratic norms could prevail across most of the developed world, as developing nations start looking to a 'Delhi model' instead of a 'Beijing model', it stated.
"As America seeks to counter a rising China, no nation is more important than India, with its vast size, an abundance of highly skilled technical professionals, and strong political and cultural ties with the United States.
"But the parallels between America's dependency on China for manufacturing and its dependency on India for IT services are striking," said the think-tank.
According to David Moschella, a non-resident senior fellow at ITIF and co-author of the report, the same forces that increasingly divide the United States and China are now pushing the US and India closer together.
"The interplay between the United States, India, and China will shape global competition and digital innovation for years to come. While there is a wide range of possible scenarios, two things are clear: India should be an essential part of US efforts to compete with and reduce its dependence on China, and this will inevitably expand America's global dependencies from manufacturing to services,” he said.
"America's technology dependencies on India in the 2020s seem certain to rise. Yet it is important to know whether the United States will be dependent on a strategic partner with strong mutual interests, or on an increasingly neutral rival," said ITIF president Robert D. Atkinson, who co-authored the report with Moschella.
Much will depend on the strategic choices that the Joe Biden administration and Indian government make in the next several years. One thing is clear that economic and geopolitical stakes could not be higher, he said.
The report describes how India is making important progress in research and development, innovation centres, machine learning, analytics, product design and testing, and other areas, especially in IT and life sciences.
While leading US tech companies are well-positioned in India's booming Internet and e-commerce marketplaces, strong local competitors are now emerging. Outside the technology sector, US companies operating in India face stiff competition from Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Indian, and other firms.
Although doing business in India is still often difficult, most large US companies have expanded significantly to having IT service providers, large operations, or their own India-based capability centres, the report stated.

 
. . . . .
or uncha chrdhao pandi ji

1618415014403.png
 
. .
good decision by usa. at least india don't change policy on phone calls.
 
. . .
Salaam

That statement is indeed true in some regards.

The Indians do possess the heft needed to in some way stand up to China (with the backing of the West), unlike the Australians (for instance). This alignment fits very well within the goals of the US with regards to China.

I don't really know whether it is actually good for India or not to jump into this fight though. Unlike the US, the Indians have a long way to go with regards to improving the lot of its citizens. In fact, the US citizens have actually suffered greatly because of these foreign conflicts the US has wasted resources on.

In fact, it was the long protracted war in the middle east that really allowed China to emerge unopposed as the US wasted it's time and resources.

I don't know whether the Indians could make long term strategic gains whilst maintaining an obvious confrontation with China (with which it shares a massive border in addition to everything else).

My guess is that the Indians can be very helpful for the Americans in guarding American interests. I doubt this whole thing would actually be very useful for the Indian people or the long term development of the Indians themselves.

I, however, do think that open opposition of the Indians is a great help for Pakistan which has to compensate for its lack of resources in the face of a much larger adversary.

With Indian intentions clear, the Chinese are also being more open about supporting and indeed propping up Pakistan to bleed the Indians and increase the cost of conflict for them. This obviously increases Pakistan's importance for them, something which Pakistan has relied upon historically to be able to match India.

The Chinese would've played a lot more carefully had the Indians not gone out so openly and started to work with their enemies against them.

The events are unfolding in that way, it seems, yet again.

Otherwise, the fact of the matter is the size difference between Pakistan and India is too great to be compensated for meaningfully for as long as it has been.

So, in short, I doubt this is as good a news for the Indians as it is for the Americans. In fact, I think it may even be a better thing for Pakistan than India even.
 
. . .
.
Can you provide ANY independent and genuine evidence that confirms this?
Here is original article by David Moschella and Robert Atkinson.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom