No military in the world can match up to Pakistan Army: Gen Raheel

[FunkyGen]

Should we not be talking about the advanced tech. we lack of to protect our homeland rather than praising the shit out of ourselves...
India recently has tested a barrage of missiles which pose a serious threat to our physical national security...

Do we have the time and is it the right moment? unless of course you believe in the angels that are going to descend from the heaven to save us...

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Army chief General Raheel Sharif on Thursday said no military in the world has been able to synergise effects as much as the Pakistan Army has single-handedly.

Addressing the participants at Command and Staff College in Quetta, General Raheel said he is proud of commanding, dynamic and resolute force, Director General Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) Lt-Gen Asim Saleem Bajwa said.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/1110758/army-chief-departs-day-long-visit-quetta/

Well said Pakistan 100% is behind our Military

 

[Jamwal's]

So what, after 6-7 years, they came back and took control of 70pc of Afghanistan.
It was always going to be a long war like Vietnam genius, the same Taliban now roam in most of the Afghan Southern and Western areas. Guerrilla war is a lot different than conventional war, and a weaker side conducts that war against a stronger side.

LMAO
When Najeeb died, he was not thinking like you.


If you wanted communist infiltration and Pakistan to become a satellite of USSR then yes.


The object of a guerrilla war is to remain a continuous "nuisance" for the enemy to a point where he is forced to leave your territory. When that objective is achieved, it is considered a victory for the weaker side that has been conducting guerrilla warfare.
If you think that the losses suffered by the USSR were sustainable in the long term then you need some serious reading.


And Soviets were winning inside Afghanistan, right?
Let me remind you, leaving their economy aside, their losses were still unsustainable in the long term, even if they were economically stronger, they had to vacate not only Afghanistan. We were already planning to ignite an Islamic insurgency in Central Asia as well. Think again, they had to withdraw sooner or later, no matter what the shape of their economy.

And none of this related to my post.

 

[LeGenD]

ISAF not alone... In Afghanistan USAF/USARMY there with their full force and hardware. They're not doing for what they're for what purpose they attack Afghanistan still majority of Afghan part under control by Talibans. On the other side, provides umbrella to ANA, NDS, RAW in Afghanistan (Chuk Hagel Ex-Defence Secertary US said: India is using Afghanistan as second front against Pakistan. India is involve in destabilization of Pakistan from Afghanistan).

Pakistan has fire fighting force. Except US and Pakistan, no other country in the world continuously engaging in Wars since past many many years.

US never committed itself fully to Afghanistan; it opened new fronts during the course of WoT and diverted precious resources to those fronts. Nonetheless, reforming Afghanistan is a far greater challenge then curbing militancy in some parts of Pakistan. A comparison is not feasible due to these variables.

Talibans fuked Amerekans in Afghanistan now first Americans removed Talibans from their terrorists lists (Talibans no more terrorists according to US) and now they're engaging with them from past many many years. America lost war in Vietnam with super duper weapons. kya chawal mari hey Nair sahab nay with 11000 posts

Pakistan army have suffered much more casualties then the US forces in Afghanistan during battles with Taliban. More importantly, casualties do not tell us anything about the situation on the ground and who has performed better in combat roles.

Taliban are no match for the US forces in a battle, but they are an ideological force and therefore would not run out of recruits and continue to disrupt peace in Afghanistan.

Can you please remind us again who took out the USSR? Here's a hint, it certainly wasn't the NATO alliance.

But the weapons they supplied were instrumental in turning the tide of that war.

I think you are calculating in direct comparison. what he said is about the skills and achievements. US with all B series bombers, missiles gunships and the most high tech weapons and intelligence, faile to defeat all Taliban infact 50% of Afghanista is practically under Taliban control. they cannot go out from kabul red zone even.

on the other side the whole border area has been cleaned by Pakistan army and there are ground radars and checkposts to stop any possible insurgency.

Actually, this is a misconception.

US forces have conducted operations in Taliban-dominated areas as well and occupied their southern stronghold Kandahar for a long time. Taliban may look formidable in maps but those maps don't tell you the big picture.

Taliban is an ideological force so it will retain its influence and reach in some parts of Afghanistan irrespective of military operations against them. Reason is that Taliban continues to get new recruits from the public sympathetic to their cause.

 

[Rank]

Pakistan army have suffered much more casualties then the US forces in Afghanistan during battles with Taliban. More importantly, casualties do not tell us a nything about the situation on the ground and who has performed better in combat roles.

Because Pakistan continuously engaging with them in the ground rather sitting in the barracks in Kabul. That is the main reason our causalities are higher.

 

[LeGenD]

No nation on earth now or that has ever existed in the whole history of mankind has ever had to face the virtual impossible military odds that Pakistan has to face on a daily basis. Since our inception, Pakistan has had to face an eternal enemy 8 times our size that has abundant access to the world's most powerful weapons and has the full backing of the entire west and Russia. We are deprived of this privilege even though we are 8 times smaller than our enemy. On top of all of that the world's most powerful military america has listed Pakistan for termination in the "plans for a new american century". The americans and israelis would not even survive against these odds. The fact that Pakistan has survived against these impossible odds is no less than a miracle and testament to the power and potential of the Pakistani race. No nation on earth that has ever existed has had to face these odds. Countless nations have been destroyed or wiped out facing lesser odds.

So General Raheel is correct when he says that no other military on earth has ever had to face our impossible odds and manage to survive. Pakistanis must celebrate this and never underestimate this miracle of an achievement.




Such an achievement fighting an enemy 8 times smaller than you.

I disagree.

