What's new

NKorea vows nuclear response to US-S. Korea drills

killeragent

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jul 24, 2010
Messages
340
Reaction score
0
SEOUL: North Korea warned Saturday that it will respond with "powerful nuclear deterrence" to joint US and South Korean military exercises poised to begin this weekend, saying the drills amount to a provocation that cannot be ignored.

North Korea routinely threatens war when South Korea and the US hold joint military drills, which Pyongyang sees as a rehearsal for an attack on the North. The latest threat comes amid increased tensions on the peninsula over the deadly sinking of a South Korean warship that Seoul and Washington blame on Pyongyang.

The allies' defense chiefs announced earlier in the week they would stage the drills to send a clear message to North Korea to stop its "aggressive" behavior. Forty-six South Korean sailors were killed in the March sinking of the Cheonan, considered the worst military attack on the South since the 1950-53 Korean War.

North Korea vehemently denies any involvement and says any punishment would trigger war.

On Saturday, North Korea's powerful National Defense Commission — headed by leader Kim Jong Il — backed that threat up by promising a "retaliatory sacred war" against South Korea and the US for what it called a second "unpardonable" provocation after wrongly accusing the North in the Cheonan incident.

"The army and people of the (North) will legitimately counter with their powerful nuclear deterrence the largest-ever nuclear war exercises," the commission said in a statement carried by the country's official Korean Central News Agency.

A day earlier in Hanoi, a North Korean spokesman for the delegation attending a regional security conference warned the drills would draw a "physical response" from Pyongyang.

South Korea's Defense Ministry said no unusual North Korean military movements were detected.

The nuclear-powered USS George Washington supercarrier is already docked in the southern port of Busan for the military games set to begin Sunday. In addition, the US keeps 28,500 troops in South Korea to deter against aggression, a presence that Pyongyang cites as a key reason behind its drive to build nuclear weapons.

"The more desperately the US imperialists brandish their nukes and the more zealously their lackeys follow them, the more rapidly the (North's) nuclear deterrence will be bolstered up along the orbit of self-defense and the more remote the prospect for the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula will be become," the commission statement said.

The US-South Korean military drills are to set to run through Wednesday, with about 8,000 US and South Korean troops on some 20 ships and submarines carrying out exercises in the East Sea.

The drills also involve some 200 aircraft, headlined by four US Air Force's F-22 "Raptor" stealth fighters.

US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton announced Wednesday, after visiting the Demilitarized Zone dividing the two Koreas, that the US would slap new sanctions on the North to stifle its nuclear ambitions and punish it for the Cheonan sinking.

On Friday, the European Union said it, too, would consider new sanctions on North Korea.

The North's Foreign Ministry also said Saturday that Pyongyang will further strengthen its nuclear deterrent and again mentioned "powerful physical measures" in response to the US military provocations and sanctions.

"We are ready for both dialogue and war," KCNA quoted an unidentified Foreign Ministry spokesman as saying.

In Hanoi, Clinton and a North Korean official traded barbs Friday over the sinking, the military drills and the imposition of the new US sanctions. North Korean spokesman Ri Tong Il said the tensions showed the need to negotiate a peace treaty to replace the armistice signed at the end of the Korean War.

Clinton said the US is willing to meet and negotiate with the North, but this type of threat only heightens tensions. She added progress in the short term seems unlikely.

"It is distressing when North Korea continues its threats and causes so much anxiety among its neighbors and the larger region," she told reporters. "But we will demonstrate once again with our military exercises ... that the United States stands in firm support of the defense of South Korea and we will continue to do so.

NKorea vows nuclear response to US-S. Korea drills - Arab News
 
.
The North will definitely strike, it's a question of when and where. For a while the North will keep the Americans guessing and shiting in their pants. Of course, it will be a limited strike, like that South Korean frigate sinking.
 
.
@T-Rex
Why should the north start an strike against the south?

They have one of the biggest armies in the world but the most of their weapons are very old (1940-1960). They have no chance against the modern armies from southkorea, usa. Also kim Yong-il will know thats he then end how Saddam Hussein, in case of war. They only will start fighting to defence but they dont have the options to go in offensive.
 
.
Looks like North Koreans are the one who are sh!tting in their pants.
 
.
The North will definitely strike, it's a question of when and where. For a while the North will keep the Americans guessing and shiting in their pants. Of course, it will be a limited strike, like that South Korean frigate sinking.

You only show your immaturity making statements like that. If the U.S. was as you say "shitting their pants" we would be beating a path to appease the North. That doesn't seem to be happening though does it?

Instead of trolling maybe you could make a more constructive statement next time?
 
.
You only show your immaturity making statements like that. If the U.S. was as you say "shitting their pants" we would be beating a path to appease the North. That doesn't seem to be happening though does it?

Instead of trolling maybe you could make a more constructive statement next time?

Well, not much has happened after the South korean frigate went down with its 46 sailors. Now you couldn't call that a very brave stance on the part of uncle sam could you ? Don't hear much about the military exercise, may be there's a news blackout, could you explain why ?.
 
.
You only show your immaturity making statements like that. If the U.S. was as you say "shitting their pants" we would be beating a path to appease the North. That doesn't seem to be happening though does it?

Instead of trolling maybe you could make a more constructive statement next time?

His statement is ridiculous but bristling at that statement is equal funny
 
.
The fastest way Kim could exit from his chair is for him to strike - anywhere.

This is what the US & every one would want - an excuse / reason to get at him. It would be prudent for him only to threaten to strike coz if he were it would be strike three for him.

In any case what other deterrent would he be left with if he strikes ?
 
.
The fastest way Kim could exit from his chair is for him to strike - anywhere.

This is what the US & every one would want - an excuse / reason to get at him. It would be prudent for him only to threaten to strike coz if he were it would be strike three for him.

In any case what other deterrent would he be left with if he strikes ?

The problem is, how many millions of innocent people will die just to replace him?

Seoul is right on the border and contains half of South Korea's population, the Seoul National Capital Area has around 25 million people. A nuclear strike or even a full-on artillery strike from North Korea will lead to unacceptable losses of civilian lives.

The death tolls would be catastrophic, far more than the first Korean war in which millions died too.

The good news is that Kim Jong-Il is very old and he will die soon... so maybe this doesn't need to happen.
 
.
Ort coventional can take on south and usa at a time . But air domenance would kill north .. But war would be limited beacuse of north haveing south at gun point from seoul they hsve thousands of atilery shells which are enought yo set sout stright and they have the most submerines soo navsl strikes would be not soo close but tomohawks would do the job .
 
.
The problem is, how many millions of innocent people will die just to replace him?

Seoul is right on the border and contains half of South Korea's population, the Seoul National Capital Area has around 25 million people. A nuclear strike or even a full-on artillery strike from North Korea will lead to unacceptable losses of civilian lives.

The death tolls would be catastrophic, far more than the first Korean war in which millions died too.

The good news is that Kim Jong-Il is very old and he will die soon... so maybe this doesn't need to happen.

Yes , you are right, its only a waiting game. But there is no telling what follows next. One hears of inheritance issues among his sons.

The bottom line is that he needs to shut up & live in his delusional world.
 
.
Yes , you are right, its only a waiting game. But there is no telling what follows next. One hears of inheritance issues among his sons.

The bottom line is that he needs to shut up & live in his delusional world.

You are 100% correct. :cheers:

The bad news, is that I read in the Economist that he is probably passing the leadership to his "third son" who is (from what I hear) quite a bastard.

So I'm hoping for the best... but unfortunately the successor doesn't seem that good. Here is a wiki link to the third son:

Kim Jong-un - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.
Back
Top Bottom