Nimrata randhawa aka Nikki Hayley resigns from her position

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

In contrast democrats pamper the poor, illegals, criminals and refugees to get elected.

They want to keep the poor to remain poor by making them dependent on free dole and subsidized housing.

Someone else is taxed to pay for these free services.
That is you and me.

Liberals (both establishment and progressive dens) are actually debating issues like scaling down rising influence of corporations, healthcare, and ending wars, while republicans create issues of nothing like climate change, refugees, Muslims, blacks, Latinos, etc. to gain votes and court domestic terrorists like white supremacists.

Since you are a Hindutva supremacist, I’m sure you have much in common with these white supremacist hate mobs like KKK and tea partiers.

 

[925boy]

Sad that women are bullied out of their profession like this. Totally a disappointment.

I dont believe she was bullied out of it. She said she believes in Term limits. I think the additional stress of serving under a controversial and stressful man like Trump has worn her out too. Who can blame her.

Err No.
She is resigning to position herself as the next Republican candidate for the Presidency after Trump. She is leaving on her own terms and as many Presidential candidates have been successful and widely admired Ex-Governors like Nicki Haley the Journey to the Presidency must begin now.

She said she isnt running in 2020

 

[Sheepistanis]

You realise that was the democrat controlled op ed media at work again right?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.a9488815af05

It also appended an editor’s note, which read, “An earlier version of this article and headline created an unfair impression about who was responsible for the purchase in question. While Nikki R. Haley is the current ambassador to the United Nations, the decision on leasing the ambassador’s residence and purchasing the curtains was made during the Obama administration, according to current and former officials. The article should not have focused on Ms. Haley, nor should a picture of her been used. The article and headline have now been edited to reflect those concerns, and the picture has been removed.”

Dayum, NYT bitch slapped and exposed yet again!

I am sure you know how politics work.
Those made complicit in something, can't play the blame game. Trump administration can drop an International deal made by the previous administration in a heart beat, but can't come around to terminate unnecessary flow of expenditures? Yeah, no one is buyin it.
The unanswered question in all the hubbub: Why did the State Department, under any administration, deem it necessary to drop more than $50,000 on curtains?
NYT may not have hit the bullseye, but it did strike close enough.

 

[Crystal-Clear]

wanna be white get her azz whooped by whites .
.
.
a normal day for indians .

 

[Turingsage]

The unanswered question in all the hubbub: Why did the State Department, under any administration, deem it necessary to drop more than $50,000 on curtains?

You are supporting a concocted story. The person who wrote it had to retract it


New York Times amends report that improperly pinned pricey curtains on Nikki Haley

by Oliver Darcy @oliverdarcySeptember 14, 2018: 3:43 PM ET
controversial s

The New York Times on Friday said that a controvertial story about curtains purchased for the new residence of the ambassador to the United Nations improperly focused on Nikki Haley. The newspaper recast the story to "reflect those concerns."[/paste:font]

The initial story written by reporter Gardiner Harris carried the headline, "Nikki Haley's View of New York Is Priceless. Her Curtains? $52,701."

But the original story included a comment from a spokesperson for Haley who said plans to purchase the curtains were made during the end of the Obama administration and that Haley had no say in the purchase.

The story drew significant backlash on social media, prompting editors to review it. Following review, The Times concluded that the story had "created an unfair impression about who was responsible for the purchase in question."

An editor's note placed at the top of the revised story stated that "the decision on leasing the ambassador's residence and purchasing the curtains was made during the Obama administration, according to current and former officials."


"The article should not have focused on Ms. Haley, nor should a picture of her have been used," the editor's note concluded. "The article and headline have now been edited to reflect those concerns, and the picture has been removed."

The updated story reads much differently than the initial version. It's headline was changed to say, "State Department Spent $52,701 on Curtains for Residence of U.N. Envoy." A reference to Haley was also edited out of the article's first sentence, and the picture of her was removed from the story, among other changes.

Spokespeople for the State Department and Haley did not immediately return requests for comment.

This is the second story this particular Times reporter has written this year that later carried a lengthy editor's note. A story in May about Mark Dubowitz, the chief executive of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, had a long correction appended to it.

https://money.cnn.com/2018/09/14/media/nikki-haley-new-york-times-curtains/index.html

 

[Path-Finder]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1049800984623554560

https://twitter.com/x/status/1049772946112294916

 

[Sheepistanis]

You are supporting a concocted story. The person who wrote it had to retract it


New York Times amends report that improperly pinned pricey curtains on Nikki Haley

by Oliver Darcy @oliverdarcySeptember 14, 2018: 3:43 PM ET
controversial s

The New York Times on Friday said that a controvertial story about curtains purchased for the new residence of the ambassador to the United Nations improperly focused on Nikki Haley. The newspaper recast the story to "reflect those concerns."[/paste:font]

The initial story written by reporter Gardiner Harris carried the headline, "Nikki Haley's View of New York Is Priceless. Her Curtains? $52,701."

But the original story included a comment from a spokesperson for Haley who said plans to purchase the curtains were made during the end of the Obama administration and that Haley had no say in the purchase.

