What's new

New Philippine navy chief 'defends' Beijing's S China Sea activities

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
New Philippine navy chief 'defends' Beijing's S China Sea activities

  • 2015-08-12

  • taccad-162128_copy1.jpg
Rear Admiral Caesar Taccad is sworn in as the new chief of the Philippine Navy, Aug. 10, 2015. (Internet photo)


The Philippines' new navy chief may have inadvertently defended China's activities in the South China Sea by declaring that Beijing is merely guarding its own interests and that "no expansion is happening" in the region.

According to the Philippine Star, Rear Admiral Caesar Taccad made the remarks as he took over his new post at a ceremony on Monday.

"It's much heated before. I think we are in a better position now," Taccad said in response to questions about Beijing's aggressive moves in the South China Sea to assert sovereignty over the disputed Spratly islands. "We are communicating with China and more or less not as threatened as before. You know what they are trying to do and we try to maintain more or less peaceful co-existence or settlement of what issue we have."

"They have been there for a long time and they are guarding what they think is their interest in the South China Sea. No expansion is happening. They are just pursuing their interest," he added.

The comments may have been viewed as a slap in the face to President Benigno Aquino III, who was also present at the ceremony. Aquino has long been one of the most vocal critics of China's land reclamation activities and military construction in the Spratlys, having earlier this year compared China to Nazi Germany.

Taccad's statements also run contrary to congressman Ashley Acedillo's recent claims that a Chinese coast guard ship is now permanently anchored near Second Thomas Shoal, where a Philippine logistics ship, the BRP Sierra Madre, has been grounded since 1999 and serves as an outpost for a Philippine detachment. China has long maintained that the Philippines deliberately ran the ship aground to strengthen its presence and claims over the shoal. "This is now a big problem, because once BRP Sierra Madre disintegrates and we leave the area, the Chinese can immediately take over," Acedillo said.

A senior naval officer was also reported by the Philippine Star as saying that China's naval blockade is continually trying to block the Western Command of the Philippine Armed Forces from conducting troop rotations and re-provisioning operations at the shoal.

Meanwhile, China's foreign ministry has fired back at Beijing's critics, especially the Philippines and Japan, after China was singled out for its conduct in the South China Sea during the East Asia Summit foreign minister meeting in Kuala Lumpur last week.

On Aug. 6, Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi defended "groundless accusations from the Philippines and Japan," noting that "the situation in the South China Sea is stable on the whole, and there is no possibility of major conflicts."

"Up to now, there has not been a single case in which freedom of navigation in the South China Sea is impeded," Wang said before adding, "China stands ready to work with other parties to continue to ensure freedom of navigation and overflight in the South China Sea."

Wang then complained about the Philippines' grounding of the Sierra Madre and Manila's use of dubious excuses as to why it cannot tow the ship away, and blasted Japan for building its own artificial island at Okinotori, which Japan calls an "island" but China claims is a "reef."

Recent live-fire drills and naval training exercises being conducted by the People's Liberation Army Navy in several areas of the South China Sea from Aug. 11 to 14 is also being construed as a response to the criticisms from the Philippines and Japan.

According to the US-based outlet Business Insider, China could potentially continue to expand its presence in the South China Sea by installing newly developed Very Large Floating Structures (VLSFs). China's Jidong Development Group unveiled its first VLSF in late July at the National Defense Science and Technology Achievement exhibition in Beijing, showing off a structure comprised of numerous smaller floating modules that can be assembled together at sea to create larger floating platforms.

The report notes that VLSFs have multiple purposes, though the Chinese design appears to be geared towards a floating military base. If properly constructed, such a VLSF would hypothetically be able to carry aircraft and supplies like a much less mobile aircraft carrier, the report added.
 
.
The OP article is from Want China Time:

New Philippine navy chief 'defends' Beijing's S China Sea activities|WCT

I thought some Chinese members here would often say Wantchinatime is a joke and should not be posted on this forum.

