New Charge Sheet Links Tablighi Jamaat & Deoband to Delhi Riots

[Joe Shearer]

I don't give a flying F about what you call me. Scream into a mirror that'd be the best you can do, but your naming won't change simple facts. And, there is no evidence for your claim other than hearsay. Keep trying.

Is it reasonable to react to criticism with this kind of extremely defensive response? It makes it seem that you are sensitive to the weakness of your position, and therefore get angry when this is pointed out.

The classic definition of a riot. One side instigates, other side retaliates and goes into a vicious cycle.
Which media tho? Right-wing media you mean. The place I live in the media solely blamed BJP and two channels were shut down for a night for "biased" reporting of riots, which I kinda agree. Why blame on Kapil Mishra alone, although his speech is instigating, did no riots happen before the major riots? Did nobody call for riots before him? Did no protests ended in riots?
Funnily enough, a group of miscreants approached media personnel on bikes stopped them and grabbed his collar, and he started screaming, arrey bhai mein Muslim hoon check my ID with that Mallu accent on live TV so that he may be 'released' and he was.

Your argument is not clear.

 

[Chhatrapati]

What great logic. You heard of the Jallianwala massacre you punk? Those people protesting were also inciting a riot now were they?

Did they not?

 

[xeuss]

Even I had hopes for this particular "centrist" poster. He has revealed himself to be a Hindutvadi scumbag like the rest.

Centrists are those who enable and normalize fascism. They are in fact more dangerous.

 

[El Sidd]

Did they not?

oo shining India

 

[Shantanu_Left]

"Both sides?"

An argument Hindutvadis of India have derived from their baap, Donald Trump of USA, another tyrant in that country. For the first time since Civil Rights era, we are seeing such massive protests against US government on their own turf.

Trump had originally proposed "both sides" argument to protect the NRA and gun rights lobby in the USA after a fatal school shootout. That is because the gunslingers are the number one voting base of his party.

And now in India we hear this "both sides" argument used so frequently. It's like Donald Trump is more than just a favorite US President for India's Sanghis: he is also their mentor, philosopher, and guide.

When scumbags meet scumbags: White supremacists and Hindutvadis of India, a marriage made in Hell.

 

[Pakistani Fighter]

Bye Bye Tableeghi Jamaat. They are probably going to get banned or Persecuted while Bajrang Dal, Arya Samaj, Hindu Samaj, RSS are going to roam free.

 

[El Sidd]

Bye Bye Tableeghi Jamaat. They are probably going to get banned or Persecuted while Bajrang Dal, Arya Samaj, Hindu Samaj, RSS are going to roam free.

Next Rai Barreily

 

[Shantanu_Left]

Centrists are those who enable and normalize fascism. They are in fact more dangerous.

We have a saying in Punjabi "bin paindi da lota". That's what these centrists of India are all like.

The thing is that if Congress or any non-BJP government comes to power again, they will again start "swinging" on our side. But I am particularly done with them. Can't trust these people anymore.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Centrists are those who enable and normalize fascism. They are in fact more dangerous.

I don't agree.

I consider myself a centrist, and equidistant between left and right.

What @Chhatrapati has done is very, very disappointing.

 

[xeuss]

Did they not?

Can you post any video showing where Delhi Police is enabling Muslim mobs to attack Hindu homes in Maujpur or the surrounding areas.

 

[El Sidd]

Next Rai Barreily

Why you ask or how you ask?

Well UP Yogi took over the Waqf conveniently in midst of corruption scandal and money laundering.

Ye to Hoga !!!!

 

[Shantanu_Left]

I don't agree.

I consider myself a centrist, and equidistant between left and right.

What @Chhatrapati has done is very, very disappointing.

Shut up, you're a damned Commie.

 

[Chhatrapati]

Is it reasonable to react to criticism with this kind of extremely defensive response? It makes it seem that you are sensitive to the weakness of your position, and therefore get angry when this is pointed out.



Your argument is not clear.

I stand by what I said, I'm not trying to defend my position in any way if I am wrong I am wrong. I don't believe this riot started one day out of the blue just because a Kapil Misra said "goli maro". I could start with CAB and the following 'protests', but at this point it's pointless and this is PDF.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Bye Bye Tableeghi Jamaat. They are probably going to get banned or Persecuted while Bajrang Dal, Arya Samaj, Hindu Samaj, RSS are going to roam free.

I don't think much of the Tableegh. Their leadership was really irresponsible. Also having been at the receiving end of Tableeghi enthusiasm, nothing wrong with banning them; whether or not there is equitable treatment and the Bajrang Dal, and RSS are also banned (why you have dragged in the Arya Samaj is not clear) is a different matter.

 

[xeuss]

I don't agree.

I consider myself a centrist, and equidistant between left and right.

What @Chhatrapati has done is very, very disappointing.

Why are you surprised when you should have known his antecedents all along?

You may consider yourself as a "centrist", but our definitions do not jive. Not once, have you defended any form of brutality or fascism, and not once have you blamed a victim.

I propose that you coin yourself another term, as centrist does not do you justice.