What's new

New body armour Virtus for infantry troops of British army to increase agility of soldier.

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
54,470
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Infantry troops of British Army are set to benefit from a new body armour system which will increase agility and make it easier to carry heavy kit. The new personal armour, known as Virtus, uses the latest materials and offers the same protection as the Osprey system but it is significantly lighter, moves with the body more easily and produces a slimmer profile.

New_body_armour_Virtus_for_infantry_troops_of_British_army_to_increase_agility_of_soldier_640_001.jpg
New body armour for British army infantry troops.


The Virtus system has been tested by soldiers from The Royal Engineers, Royal Artillery, The Yorkshire Regiment, The Rifles, The Parachute Regiment, The Mercian Regiment as well as the Royal Marines, with troops providing feedback on all design elements. The experiences of troops who served in Iraq and Afghanistan have also helped to design the new armour.

The level of protection employed can be scaled up or down to match the type of threat by adding or removing soft armour pads and hard ballistic plates.

Lt Col Rob O’Connor (Yorks), commanding officer of the Infantry Trials and Development Unit, explained: “Commanders can select a level of armour using a combination that they think is sufficient for the situation. This allows them to scale back the amount of protection in favour of agility if they want.”

As well as protection, the new body armour is designed to aid load-carriage, with even distribution of weight and reduced bulkiness. Troops operating in Afghanistan were carrying average loads that reached around 56 kilograms.

Virtus is 4.7 kilograms lighter than Osprey and will become lighter still once new armour plates, which are in development, are introduced.

New_body_armour_for_infantry_troops_of_British_army_which_increases_agility_and_to_carry_heavy_kit_640_001.jpg
New lighter helmet of Virtus system


The new system also has a quick-release mechanism – a pin positioned on the chest that when pulled releases the entire body kit – to aid safe extraction from hazardous situations such as burning vehicles or water. This replaces the Velcro straps that soldiers currently have to rip open to release their body armour.

A new, lighter helmet will provide increased blunt impact protection, face and mandible guards for certain roles and a shape that is designed to work with the armour and daysack so weapons can be comfortably used even in a prone position.

The headgear features a permanent universal mount for the night vision scope and a scalable counterweight that is attached to the helmet’s rear when the system is in place to ease strain on the wearer’s neck.

One of the most radical innovations is an integral spine, the so-called dynamic weight distribution (DWD) system. The device is linked to the user’s waist belt and helps spread the load of the body armour, a Bergen or daysack across the back, shoulders and hips.

The wearer is able to adjust the weight bias to his or her preference with one hand via a small controller in the small of the back. So on long marches, for instance, troops can opt for the most efficient set-up where most of the burden is towards the hips and away from the shoulders, increasing comfort and stamina.increasing

New body armour Virtus for infantry troops of British army to increase agility of soldier 11107152 | weapons defence industry military technology UK | analyse focus army defence military industry army
 
. . .
.
Why not Sindh Govt. allow them to produce it at home for Rangers and Police with CTD.
 
. . . .
f4a20b19cb1e085fa217bf6bc0003afa.jpg

You think that is bulky?
Meet the new Russian "Ratnik" armor. The whole army won't be using this, Only Grenadiers and heavy Gunners will be using it, mainly to assault positions in urban enviornment.
Also, Meet the "Barmista" suit.
Barmitsa53.jpg

Do these new armors remind anyone of this?
original.jpg


Plus, the ones that Lyra makes is just a copy of US Interceptor armor:
ACU-1i.jpg

P1010636.JPG

P1010639.JPG

Interceptor Body Armour - Lyra (Pvt) Ltd
 
.
f4a20b19cb1e085fa217bf6bc0003afa.jpg

You think that is bulky?
Meet the new Russian "Ratnik" armor. The whole army won't be using this, Only Grenadiers and heavy Gunners will be using it, mainly to assault positions in urban enviornment.
Also, Meet the "Barmista" suit.
Barmitsa53.jpg

Do these new armors remind anyone of this?
original.jpg


Plus, the ones that Lyra makes is just a copy of US Interceptor armor:
ACU-1i.jpg

P1010636.JPG

P1010639.JPG

Interceptor Body Armour - Lyra (Pvt) Ltd

Walking turkey shoot.
 
.
f4a20b19cb1e085fa217bf6bc0003afa.jpg

You think that is bulky?
Meet the new Russian "Ratnik" armor. The whole army won't be using this, Only Grenadiers and heavy Gunners will be using it, mainly to assault positions in urban enviornment.
Also, Meet the "Barmista" suit.
Barmitsa53.jpg

Do these new armors remind anyone of this?
original.jpg


Plus, the ones that Lyra makes is just a copy of US Interceptor armor:
ACU-1i.jpg

P1010636.JPG

P1010639.JPG

Interceptor Body Armour - Lyra (Pvt) Ltd

Looks like the one from Halo
 
.
Walking turkey shoot.
Except this "Turkey" will have a fully automatic PKP shooting at you...
As I said, this will be used against terrorists like the chechens in urban areas. It may prove to be a good idea.
 
.
Except this "Turkey" will have a fully automatic PKP shooting at you...
As I said, this will be used against terrorists like the chechens in urban areas. It may prove to be a good idea.

If the poor sod who has to wear it can even get to the area of operations. In Afghan we were operating with around 50+ Kg worth of equipment on average no matter what combat role (light, mech, armoured). A soldier simply becomes a pack mule (ergo combat ineffective) when he has to lug about over 25+ Kg. The British soldier really proved his worth by being able to be effective to a certain extent with that average load.

I know one thing for sure, anyone wearing that suit will be redders and sod that!
 
.
If the poor sod who has to wear it can even get to the area of operations. In Afghan we were operating with around 50+ Kg worth of equipment on average no matter what combat role (light, mech, armoured). A soldier simply becomes a pack mule (ergo combat ineffective) when he has to lug about over 25+ Kg. The British soldier really proved his worth by being able to be effective to a certain extent with that average load.

I know one thing for sure, anyone wearing that suit will be redders and sod that!
Grigori+there+is+no+needing+of+armor+when+can+of+_666669e0e13101a4dc226c3d37e1295a (1).jpg

IS NO PROBLEM. IVAN WILL OF BEINGS INVINCIBLE IN SUIT AND STALIN WILL GUIDE HIS BOOLET. XAXAXAXAXAXAAAXXA.... but suit have no vodka holder... chyort voz'mi.

I think they may have found an alternative:
X3GsgEv.jpg
 
.
They will suffer from heat stroke and over weight if they wearing this in hot and wet climate tropical jungle like Indonesia

Standard body armor in Indonesia
11410505_466090270228665_1975115981_n.jpg
 
.
Back
Top Bottom