----------------------------------------

This is a previous post from a Chinese name @xunzi and got a thumbs up from the OP:

LOL WantChinaTime again. There should be a rule that whoever use WantChinaTime as source deserve an immediate ban.

Now to my American friends and all cheerleader.....

China's aircraft carriers would be a liability in a conflict with the US: Kanwa | Page 2
 
Last edited:
.
.
New Philippine navy chief 'defends' Beijing's S China Sea activities

  • 2015-08-12

  • taccad-162128_copy1.jpg
Rear Admiral Caesar Taccad is sworn in as the new chief of the Philippine Navy, Aug. 10, 2015. (Internet photo)



"It's much heated before. I think we are in a better position now," Taccad said in response to questions about Beijing's aggressive moves in the South China Sea to assert sovereignty over the disputed Spratly islands. "We are communicating with China and more or less not as threatened as before. You know what they are trying to do and we try to maintain more or less peaceful co-existence or settlement of what issue we have."

"They have been there for a long time and they are guarding what they think is their interest in the South China Sea. No expansion is happening. They are just pursuing their interest," he added.

Where is the line in which he is defending the Chinese claims of SCS??
 
.
The OP article is from Want China Time:

New Philippine navy chief 'defends' Beijing's S China Sea activities|WCT

I thought some Chinese members here would often say Wantchinatime is a joke and should not be posted on this forum.

----------------------------------------

This is a previous post from a Chinese name @xunzi and got a thumbs up from the OP:



China's aircraft carriers would be a liability in a conflict with the US: Kanwa | Page 2


Then try this: New Navy chief vows to defend West Philippine Sea | Headlines, News, The Philippine Star | philstar.com

Same quote for the want times.

"Taccad added he does not see any expansion from China.

“They have been there for a long time and they are guarding what they think is their interest in the South China Sea. No expansion is happening. They are just pursuing their interest.”"
 
.
Nice catch! :tup:

The reason he posted the wantchinatime article rather than the original Phil Star source is because Wantchinatime added the phrase “Philippine Navy Chief defends beijing’s...” where the original quoted article from the Phil Star did not. To the contrary, the original mentioned this:

“Newly installed Philippine Navy chief Rear Admiral Caesar Taccad vowed yesterday to defend the country’s maritime domain from China’s aggressive moves in the West Philippine Sea.”

He got busted and now trying to make an excuse. lol

Indians are best when ignored. :-)

I saw the original content as mentioned in the WCT article but just wanted to attract some Indians and Indian false flaggers, and decided to keep the WCT article without a hyperlink.

Putting Indians at work is fun.

@Carlosa, see this guy still thinks I’m Indian when I’ve told him many times I’m Vietnamese. So maybe Viets are not so easy to figure out don’t you see? lol

Then try this: New Navy chief vows to defend West Philippine Sea | Headlines, News, The Philippine Star | philstar.com

Same quote for the want times.

"Taccad added he does not see any expansion from China.

“They have been there for a long time and they are guarding what they think is their interest in the South China Sea. No expansion is happening. They are just pursuing their interest.”"

I didn’t even dispute anything about the content in my previous post. My point was, many Chinese members here often dismiss unfavorable articles about them just by attacking the reputation of the publisher without even discussing the contents of the article. See the quote from that xunzi guy? He doesnt even bothered arguing against the contents of the article but just attacke the publisher WantChinaTime. Even asking for a rule to ban those who use WantChinatime. This ad hominen attack is a well known tactic and now I’m just showing their double standard. @jhungary also recently hightlighted this double standard in other Chinese members.

The funny thing is that the OP actually clicked the thumbs up button for that xunzi quote. lol
 
.
"They have been there for a long time and they are guarding what they think is their interest in the South China Sea. No expansion is happening. They are just pursuing their interest,"

-------Rear Admiral Caesar Taccad,chief of the Philippine Navy
 
.
The reason he posted the wantchinatime article rather than the original Phil Star source is because Wantchinatime added the phrase “Philippine Navy Chief defends beijing’s...” where the original quoted article from the Phil Star did not. To the contrary, the original mentioned this:

“Newly installed Philippine Navy chief Rear Admiral Caesar Taccad vowed yesterday to defend the country’s maritime domain from China’s aggressive moves in the West Philippine Sea.”

