NirmalKrish
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2011
- Messages
- 1,686
- Reaction score
- -30
- Country
- Location
IRAN is developing a missile capable of hitting the east coast of the US, according to an Israeli government minister, intensifying Western anxiety over the Tehran regime's nuclear ambitions.
The fresh alert was further heightened by reports that US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta believes a pre-emptive strike on Iran's nuclear facilities by Israel is likely, and could come as soon as April.
The increasingly murky issue is a prime focus of US foreign policy deliberations, with Barack Obama insisting in last month's State of the Union address he would ''take no options off the table'' in preventing Iran from developing a nuclear arsenal.
Advertisement: Story continues below But contrary to assertions that the chief threat was to Iran's near-neighbour, Israel's Minister for Strategic Affairs, Moshe Yaalon, said the missile project was ''aimed at America, not us''.
Mr Yaalon made the claim at a public policy conference in Herzliya, north of Tel Aviv, saying the missile being built at an Iranian research facility that was damaged in a mysterious explosion in November was a prototype with a range of 9600 kilometres - enough to reach the US.
Mr Yaalon said that only the threat of a punishing military strike would compel the Iranian regime to abandon its nuclear ambitions.
''The West has the ability to strike, but as long as Iran isn't convinced that there's a determination to follow through with it, they will continue with their manipulations,'' he said.
At the same conference, Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak said military action needed to be considered if economic sanctions failed to deter Iran, and the window for action was closing fast.
But he said there was now widespread global understanding that an attack may be necessary.
Several of the Republicans now vying for their party's 2012 presidential nomination have attacked the Obama administration for not threatening more clearly a strike against Iran should it continue to defy international demands for greater transparency of its nuclear program. They have accused the President of leaving the tough talk mostly to Israel.
Mr Panetta's view that Israel would go it alone, possibly in April or May, was first reported by The Washington Post, which said the Defence Secretary was increasingly alarmed at the prospect of a unilateral strike. CNN later said it had confirmed the story via a source within the administration.
In Brussels for a meeting of NATO defence ministers, Mr Panetta declined to discuss in detail the reports, but said: ''Israel has indicated that they're considering this [in public statements], and we have indicated our concerns.''
Analysts believe only US bunker-busting bombs could penetrate deep enough underground to take out Iran's nuclear facilities, explaining Israel's urgency in seeking to co-opt US support for a strike.
Mr Barak said that should the facilities be too deeply embedded, they would no longer be susceptible to Israeli air strikes alone. Washington and the European Union have imposed increasingly tough sanctions on Iran recently, prompting the regime of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to warn it would close the Strait of Hormuz shipping lane if it was prevented from exporting its crude oil, a move the US has said it would not tolerate.
The EU agreed last month to ban Iranian oil imports as of July 1 and freeze assets of its central bank and eight other entities. The US has also imposed restrictions on financial transactions with Iran.
Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency completed talks this week aimed at resolving Western suspicions about its nuclear program, which Iran insists is for peaceful purposes only. They are due to meet again on February 21.
Meanwhile, former US defence secretary Bob Gates warned about the dangers of a new war in the region, telling CNN that ''if Iraq and Afghanistan have taught us anything in recent history, it is the unpredictability of war and that these things are easier to get into than to get out of''.
He added: ''This is, I think, one of the toughest foreign policy problems I have ever seen since entering the government 45 years ago.''
New Iranian missile 'could strike US'
The fresh alert was further heightened by reports that US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta believes a pre-emptive strike on Iran's nuclear facilities by Israel is likely, and could come as soon as April.
The increasingly murky issue is a prime focus of US foreign policy deliberations, with Barack Obama insisting in last month's State of the Union address he would ''take no options off the table'' in preventing Iran from developing a nuclear arsenal.
Advertisement: Story continues below But contrary to assertions that the chief threat was to Iran's near-neighbour, Israel's Minister for Strategic Affairs, Moshe Yaalon, said the missile project was ''aimed at America, not us''.
Mr Yaalon made the claim at a public policy conference in Herzliya, north of Tel Aviv, saying the missile being built at an Iranian research facility that was damaged in a mysterious explosion in November was a prototype with a range of 9600 kilometres - enough to reach the US.
Mr Yaalon said that only the threat of a punishing military strike would compel the Iranian regime to abandon its nuclear ambitions.
''The West has the ability to strike, but as long as Iran isn't convinced that there's a determination to follow through with it, they will continue with their manipulations,'' he said.
At the same conference, Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak said military action needed to be considered if economic sanctions failed to deter Iran, and the window for action was closing fast.
But he said there was now widespread global understanding that an attack may be necessary.
Several of the Republicans now vying for their party's 2012 presidential nomination have attacked the Obama administration for not threatening more clearly a strike against Iran should it continue to defy international demands for greater transparency of its nuclear program. They have accused the President of leaving the tough talk mostly to Israel.
Mr Panetta's view that Israel would go it alone, possibly in April or May, was first reported by The Washington Post, which said the Defence Secretary was increasingly alarmed at the prospect of a unilateral strike. CNN later said it had confirmed the story via a source within the administration.
In Brussels for a meeting of NATO defence ministers, Mr Panetta declined to discuss in detail the reports, but said: ''Israel has indicated that they're considering this [in public statements], and we have indicated our concerns.''
Analysts believe only US bunker-busting bombs could penetrate deep enough underground to take out Iran's nuclear facilities, explaining Israel's urgency in seeking to co-opt US support for a strike.
Mr Barak said that should the facilities be too deeply embedded, they would no longer be susceptible to Israeli air strikes alone. Washington and the European Union have imposed increasingly tough sanctions on Iran recently, prompting the regime of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to warn it would close the Strait of Hormuz shipping lane if it was prevented from exporting its crude oil, a move the US has said it would not tolerate.
The EU agreed last month to ban Iranian oil imports as of July 1 and freeze assets of its central bank and eight other entities. The US has also imposed restrictions on financial transactions with Iran.
Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency completed talks this week aimed at resolving Western suspicions about its nuclear program, which Iran insists is for peaceful purposes only. They are due to meet again on February 21.
Meanwhile, former US defence secretary Bob Gates warned about the dangers of a new war in the region, telling CNN that ''if Iraq and Afghanistan have taught us anything in recent history, it is the unpredictability of war and that these things are easier to get into than to get out of''.
He added: ''This is, I think, one of the toughest foreign policy problems I have ever seen since entering the government 45 years ago.''
New Iranian missile 'could strike US'
