What's new

New Islamist alliance opposes Jamaat hartal

Can we send Jamat, BAL, BNP, Olama Mashaekh, ICT, Projonmo brigade to Nijhum Dip? That's still jungle life, bunch of outlaws can play on the ground, fight, die....whatever they wish. To get civilized, urbanized every jungle needs outlaws you know the wild west era :D .. they can contribute in developing Nijhum Dip. We don't need these here, now everyone is sort of tense....ar vallage na.

you have my vote :D
 
.
If you are not a Muslim yourself, then it is not good manners for you to tell them what to do. So are you a Muslim?

Why every time ppl have to explain u guys that they r muslim or not. Yes Im a muslim and I hate jamat.
Islam is not jamat. Mainstream islamic ppl hate jamat. After a massacre in BD how can they do plitics.
Mainstream muslim ppl r ashamed of their works. If the ICT fails they should be come under shariah law.

Now tell whats ur religion?
I dont differ ppl by religion.If u r citizen of BD and work for sake of country u r welcome.
 
.
Why every time ppl have to explain u guys that they r muslim or not. Yes Im a muslim and I hate jamat.
Islam is not jamat. Mainstream islamic ppl hate jamat. After a massacre in BD how can they do plitics.
Mainstream muslim ppl r ashamed of their works. If the ICT fails they should be come under shariah law.

Now tell whats ur religion?
I dont differ ppl by religion.If u r citizen of BD and work for sake of country u r welcome.

Thanks for clearing it up. I never hide the fact that I am a proud Muslim and I have no problem with Hindu Bangladeshi's. My only problem is with those people that are compromising national interest, regardless of religion.

I know the problems with Jamat, but don't you understand that this political theater is being used by AL to gain support and get votes for next election? Do you want AL to come back to power?
 
.
Thanks for clearing it up. I never hide the fact that I am a proud Muslim and I have no problem with Hindu Bangladeshi's. My only problem is with those people that are compromising national interest, regardless of religion.

I know the problems with Jamat, but don't you understand that this political theater is being used by AL to gain support and get votes for next election? Do you want AL to come back to power?

I dont madly support AL. My support changes.
Ppl voted AL with a hope of judgement to war criminals.
It was clearly stated on their manifesto.
So they came to power with a huge support.
Now they started to begin the judgement but jamat the party we hate most started al these violences against these. Whom we know as opposite power of BD independence.
Their violence again against us. Now tell where the ppl's sentiment will go.
I told before jamat shouldnt have back those war criminals.
Yes AL is benefitted by this protest.But fault goes to jamat. Bnp shouldnt support jamat anymore.
 
.
jamaat does not need the supporter of the alliance for thursday. The alliance is to neutralize shahbag.
 
.
Another of Indo Awami PET party for "Jamaat-hate" alliance. Problem for Indians and Awami League is issue their attack and hate against ISLAM is the issue, NOT Jamaat. This proves the point that Shahbagh does not have any acceptability among over 90% Muslim majority population. That is why indians and Awami League desperate to create pet party to sing their tune. Just like Shamim Afzal one of the prominent Islam hater termed as Islamic thinker.
 
.
Religious Instigation
Jamaat indeed involved

2013-02-28__ft03.jpg

The image from TV footage shows Jamaat Assistant Secretary General Mujibur Rahman, in dark Punjabi, coming out of Baitul Mukarram Mosque with protesters immediately after the Juma prayers last Friday. Jamaat denied he was there. Image: Independent TV


Leaders of eight Islamic parties and law enforcers have strongly claimed that Jamaat-Shibir men were there during Friday's countrywide demonstration demanding punishment to "atheist" bloggers of Shahbagh protest.

Talking to The Daily Star yesterday they said Jamaat-Shibir activists blending in with leaders and activists of the eight Islamist parties, which had organised Friday's demonstration, carried out attacks on law enforcers and journalists, especially that took place in front of the capital's Baitul Mokarram mosque.

On Friday, the agitators burned the national flag and vandalised Shaheed minars at several places in the country to counter the mass movement demanding capital punishment to the war criminals of 1971.

This drew huge flak for Jamaat and Shibir, which had extended open support to the Islamist parties' agitation against the Shahbagh movement.

Most of the mainstream electronic and print media blamed Jamaat-Shibir for attacking law enforcers and acting in disguise under the banner of the eight Islamist parties.

Jamaat, a key component of the BNP-led 18-party alliance, refuted the allegation.

Since September last year, Jamaat-Shibir men have been applying new strategies, including hit-and-run tactics on law enforcers, and vandalising and torching public vehicles, demanding the International Crimes Tribunal to be made void and release of its leaders facing war crimes charges at the tribunals.

Although Jamaat has been saying that they were not with the recent movement of eight Islamist parties', a number of leaders of the Islamist parties yesterday claimed that Jamaat-Shibir men had intruded into their Friday's protest across the country and were involved in provocative activities.

Footage of a private television channel on Friday's protest at the national mosque shows a Jamaat assistant secretary general coming out of the mosque with protestors immediately after the Juma prayers.

Well informed sources identified him as Jamaat Assistant Secretary General Mujibur Rahman, who had been arrested in January and was out on bail. Law enforcers arrested him again on Friday.

A staff of Jamaat central office, however, denied the fact.

International Affairs Secretary of Bangladesh Khelafat Andolon Abu Kasim Kasimi told The Daily Star, "What can we do if Jamaat-Shibir men intrude in our movement and carry out subversive activities to realise their demand?"

Newly-elected Chairman of Islami Oikya Jote Abdul Latif Nejami also echoed Kasimi and added that a large number of people took part in the protest in front of Baitul Mokarram and Jamaat-Shibir men were likely to blend in with them.

Ahmadullah Ashraf, ameer of Bangladesh Khelafat Andolon which is leading the eight Islamic parties, on Tuesday told this correspondent that Jamaat men might have been involved in Friday's mayhem across the country including torching the national flag and vandalising Shaheed Minars.

Apart from the three leaders, some other leaders of the eight Islamist parties wishing anonymity also spoke of Jamaat-Shibir the same way.

On Friday, Deputy Commissioner (Motijheel zone) Nazmul Alam of Dhaka Metropolitan Police told reporters that Jamaat-Shibir activists posing as general devotees had attacked police and committed other destructive activities around the national mosque.

Yesterday, he said that in primary investigation they had got the evidence that Jamaat-Shibir men had been there during Friday's violence in the capital.

“We have arrested more than 172 people in connection with Friday's anarchy in the city and according to our primary findings, some of the arrestees are linked with Jamaat-Shibir,” he added.

Jamaat indeed involved
 
.
Why every time ppl have to explain u guys that they r muslim or not. Yes Im a muslim and I hate jamat.
Islam is not jamat. Mainstream islamic ppl hate jamat. After a massacre in BD how can they do plitics.
Mainstream muslim ppl r ashamed of their works. If the ICT fails they should be come under shariah law.

Now tell whats ur religion?
I dont differ ppl by religion.If u r citizen of BD and work for sake of country u r welcome.

The evidence you need for Shariah law is certainly more stricter than ICT. Try to check it out.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom