INDIC
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Messages
- 18,512
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
A long long list of reasons. From all sides of the argument.
Oh man.
Can you tell few of them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A long long list of reasons. From all sides of the argument.
Oh man.
lol thats online propaganda.... there is arms embargo on them and Russia never sold Buk or Tor to them..........
Can you tell few of them.
A Rohingya insurgency will be enough to kick out tutmadu from Arakan.
Yes use more of your muslim bangladeshi brethren as cannon fodder. Mynanmar would be more happy to "put down" any such insurgency. Like they need more excuse to purge the Rohingyas.
They have already kicked out 1.2 million out of 2 million. Only 800,000 is remaining. They have a policy to purge them in phases so it does not attract too much attention. If we do not do anything, all of them will be purged over time. So we should make a decision, either we take them in or we help them fight and liberate Arakan.
You dnt have capability to go for second option
I think the Rohingya's have long sought our help for insurgency, and we never fully provided that support, although there may have been some halfhearted effort. With RAWamy League in power, I am sure India will order them not to get involved, as India does not want to jeopardize its sea-route to NE states via Sittwe port.
If China can support Kachin insurgency and Thai's can support Karen's, I think for Bangladesh to support a Rohingya insurgency would not be very difficult or improbable.
But the biggest obstacle of course will be our own leadership. Lack of clear thinking, general confusion and incompetence is an epidemic, in most parts of the world, and more so for Bangladesh.
I'm not a military fan boy so I'm not going to start a large penis competition with the smallest boy in the class but the 'Grison' has already been displayed by the army. Here is what a cursory search turned up:
AD: 24 Tunguska M1 SA-19 Gun/SAMs, 24 × SA-6, 24 Pechora-2M SAMs, 48 SA-2, 2 Bloodhound Mk.II SAMs, 400 SA-18 MANPADS, 200 CPMIEC HN5,100 × Igla-1E / SA-16 MANPADS, 200 14.5mm KPV heavy machine guns in quadruple AAA mounts, 200 37mm/40mm/57mm Anti-Aircraft Guns (various models)
Myanmar | Defence Capability Directory | Asia Pacific Defence Reporter
.
They have military rule in their country ..... just like China they can also crush any insurgency without fear of innocents life
I think the Rohingya's have long sought our help for insurgency, and we never fully provided that support, although there may have been some halfhearted effort. With RAWamy League in power, I am sure India will order them not to get involved, as India does not want to jeopardize its sea-route to NE states via Sittwe port.
If China can support Kachin insurgency and Thai's can support Karen's, I think for Bangladesh to support a Rohingya insurgency would not be very difficult or improbable.
But the biggest obstacle of course will be our own leadership. Lack of clear thinking, general confusion and incompetence is an epidemic, in most parts of the world, and more so for Bangladesh.
You are delusional. The Chinese haven't been funding insurgencies since about the time Deng Xiao Ping came into power 30 years ago. Thailand stopped helping Karen since the 80's. They now have billions invested in Myanmar. Why on earth would they suddenly start funding insurgencies?
well let us see aung san suu kyi move? Didn't she win a nobel prize? For what? she is the head of burma, right?
Oh, I'll save you the bother. Their source of funding is drugs, pure and simple. Heroin for the West and methamphetamines for Thailand. Corrupt officials on both sides of the border turn a blind eye to it. It's a big headache for the Thais.
Obtain permission from India to attack India....wait what!? LOL.......