He got busted and now trying to make an excuse. lol



@Carlosa, see this guy still thinks I’m Indian when I’ve told him many times I’m Vietnamese. So maybe Viets are not so easy to figure out don’t you see? lol



I didn’t even dispute anything about the content in my previous post. My point was, many Chinese members here often dismiss unfavorable articles about them just by attacking the reputation of the publisher without even discussing the contents of the article. See the quote from that xunzi guy? He doesnt even bothered arguing against the contents of the article but just attacke the publisher WantChinaTime. Even asking for a rule to ban those who use WantChinatime. This ad hominen attack is a well known tactic and now I’m just showing their double standard. @jhungary also recently hightlighted this double standard in other Chinese members.

The funny thing is that the OP actually clicked the thumbs up button for that xunzi quote. lol

You are so smart? Why didn't you ignore this sentence?

He described the prevailing security situation in the disputed archipelago as much better compared with the past.

“It’s much heated before. I think we are in a better position now. We are communicating with China, and more or less not as threatened as before. You know what they are trying to do and we try to maintain more or less peaceful co-existence or settlement of what issue we have,” he said.

Taccad added he does not see any expansion from China.

How does the aggression from China came about?
 
. . .
Wow chinese propaganda alert
Your leader realise clinging on to things not belong to them and hamper economic development with China is a bad move. It will do appeasing more for China in future since the American offer zero support in economic help.

Chinese FM rejects Philippine, Japanese, U.S. claims on South China Sea issue - Xinhua | English.news.cn

He said the Philippines alleges that Huangyan Island and other related islands and reefs in the South China Sea belong to the Philippines; however, the Treaty of Paris (1898), the Treaty of Washington (1900) and the Convention between the United States and Great Britain (1930) state clearly that the west limit of the Philippine territory is 118 degrees east longitude, while Huangyan Island and Nansha Islands are obviously not Philippine territories as they are located completely west to the 118 degrees east longitude.

After independence, the Philippines' domestic laws and relevant treaties have all reaffirmed the legal effects of the above- mentioned three treaties and once again expressively defined that the west limit of the Philippine territory is 118 degrees east longitude, Wang said.
 
. .
Your general knows better than you. You should listen to him.
Zero_wing and all other pinoy troll will hide themselves if we challenged them to bring out their philippine consitiuition declaring the real sovereignity of Philippine for independence from American. Scarborough shoal and all others are not part of Philippine territories. They are misled and cheated by Aquino and the Americans. :lol:

9 dash line is long declared by ROC in 1946 and the claim inherited by PRC. Mainland China claim is legal.
 
.
Zero_wing and all other pinoy troll will hide themselves if we challenged them to bring out their philippine consitiuition declaring the real sovereignity of Philippine for independence from American. Scarborough shoal and all others are not part of Philippine territories. They are misled and cheated by Aquino and the Americans. :lol:

9 dash line is long declared by ROC in 1946 and the claim inherited by PRC. Mainland China claim is legal.

Again it is we maps to point out while you guys don't have one just recent fabrications

Your general knows better than you. You should listen to him.

Wow maybe to us drugs maybe so tell me! Evidence where is it? has investigation have been made? again racist attitude and stereotyping is all am reading from the arrogant 50cent troll troopers
 
.
Zero_wing and all other pinoy troll will hide themselves if we challenged them to bring out their philippine consitiuition declaring the real sovereignity of Philippine for independence from American. Scarborough shoal and all others are not part of Philippine territories. They are misled and cheated by Aquino and the Americans. :lol:

9 dash line is long declared by ROC in 1946 and the claim inherited by PRC. Mainland China claim is legal.

And what about Mainland China, does your government enforce your own constitution, or is it simply a rubber-stamp paper with a CCP logo on it? :flame:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom