What's new

New picture of May 2 events emerged

Bratva

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
13,832
Reaction score
67
Country
Pakistan
Location
Qatar
A log that reveals too much but not confirmed


Ansar Abbasi
Friday, March 02, 2012

ISLAMABAD: On May 8, 2011, six days after the May 2 US Abbottabad operation which got Osama bin Laden, I received an email message from a source never known to me before, but it contained a lot of sensitive data, part of which appears to be similar to what the main memogate witness Mansoor Ijaz has revealed on Thursday before the memo commission in London.

The subject of the email was “CODE-663” and the source claimed to be from an intelligence agency. The revelations in the message were startling like that one official on very senior position was making hectic efforts in the middle of the night of May 2 to ask the other person who also occupies very senior position if he had permitted Washington to launch the Abbottabad operation.

It is totally unclear whether Mansoor Ijaz has obtained his information and data from the same source and whether he confirmed or authenticated the data from any credible Pakistani authority before putting such sensitive issues before the memo commission.

The same e-mail gave a detailed account of the monitoring logs of the Air Traffic Control, which had timely captured the intrusion of US choppers and had informed all concerned about it immediately including even scrambling Pakistani F-16 aircraft to shoot down the choppers and force them to land inside Pakistan. Since the information was never confirmed to us when we cross checked it then, therefore, it was decided not to use it then and no story was published based on this information.

However, now after Mansoor Ijaz’s disclosures, some of which match what is contained in the Code 663 Email, it gets some credence but still remains unconfirmed by any competent Pakistani authority.

However, since the data is now partly in the memo commission, the responsible Pakistani authorities ought to take a clear position on whether the information contained is accurate or not and this could have serious and monumental repercussions.

For the interest of the readers, the email is reproduced here but some of its portions including names of the senior most persons mentioned in it are deleted because of no authentic confirmation. This is also not clear how many other people received this email from the same source and when.

The e-mail reads: “

CODE-663

Background

Clashes between CIA and ISI began after the denial of NWA operation by Pakistan and its refusal to sharing information till the time it’s not two way. It said Pakistan will not share information if the relationship remains one way.

After the Rymond D case ISI asked CIA to disclose the location of her agents/employees in Pakistan and tell us what was the nature of their emplacement in Pakistan? After repeated questioning CIA kept denying that they have so many operatives in Pakistan.

In the recent past when the clashes b/w ISI and CIA got worsened Pakistan took the stand that ISI will not support any CIA activity in Afghanistan or Pakistan if they do not declare their operatives in Pakistan. To this effect CIA officials denied in plain words that no such clarification will be made to ISI. However after lot of discussion CIA agreed to declare 1079 officials which were operating in Pakistan under various capacities. For remaining they denied to give any clue.

ISI had a list of 438 US officials which were in Pakistan but were not present in any consulate or embassy staff of any city. Their whereabouts were asked from CIA, to which they gave a funny reply that many of them have been lost.....? what lost......? Where...? How....? CIA claimed that these operatives were used in FATA area for the war on terror but in various incidents they have either been kidnapped or killed by Taliban so now they were no more in Pakistan. This stupid reply was totally non-digestible by ISI.

ISI clearly stated that if CIA will not cooperate with ISI on the table of trust basing upon justice and equality than ISI was also not bound to keep the ties as they were. This strict reply and warning was not expected by CIA. Exchange of harsh words occurred b/w ISI and CIA. At the end ISI gave 3 levels of warnings to CIA and deadline of 2 May 2011 was given to them after which ISI will not be bound to act as partner to Tri-Star Intelligence Sharing Pact.

As execution of its 1st level warning given to CIA and few secret pieces of information were shared with China, UK and Germany against CIA. Similarly involvement of CIA behind Egypt, Behrain and KSA was point of concern for their respective govts.

The frustrated US establishment contacted one of the very senior persons who as usual could not sustain the pressure and asked the other very senior person about it. However it was declared a routine matter between intelligence agencies.

Sequence of events on night of May 02:

The sequence of events on the D-night were as following: The below mentioned summary of conversations and timings are recorded at Air Traffic Controls (ATCs) of various cities and can be confirmed from the radar and ATC officers and operators.

Time

Activity

0039

2 x US choppers crossed the international border and entered Pakistan

0047

2 x more US choppers crossed international border and entered Pakistan

0040

Pilot exchanged his call sign with ATC

0041

ATC: give destination?

0041

Chopper: heading Chaklala AB

0043

ATC Exchanged call sign with all 4 choppers and came to know that one of them was remote vehicle and not being flown by any human.

0044

ATC swat, PMA, FF center, Frontier House and Chaklala heard this conversation b/w the pilot and chaklala ATC.

0045

ATC checked and got confirmation from base HQ that 3 of them were regular aircraft of US Embassy in Islamabad and these were the routine flights however time was not as per routine.

0058

The leading formation pilot changed his course and diverted towards Abbottabad

0058

ATC: Why the flight path has been changed to north east?

0058

Pilot: we are facing dense clouds and mountain peaks so we will divert from Abbotabbad

0059

ATC: okay the path as it’s a routine procedure for heli pilots that they can divert for clouds and peaks specially at night.

0105

3 x choppers started hovering over Abbotabbad

0105

ATC: Why you have stopped?

0106

Pilot: we are facing some technical difficulty and we will rectify it before coming to Chaklala

0107

ATC got suspicious and gave alert to AOC (Air Operations Center PAF HQ)

0107

SOTF (SSG Special Operations Task Force) got alert and informed GHQ. Within minutes at least four persons holding very senior positions in the country were in picture of the situation being developed in Abbotabbad.

