its not about sources, its about trends and deductions. WHo is naive here that Pakistan was not and is still not training militants?I dunno the variety or missions of all of them, ut at least we know some were and are trainined for Kashmir jihad". no? where were the militants who attacked Uri, Pananthakot etc trained? Offcourse in Pakistan. US knows Pakistan trains militants too, so dont be naive. US knows where Pakistans nukes are why wont they know which militants are trained in Pakistan and where? If you feel Pakistan is not training militants, then you are just in denial. Its an easy deduction that Pakistan govt trains militants. You think afghan taliban dont train in pakistan and Pakistan govt turns a blind eye? sorry, am not naive.
Please tell me how did u deduce this conclusion then?
I'll show u some for an example
1) Terrorists attack in India, India says that surely they got weapons and training from somewhere and Pakistan being the enemy could be a likely culprit.
Let's assume that Pakistan is behind it being enemy and all
Then how do u explain terrorist attacks in Pak?
Is India behind it? Where r the ones attacking Pak getting weapons/training/funding?
India's position is that it's Pakistan's policies that backfired. So tell me r we training/funding these terrorists so they can attack us and then spending some more money to fight them and destroy our economy? Does that make much sense to u?
Following the line of thought provided above, it's more likely that both enemies r having proxy wars and supporting terrorists in each other's countries.
In that case Indians should stop acting angelic as if they can do no wrong and it's Pakistan's fault in everything.
2) Another scenario could be that India isn't supporting those terrorists attacking Pakistan(their money/weapons appear out of thin air somehow) and they r disgruntled/angry citizens that have taken arms against the gov of Pak.
In that case it could also apply to India. What if those behind Uri/Pathankot/etc. attacks are just dissatisfied/angry Indians?
But according to India that can never be
According to Indian logic:
- Terrorist attack in India --> Pakistan's fault
- Terrorist attack in Pak --> Pakistan's fault
- US issues a statement agreeing with India --> Must be true
- US issues a statement in favor of Pak --> US is hypocrite