The story drew significant backlash on social media, prompting editors to review it. Following review, The Times concluded that the story had "created an unfair impression about who was responsible for the purchase in question."

An editor's note placed at the top of the revised story stated that "the decision on leasing the ambassador's residence and purchasing the curtains was made during the Obama administration, according to current and former officials."


"The article should not have focused on Ms. Haley, nor should a picture of her have been used," the editor's note concluded. "The article and headline have now been edited to reflect those concerns, and the picture has been removed."

The updated story reads much differently than the initial version. It's headline was changed to say, "State Department Spent $52,701 on Curtains for Residence of U.N. Envoy." A reference to Haley was also edited out of the article's first sentence, and the picture of her was removed from the story, among other changes.

Spokespeople for the State Department and Haley did not immediately return requests for comment.

This is the second story this particular Times reporter has written this year that later carried a lengthy editor's note. A story in May about Mark Dubowitz, the chief executive of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, had a long correction appended to it.

https://money.cnn.com/2018/09/14/media/nikki-haley-new-york-times-curtains/index.html

When there's smoke there's fire.

 

[Turingsage]

When there's smoke there's fire.

You obviously have a problem with the English language. The person who wrote the story now sheepishly admits she got it wrong. Obama administration ordered those curtains for the Government building and Niki Haley HAD NO SAY in the matter.
You are seeing smoke because you desire and want to see something that is not there, like ghosts or UFO's or Jinns

 

[YeBeWarned]

I demand " Ghar Wapsi " for Nikki , time to become Namrita Again ..

 

[Sheepistanis]

You obviously have a problem with the English language. The person who wrote the story now sheepishly admits she got it wrong. Obama administration ordered those curtains for the Government building and Niki Haley HAD NO SAY in the matter.
You are seeing smoke because you desire and want to see something that is not there, like ghosts or UFO's or Jinns

And you obviously have comprehension issues, nitpicking my post and ignoring the crux of my post will hardly suffice to boost your ego which clearly is the goal of you incoherent rambling.
So what if Obama admin ordered those curtains, they also ratified Iran nuclear deal, what came of it, don't we all know that, except of course the exclusive Nikki Haley club
Don't bother with my view, because in it, I see her being booted out . The obvious discrepancies lie with yours, perhaps its because, she is the Aatma of a wanna-be Gori you crave?

 

[Turingsage]

And you obviously have comprehension issues, nitpicking my post and ignoring the crux of my post will hardly suffice to boost your ego which clearly is the goal of you incoherent rambling.
So what if Obama admin ordered those curtains, they also ratified Iran nuclear deal, what came of it, don't we all know that, except of course the exclusive Nikki Haley club
Don't bother with my view, because in it, I see her being booted out . The obvious discrepancies lie with yours, perhaps its because, she is the Aatma of a wanna-be Gori you crave?

Read again. Nikki was not EVEN AWARE curtains had been ordered for what is a government building. If you think she spend her time scrutinizing who ordered the soap or the toilet rolls then she would be a housekeeper and not the US ambassador to the UN

 

[pakdefender]

I demand " Ghar Wapsi " for Nikki , time to become Namrita Again ..

hahaha good one

 

[Sheepistanis]

Read again. Nikki was not EVEN AWARE curtains had been ordered for what is a government building. If you think she spend her time scrutinizing who ordered the soap or the toilet rolls then she would be a housekeeper and not the US ambassador to the UN

Okay, that might be true or NOT. However, regardless her involvement, she was the beneficiary and that's what the taxpayers care about. If her toiletries cost thousands of dollars, she may as well be explaining herself to the Congress. Pakistan's present government auctioned off a recently delivered fleet of Mercedes-MayBach's. They were ordered and paid for by the previous government...... I hope you have caught my drift.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

If her toiletries cost thousands of dollars, she may as well be explaining herself to the Congress.

All that fair and lovely to look like a burnt white lady.

People like Nikki Haley and Bobby Jindal need to wake up and realize they are not white.

In the Fascists trump mindset, this is a race war and all non-whites are enemies. These people won’t get far in this administration.

 

[sammuel]

She tried to take out Pompeo. Too ambitious for a brown woman pretending to be a white Christian.

Lol Indian trying to act white then gets trashed by her white masters...

That’s the story of Indians in US.
No matter how white you may act you will never be accepted by the white man . Indian will always be the slave

No white Christian republican or not will vote for that whore since she is Indian maybe she chose the wrong party Maybe she should try the Democratic Party

It’s wierd that filthy Indian whore joined a Christian conservative and American Nationalist party like the Republican Party when in reality she is not even white

She is whore with no diginity who want to try to be white Christian Zionist more than the white American

Some assorted disgusting racists comment from this thread.

Since she is a woman - the distance from calling her a " whore ' seems acceptable to some here , those also think its important to mention her skin color or ethnic origin.

Guess what , the only one that turned out to be racist is YOU !

Nikki Haley was born in the US and can run to any office she chooses.

It is legitimate to criticize her stands or preformance if you wish. What is not legitimate is to mention her sex , color or ethnic origin which have nothing to do with the topic.