What's new

No Muslim voice in the UNSC ?

If that's the arguement then why shouldn't Israel have a permanent seat?
And why stop there? North Korea, the only Juche state in the world, is also excluded. And what about Jamaica? We can't leave Rastafarians without a voice.

A typical redneck attitude, a proper reply should be why have a despotic system at the UN? There's no need for permanent status of any countries, it goes against democratic principles and those who will go at any length to keep it the way it is are all so-called champions of democracy!
 
Majority of Arab countries were allied with Soviet block except the Saudis.

not only the saudis but the remaining gulfis plus indonesia, brunei, malaysia, pakistan and turkey.

but yes, the remaining were eastern bloc.

though even in the first line, there were socialist groups in most of the them.

I can assure you then and now the oil is the single most important factor. Without it ISIS running over Syria and Saddam running over Saudi will each have got the same response that Joseph Kony trying to take over states in Africa bring about.

the americans were investigating ethanol in the 70's and 80's... saudi oil was easy access yes but western control of saudia ( the country enclosing makkah and madinah ) has been crucial for western intel agencies spreading wahabism and deobandism.

what isis?? syria is in the middle of a five-year regime-change war... huzoor, i am getting tired of your anti-socialist anti-muslim stand... you must change your attitude.

kony?? the single-most critical change in africa in four decades is the regime-change in libya.

you must look at things in big-picture way.

and how can you seriously equate isil and saddam??

Its of little use to be in this debating club.

true... uno has merely become a rubber-stamp for nato.
 
Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait give multi-billion dollars business to US military and NATO.

Why no Muslim voice in the United Nations Security council (UNSC) ?

The GCC arabs bribe the US and iran leads the muslim world , spiritual wise , and that's how it works
 
If that's the arguement then why shouldn't Israel have a permanent seat?
And why stop there? North Korea, the only Juche state in the world, is also excluded. And what about Jamaica? We can't leave Rastafarians without a voice.
Does Any of them located in 52 countries? Or are they 1.2 billion in population ?
 


India is among the countries that has contributed the most to peacekeeping forces and its contribution has been praised world-over.

India's history is testimony to the fact that it has never indulged in aggression and attacked any country.

"Those days are gone when India had to beg. Now we want our right. No other country has such moral authority,"

"If that country does not get the Security Council membership, has to wait for 70 years, peace is in whose DNA...there should be justice to that country. A lot of time has passed,"

"Our membership will also be beneficial to the world. We both would like to see tangible progress in the United Nations Security Council reforms during the 70th Anniversary year of the United Nations,"
 
why not? iran fights for islam and that the saudi women can't stand

please don't misunderstand... i am not criticizing the irani people... i am only in opposition to the iran establishment ( the mullahs ) who are no different than the saudis or the deobandi mullahs of india... in fact, their nationalism i find similar to the hindu party bjp in india.

for me and many others, muammar gaddafi is the imam of all muslims, whether he is really dead or otherwise.

but more immediately, i am a socialist so for me, only socialist societies or a future communist humanity can bring real spiritual peace and harmony. :)
 
please don't misunderstand... i am not criticizing the irani people... i am only in opposition to the iran establishment ( the mullahs ) who are no different than the saudis or the deobandi mullahs of india... in fact, their nationalism i find similar to the hindu party bjp in india.

for me and many others, muammar gaddafi is the imam of all muslims, whether he is really dead or otherwise.

but more immediately, i am a socialist so for me, only socialist societies or a future communist humanity can bring real spiritual peace and harmony. :)

feel free to criticize the irani people , i don't consider myself part of them , and there exists no nationalism in iran , iran is devouted to fight for islam and please the numerically seuperior arabs ; infact iran lives in the 19th century

quote from the grand ayatollah "let this thing "iran" be burned and destroyed for islam shall be triumphant " ....
 
Indian operation in Yemen helps 26 countries and the same spirit was shown during Nepal Earthquake, Providing water to Maldives, cheaper medicine for Africa, Asia and Latin American countries, can help other nations for their civilian nuclear programme under IAEA safeguards, have carried out thousands of peace keeping missions worldwide.
 
i don't consider myself part of them

why do you say that??

and there exists no nationalism in iran

from my distant perspective, iran government is nationalistic in a way that it wishes to bring its understanding of islam to other countries, especially to gcc, so this be termed transnational.

iran is devouted to fight for islam

the government and the military certainly are... i don't know if the ordinary people are.

and please the numerically seuperior arabs

there is that.

infact iran lives in the 19th century

well, from the photos in the "this paradise is called iran", it is at least better than most of the current muslim countries, though you can tell me of the living conditions there.

quote from the grand ayatollah "let this thing "iran" be burned and destroyed for islam shall be triumphant " ....

the current one or khomeini??
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom