Penguin
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 13,047
- Reaction score
- 56
This has nothing to do with my understanding of international law. You mention 3 things: housing, medical care and integration. The first 2 can easily be accommodated, since they are a matter of money, and the EU is in many ways a money pump. As for the latter, really a better explanation is needed. How is it that Romania, with some 18k natives to 1 refugee currently, cannot integrate more? Esp. when most of your neighbours succeed at that much better. See data on total population, refugee population, natives per refugee :That is the number we can accomodate,provide medical assistance and integration into society.Beyond that we're full.That is the case Romania will be arguing to the next European meeting on migration,we are rejecting mandatory quotas.You better brush up on your international law ,these peope are refugees in the first safe country they enter,beyond that they are illegal migrants.It really isn't so hard to comprehend,you just can't argue that fleeing Turkey,Serbia,Greece,etc ,which are safe countries,makes you a runaway from a war zone..
Serbia : 9,850,000 / 70,707 / 139
Bulgaria : 7,364,570 / 5,688 / 1295
Hungary : 10,031,208 / 5,106 / 1965
Slovakia : 5,413,548 / 546 / 9915
Ukraine : 46,029,281 / 3,176 / 14493
Romania : 19,042,936 / 1,005 / 18948
Moldova : 3,567,500 / 146 / 24435
Oh, so the Romanians just have a chip on their shoulder versus some other EU countries and refuse because of that?Heck,we fulfilled all Schengen criterias years ago but your country and Germany still denied us acces,contrary to EU law.We have no reason to show solidarity with your politicians..
Last edited: