What's new

'No direct role of Army in July 25 elections,' DG ISPR tells Senate committee

Norwegian

BANNED
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
19,001
Reaction score
11
Country
Israel
Location
Norway
5b5041430599f.png

Maj Gen Asif Ghafoor attends Senate's standing committee on interior on Thursday. — DawnNewsTV

Director General of Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) Maj Gen Asif Ghafoor on Thursday, reiterating his stance from a press conference held earlier this month, rejected the notion that the security forces have any direct role in how the July 25 elections will unfold.

Speaking at the special session of the Senate Standing Committee on Interior, DG ISPR clarified that the army personnel are only following the Election Commission of Pakistan's instructions.

"There were some rumours that army personnel had been issued 'different' orders — this is completely baseless," he said. "We do not have any link with the elections; we are only working on the election commission's directives to improve the law and order situation. We do not have a direct role in polls."

Read: Gen Bajwa directs army to perform election duties 'with utmost responsibility'


Major General Ghafoor then elaborated the election duty assigned to army personnel, saying: "The armed forces have always lent support to civil institutions. The security situation is being improved in the entire country to hold elections.

"Three hundred and seventy one thousand army soldiers will be deployed at the countrywide polling stations. The army is also performing its duty at the printing press [for ballots]."

When asked by PML-N Senator Kulsoom Parveen to disclose the number of troops being deployed in Balochistan — where a suicide blast at a political event killed around 150 people — the DG ISPR said: "Leave the planning side to us; we know how many troops have to be deployed where. We have analysed every place from a security point of view. We have made deployments as per the need in Balochistan."

Maj Gen Ghafoor, however, made it clear that the army's role in providing security for elections did not mean that it would also take direct responsibility for the well being of politicians.

"The army is not taking direct responsibility for the security of any politician," he said. "The security of political candidates is the responsibility of the government of Pakistan and the ECP. We are assisting the election commission for security during polling.

"Unfortunately, until the police's abilities improve, we will also have to do police duty."

Speaking of coordination with Afghanistan, the ISPR spokesperson said that Pakistan has been assured of reciprocal support from the Afghan side on the security front. "When the elections took place in Afghanistan, we took extraordinary measures on this side of the border. This time, the Afghan president phoned Pakistan prime minister and the army chief to assure us of their cooperation."

The Senate session was presided over by the committee chairperson Senator Rehman Malik. Federal interior and defence secretaries, secretary ECP and several other government officials were also present in the meeting.

Army personnel will work under the presiding officer: ECP secretary
In the same session, ECP Secretary Babar Yaqoob also briefed the Senate body over the army's electoral duties among other things.

"A total of 800,000 security officials and 700,000 ECP staff will perform their duties," he said. "Bearing in mind the events of 2013, the ECP took the decision to deploy army. We are grateful to the army. Their officers are also being trained. The army's help was also obtained to keep a watch on ballot papers."

Yaqoob denied that army personnel would have a free role at the polling stations. "A perception has been given that the army personnel would have a free role — this is wrong," he said. "The army personnel will work under the presiding officer at polling stations."

Senator Javed Abbasi asked whether army is deployed inside and outside [the polling stations] in other countries as well. To this, the ECP secretary said that the decision was taken in the light of "the security situation of our country and the threats coming to the polling stations according to the Nacta (National Counter Terrorism Authority Pakistan) briefing".

"So we would obviously have asked the army and police to improve security," he added
 
. . . . .
This is the real headline ...but OP has maliciously
"No Direct Role" is same as "Indirect Role". Army reconfirms what was already said earlier that it's taking orders from ECP. If there is anything malicious, it's in your head alone
 
.
oooooooo nice Norway vs Sweden !!

This time no grain of wheat will be sent from South Asia to feed the front in Scandinavia
 
.
@Norwegian,

Why are you changing title of the news by twisting and changing the meaning of news altogether?
If you have an intent, write a blog post yourself instead of attributing it to a newspaper which doesn't say what you want it to say.
 
.
"No Direct Role" is same as "Indirect Role". Army reconfirms what was already said earlier that it's taking orders from ECP. If there is anything malicious, it's in your head alone
No it is not..furthermore when a news article has to be shared, you cannot alter the title...You have maliciously altered the headline of the news. If you had written your own article as your opinion, it would be different but here you have post a news and changed its title @waz
 
.
oooooooo nice Norway vs Sweden !!

This time no grain of wheat will be sent from South Asia to feed the front in Scandinavia
@war&peace need basic lessons in English language. DGISPR didn't say army has no role in elections but "No Direct Role" which is same as having 'Indirect Role'
 
. .
PTI is going to win and Army has nothing to do with the election in Pakistan. It is free electoral process foreign watch dogs are also coming to witness the election so there should be no doubts.
Probably going to be a hung government. For some reason a lot of Punjab still says they are going to vote for PML-N (I'm not one of them). I'm just hoping that PML-N and PPP don't form a coalition.
 
.
No it is not..furthermore when a new article has to be shared, you cannot alter the title...
If that's the case, then I have already restored after your complaints. But spare me from your malicious accusations
 
.
This is the real headline ...but OP has maliciously changed the thread title to suit his particular agenda to defame the institutions and create a divide a between the nation and the army ...please take the strongest action against this rat

https://www.dawn.com/news/1421094/n...y-25-elections-dg-ispr-tells-senate-committee

Op has not changed the heading but Op chose to post this version of the story.

"No Direct Role" is same as "Indirect Role". Army reconfirms what was already said earlier that it's taking orders from ECP. If there is anything malicious, it's in your head alone

Yes there is every thing wrong with the title it is Dawn trying to create misinformation to only the title readers and you are choosing such news with no love loss there was a better titled article published as well on the same News. Trust me nothing like this will make a difference. there are only 15000 copies of Dawn published every day the audience is very low for them.

 
.
@war&peace need basic lessons in English language. DGISPR didn't say army has no role in elections but "No Direct Role" which is same as having 'Indirect Role'

Mujhe nahi chipkao usne wese hi mujhe ignore pe rakha hua hai. if it helps Slow Norwegian. Both you and this guy think i am an extremist wahabi terrorist.

Now go to a secluded place where you can see the northern lights and make out with a cactus
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom