Yup and being posted as cls in an indicator! Isnt it? Sidelined!! no cls has ever been promoted further.The post cant be taken too seriously. You want a person who got sacked from "command" after a year to command the 6th largest army of the world? Doesnt make sense to me. Dont know how u people come with all this.
Dont know! Take a wild guess. Wat has number of posts got to do with anything? Dont know y u r here in the first place
quote="alibaz, post: 4932365, member: 7009"]Suddenly why some people with very few post have started supporting one officer and degrading others. Supporting or liking someone is good but degrading someone is alarming.[/quote]
Am not comparing, it's you who is comparing two general officers. Amazingly the person who is comparing two general officers considers logistics as truck supplies.
I don't say who is better cause once some one rises to this level means the officer has all the abilities to be Army Chief. Fortunately COAS is not an elected post, someone has right to select and surely he will exercise his right. For me there is no issue if it is Haroon, Rashid, Raheel or Tariq but if seniority is given precedence that would be better.
I hope you know who is General Tariq Khan and which family he belongs to. Nawaz Sharif had bad experience cause he selected the third person who had no politically strong family by superseding two senior generals who belonged to politically strong families. Surely General Musharraf was not son of Nawab of Tank.
Dont know! Take a wild guess. Wat has number of posts got to do with anything? Dont know y u r here in the first place
quote="alibaz, post: 4932365, member: 7009"]Suddenly why some people with very few post have started supporting one officer and degrading others. Supporting or liking someone is good but degrading someone is alarming.[/quote]