0107

ATC PMA told the pilot to divert to PMA so that the fault could be rectified

0107

Pilot: gave no answer

0108

Pilot: we are being fired

0109

Pilot: one of our heli is down and we need to land

0109

SOTF (Special Operations Task Force) present near PMA were alert and reached the site where the chopper was preparing to land.

0110

After this all ATCs kept contacting choppers but none of them replied

0110

SOTF officials saw that one of the choppers fired on remotely flown aerial vehicle and hit that with its own fire. SOTF force tried to enter the compound where the US chopper was hovering on and the CIA operatives were sling down. The cordon was being maintained by the CIA and they didn’t allowed SOTF to enter. A major from SOTF was warned not to interfere as the operation was being conducted after the approval of one of the very senior persons. The major got hold of 2 CIA agents and forcefully entered the compound where he saw the operatives who were coming down from heli. Meanwhile PMA contacted one of the senior persons and asked if it was being done with his permission. He negated and said that he was already on it so wait for further orders. Meanwhile Pentagon was contacted by a very senior person and asked what is going on? Pentagon replied that there is an operation being conducted and its permission has been given by another senior person.

0113

One senior person contacts other five senior persons on hotline.

0119

One senior person was told to intercept the US Choppers.

0118

PAF Bases at Peshawar and Sargodha were sent red alerts on two minutes notice.

0121

Four F-16s took off from both bases.

0125

One senior person contacts the office of another senior person to say that he has permitted the operation, thus no intervention should be made.

0130

Another senior person, however, gave orders to force the choppers to land within Pakistan, failing which they may be shot down.

0136

F-16s got the choppers at zero line (border between Pakistan and Afghanistan).

0137

US Formation Commander was asked to divert the route and land in Pakistan to which he denied and repeated that permission was given by one senior person of Pakistan and he’d not therefore make a landing.

0139

Choppers crossed Pak territory and entered into Afghanistan. Pak F-16s however kept chasing them.

0140

US Formation Commander apparently contacted Pentagon to ask them to get Pak F-16s removed.

0140

Office of one senior person again received a call from the office of another senior person that no adventure should be undertaken as the operation was done with his approval. A senior person gives the message that “there are few things that I would personally brief you in the morning and nothing should be done now. F-16s should be called back”.

0144

Message was conveyed to Pak pilots to return.

0430

A log that reveals too much but not confirmed
 
.
When will the day come and we close all ties with the US for good.
 
.
even if i believe this still we failed our air force failed dear .as soon as we admit it its good for our future . they cheat us but still they are open to fly over pakistan its another slap and failure of us .
 
.
i was feel proud if we shot them down they did their job and we just senior person to senior person bashing and begging nothing more :tdown: :tdown: :tdown: our f-16s got them chase them and then come back empty hands :tdown:
 
.
Now just tell me the name of senior authority who gave permission for this operation :butcher:
 
. . .
Now just tell me the name of senior authority who gave permission for this operation :butcher:

They are all busy planning their after retirement period with the heavy load of cash in their accounts, and they will get US citizenship (like the courier guy) and get "US immunity".
 
.
They are all busy planning their after retirement period with the heavy load of cash in their accounts, and they will get US citizenship (like the courier guy) and get "US immunity".
these people are traitors of this nation and as long as we dont punish them and make them example for others we will face same humiliation every 2nd day because of these idiots
 
.
i was feel proud if we shot them down they did their job and we just senior person to senior person bashing and begging nothing more :tdown: :tdown: :tdown: our f-16s got them chase them and then come back empty hands :tdown:

Our best aircrafts did not fire single shot or missile, what great airforce.
 
.
Our best aircrafts did not fire single shot or missile, what great airforce.

thats why we need rulers and heads of forces which are not worship USA . an air chief job is to shot down hostile aircrafts not to begg and call again and again senior person +senior person +senior person . its show we have no command and control no order of battle nothing .just imagine if Turkish Korean chines air chief was here what he order? shot first then we have talk .in our case we talk and talk and then talk thats it.its show our hands shake even to shot a single shot on USA .really we are changed totally
 
. .
Will the Pakistan Army and Airforce do some action somewhere else to win back the respect from the people?
how can you ask such question ? :hitwall:
what we did when they killed our 24 soldiers ?

---------- Post added at 01:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:43 PM ----------

Our best aircrafts did not fire single shot or missile, what great airforce.
missiles cant be fired automatically , you need guts to fire them and our leadership lack that
 
.
Will the Pakistan Army and Airforce do some action somewhere else to win back the respect from the people?

---------- Post added at 12:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:42 PM ----------



The moles within

after that 2 may day how many times again they violate our airspace and land borders? i think uncountable time what we did? nothing they was bombing our troops and we was talking to senior person again on hot line but never give order to fight back . its mean we need senior persons more then forces these days :D
 
.
missiles cant be fired automatically , you need guts to fire them and our leadership lack that

Like i said in other thread:

bad leadership + many resources = failed state (Pakistan)
good leader ship + less or no resources = developed country (many countries are their as an example)

same thing goes for the army and airforce.

After all this even African countries won't be afraid of Pakistani Army and Airforce as they know the leaders are available for rent on easy terms and conditions

---------- Post added at 12:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:50 PM ----------

after that 2 may day how many times again they violate our airspace and land borders? i think uncountable time what we did? nothing they was bombing our troops and we was talking to senior person again on hot line but never give order to fight back . its mean we need senior persons more then forces these days :D

And more hotlines. A leased line will serve the purpose for the repeated talking that our leaders do.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom