Let's see; let's take it in sequence.
- The people who brought Indo-Aryan themselves, and imposed that language on the existing Dravidian and Austric languages then prevailing; now identified with Hindu upper castes;
- The Greeks, who have left descendants behind in the upper reaches of the hills of the north-west;
- The Scythians and Parthians, rulers over western India, whose traces are still to be found over Gujarat and Rajasthan, who formed one stream of the reputed ancestors of tribes and ethnic groups that now represent the cream of India's defendants;
- The Kushan, who, together with the Scythians and the Parthians, the Saka and the Pahlava, are thought by most historians to have formed the basis of Gujjar, of Rajput and of Jat; these, ironically, being among the stoutest defenders of India against later invaders;
- The Persians, the Turks and ultimately the Mongols and Turco-Mongolian tribes, who were resisted fiercely by the descendants of earlier invaders, then settled in as 'you or me', in your own words;
Each of them has settled in and become Indian. Those who were not willing to, who made a fuss about their distinct descent, now live elsewhere, not in India.
Irrelevant and ill-informed.
He loved Kabul, and Kabul counted as part of his empire, along with other parts of what was always India, until the British and Mr. Radcliffe came along.
Most uneducated bigots are confused; they are not alone.
There is another bunch of the confused who celebrate the glories of Lahore, the seat of the Sikh Empire.