1. Finland resisted a major invasion effort of USSR for 6 months during the era of WW2. The performance of Finland convinced Hitler that USSR had a poor military force and would be easily tackled. You know what happened afterwards.

2. Britain was the only European nation to give Germans a second-thought about invading its mainland by defeating it in the air-to-air engagements.

3. Israel defeated a coalition of six Arab nations during 1967 war in a span of 6 days. Israel faced similar odds in 1973 as well.

I am sure that there would be more examples, if I include ancient history.

americans are only good at killing super poor starving babies, children, women and men in the developing world. They are baby killers. The americans have NEVER recently been tested against an adequate or suitable adversary. Only then can you judge the true power of the americans. They are inhuman devils.

Iraq was a worthy foe during 1991 with the 4th largest military force in the world (and the strongest in the Middle East) back then.

 

[litman]

we saw such statements after salala and the OBL incidents. nothing more then empty slogans.

 

[LeGenD]

Because Pakistan continuously engaging with them in the ground rather sitting in the barracks in Kabul. That is the main reason our causalities are higher.

No.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_military_operations_in_the_war_in_Afghanistan_(2001–present)

 

[MastanKhan]

Hi,

Another new tech that Ghengis Khan used was psychological warfare---.

On the first day of the siege of the city---there would be a large white tent placed in front of the city---stating that surrender and all lives will be spared---.

2nd day---there would be a Red tent would replace the white tent----meaning---surrender and all males will be executed---and women and children spared.

On the third day---the Black tent would go up----meaning---the city will be conquered and everyone would be killed.


Another new tech that they utilized in the region was SIGNALS thru blow horns----the shape of the whole battle front could be changed with a certain sound of the horn---. Different troops were trained to manouever differently to different sounds of the horn.

Messenger service---the Khan's messenger had the right to the road----horse relay stations were built around every 20 miles----for fresh horses food and shelter---it was called the YAM route----the riders were called Yamshchiks---.

The horses had bells around their necks---when the station attendant heard the bells---he knew the yam rider was coming and would have the horse ready for him.

No one dare stop the Yam rider---no prince---no general---no commander---dare stop the Yam rider---not even the Khan's guards---. The Yam rider had the right to deliver the message into the hands of the Great Khan---or whosoever he was directed to deliver by the Khan. Anyone interfering was executed right at the spot.

There was a designated command structure----

10---100---1000---10000

Arban---Zun---Minghan---Tumen---.

The attack on russia during winter was unique in tactics----it was a winter attack---nobody dared attack russia in winter---but the mongols did---and totally annihilated the enemy---.

Each unit had a majority group or archers and a minority group of heavy equipped warriors.

 

[Pandora]

Abhi Kal parsson ki baat hair kay American hamrai Qoam kay pichwaray pay Hell fire maar kay gaye hein. The best army of the world which cant even shoot down a fuckin drone.

 

[Airdef95]

True but I believe technology alone isn't the deciding factor. Sq.ldr MM Alam who shot down 5 indian planes in 90 seconds once said that it is the will to fight that determines the outcome of a war. History is full of such stories. Remember the U.S. War in Vietnam??

 

[Joe Shearer]

What new tech did Genghis Khan posses?

We are only allowed to give you "Thanks", a "Positive Rating" and a "Negative Rating". Lucky you.

 

[dray]

No army in the WORLD can match up to Pakistan Army: Gen Raheel after losing his mind.

 

[Joe Shearer]

So let me get this straight, the soviets weren't able to defeat the Afghan and Pakistan coalition because first they weren't able to find them with their sophisticated weapons, superior firepower and technology against a foe on horse back, second they were multiplying within seconds like cockroaches and overwhelmed the Russians with just superior breeding ROFL and this guy is accusing me of being delusional and learn what history your superior breeding one?

If I continue to respond to this buthurt idiotic baniya, his buthurtness might rub off on me lol

I couldn't care less about buthurt (sic) or idiotic; they betray themselves, not least in the atrocious spelling. But calling me or any other Indian baniya is not acceptable. A very gentle suggestion: edit your post and remove the word.

No nation on earth now or that has ever existed in the whole history of mankind has ever had to face the virtual impossible military odds that Pakistan has to face on a daily basis. Since our inception, Pakistan has had to face an eternal enemy 8 times our size that has abundant access to the world's most powerful weapons and has the full backing of the entire west and Russia. We are deprived of this privilege even though we are 8 times smaller than our enemy. On top of all of that the world's most powerful military america has listed Pakistan for termination in the "plans for a new american century". The americans and israelis would not even survive against these odds. The fact that Pakistan has survived against these impossible odds is no less than a miracle and testament to the power and potential of the Pakistani race. No nation on earth that has ever existed has had to face these odds. Countless nations have been destroyed or wiped out facing lesser odds.

So General Raheel is correct when he says that no other military on earth has ever had to face our impossible odds and manage to survive. Pakistanis must celebrate this and never underestimate this miracle of an achievement.




Such an achievement fighting an enemy 8 times smaller than you.




americans are only good at killing super poor starving babies, children, women and men in the developing world. They are baby killers. The americans have NEVER recently been tested against an adequate or suitable adversary. Only then can you judge the true power of the americans. They are inhuman devils.

An intelligent analysis.

The rough equivalent of saying,"Since we learnt how to wipe our noses, we kept rushing into heavy traffic, and survived. As if heavy traffic wanted anything to do with you.

Did you not see your million strong army peeing at the border for two years?

I'm afraid that's wishful thinking. If the million strong army had peed at your borders, you wouldn't have been posting this here today.

 

[Omega007]

What new tech did Genghis Khan posses?

Composite bows!!