What's new

New Iranian Fighter vis-a-vis AMCA/LCA

.
India rejected F-16 as a part of MMRCA.

China is yet to have a single plane equivalent to F-16.

LCA is comparable to contemporary planes.

China is yet to get beyond 1960s technology (.. and even that they got from erstwhile soviet union).

Enough said.

Idiots like you is the reason why India wann mess up with China, I will call it blindly ignorant.

Don't compare LCA with anything PLAAF has, cause it is not inducted yet. IOC/FOC?
 
. .
''LCA will inducted into IAF soon'' :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


:rofl: :rofl:

JF-17 or J-10 do not deserve any more of a counter than a Mig-21 :rofl: rofl: :rofl:

Su-30 MKI decision was an overkill back in 1996 ...... hence, LCA and Rafale are technology upgradation with nobody particular in mind. Neither faces a worthy regional competitor.

Please let us know, when you've retired your useless J-$hits and can comeup with something close to a contemporary fighter.

:laugh:
 
. .
no doubt. india is strong!!! :D

On the spot. :tup:

But what's more important is India's strength brings stability and good things to the world.

So, just being strong is not enough. There are things beyond that.

And they are important...
 
. .
.
Idiots like you is the reason why India wann mess up with China, I will call it blindly ignorant.

Don't compare LCA with anything PLAAF has, cause it is not inducted yet. IOC/FOC?

Even JF-17 is not inducted by Chinese Airforce because it failed and now taken by PAF because no one else giving them plane and they cant buy it. PAF cant buy F-16 or any other plane , the only option left JF17.

Any flying thing is not successful. Other Chinese failed because despite PAK asking china didn't give them the other planes because that will expose their plane failure.

OR PAK didnt buy other Chinese plane because they know after JF-17 what they can expect from china's other plane, In-fact no other country buyed JF-17

Moreover ,
 
.

Ordering for what?

Some old Su-27SKs still use the AL-31F engines, we all know that.

And J-31 engines use the Russian engines, the Russians immediately take the credit, while J-20 does not, since the Russians never mentioned about the engines. :coffee:
 
. .
Ordering for what?

Some old Su-27SKs still use the AL-31F engines, we all know that.

And J-31 engines use the Russian engines, the Russians immediately take the credit, while J-20 does not, since the Russians never mentioned about the engines. :coffee:

ws 10 TAKES 2 mins of full thrust as of now PLAAF is unhappy with it j15/j20 all critical equipment is armed with AL31FN that gives better performance so that plane does'nt go boom.

A j11bhs crashed because of this (ws 10).
 
.
ws 10 TAKES 2 mins of full thrust as of now PLAAF is unhappy with it j15/j20 all critical equipment is armed with AL31FN that gives better performance so that plane does'nt go boom.

A j11bhs crashed because of this (ws 10).

According your own imagination, the PLAAF is indeed not happy with the WS-10 engine. :coffee:
 
.
At the 2012 Zhuhai Airshow, for instance, the WS-10 Taihang was not displayed in any form, although the lower-performance Ukrainian-derived Minshan turbofan (for the L-15 trainer) was displayed for the first time. A wide range of other jet engines are under development.

PLAAF has same opnion of WS 10 as IAF has on Kaveri K9 MONEY/TIME WASTE
 
.
The topic was F-313 and all I see here is F-16, J-17, J-10, J-20, LCA, Su-27, Su-30MKi....lol.
Indians must admit that the government run DRDO, HAL and ADA are masters in making card board models ans power point presentations. Oops sorry my bad...they can't eve make card board models...the AMCA model placed in AERO 2013 didn't had LE sweep...lol. And they placed it in an international event....shame shame.
At least the Iranian have flown something (F-313) which is a generation ahead of LCA, and not a crap card board model like AMCA. People complaining about cockpit, size etc...first go and make one of your own before pointing faults in others success.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom