S.Y.A
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2008
- Messages
- 4,058
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
a very good decision, more provinces should be made too, 3 new provinces in place of Punjab, 3 in Sindh, 4 in Balochistan, 2-3 in Northern areas, it would be perfect. When the people of these areas will have the control of their areas in their own hands only then could these areas develop as the locals of an area know what the problems in their society are much better than an outsider, e.g. a makrani knows problems of his areas much better than the person in Dera Bugti, or a person in Cholistan knows more than a man from Karachi
you are a total idiot, I want to ask you can a punjabi understand sindhi, balochi, pashto etc. etc. and vice versa, and can a punjabi, sindhi, balochi, pathan understand Urdu? a national language is the one that can be understood easily by everyone so your argument is quite stupid
and you must know that in US too there were many different linguistic groups present but English was chosen as the official language, and you know what nearly everyone can understand english
You got me wrong. I'm in favour of keeping local languages the way it is. What i'm against is Urdu being the national language, it is a language that is unfair. My point is to create a language that is 'fair' and that would be a mixture to reflect all of Pakistan;s provinces.
you are a total idiot, I want to ask you can a punjabi understand sindhi, balochi, pashto etc. etc. and vice versa, and can a punjabi, sindhi, balochi, pathan understand Urdu? a national language is the one that can be understood easily by everyone so your argument is quite stupid
and you must know that in US too there were many different linguistic groups present but English was chosen as the official language, and you know what nearly everyone can understand english