I'd tell you that you're speaking nonsense for several reasons:
1.You seem to think that Africa was a place where everybody got along but that's wrong.Africans were killing each other long before the arrival of the Europeans.The Zulus ,for example,almost wiped out the natives when they migrated in the hinterlands of S. Africa.
Wrong sir. Inter-kingdom wars did not warrant for racial/religious superiority in Africa which came only later.
This same establishment spread the myth of how indigenous peoples in Rwanda exterminated each other. The reality is that before colonial powers and Christianity stepped in, in this case, the Hutus and Tutsis lived with each other for centuries.
Inter-regional conflicts apart, there was no sense of racial superiority but mere territorial desires.
Racial/religious exterminations started with the development of Race Science by European powers who manipulated faultlines and turned people towards each other.
2.Africans were selling other Africans as slaves to Europeans.
3.It was the Europeans themselves who stoped slavery and they had to use force against muslim rulers who objected to the abolition of slavery. [/QUOTE]
Partly right.
Arab Muslim rulers started slavery of black Africans but that was not stopped by you. That is what supplied plantation workers for colonial powers.
Please get your history right from non-European sources of the countries that have undergone this menace.
4.More native Algerians actually fought alongside the French against Algerian rebels.
Colonial armies employed local subjects across the world, even in our country.
But does that justify occupying other countries?
Is there any statistics to prove that majority Algerians were pro-colonial and minority were not?
You will get your answer in the Algerian war of liberation and also in Vietnam's war of independence.
