surya kiran
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2012
- Messages
- 4,799
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Diplomatic immunity does not extend to murder.
In this case, it does. There are previous cases of diplomats involved in accidents resulting in death of a national of the country. If he was involved in discharge of his duties, he enjoys immunity. Which is what the Americans seem to be saying. If he was not involved in discharge of his duties, meaning he was enjoying his free time, the US would need to waive diplomatic immunity. Else, he would need to have waived his diplomatic immunity by submitting to a Pakistani court. Even if you want him to be convicted in the US, you would need grounds like drunk and driving. Which would in turn need a alcohol test which was not conducted.
If none of the above are present, in this present context Pakistan will not be able to do anything. Assume, you still decide to do something about it and put him under detention, it will result in a tit for tat for Pakistani diplomats in the US. They will need just an excuse to frame a case.
Therefore, I do not see much happening in this case.