What's new

New Army Chief - A Threat to National Security?

Henry

BANNED
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
297
Reaction score
0
On the weekend prior to demitting office, General V K Singh, using the media, publicly firebombed the government one last time as Chief of Army Staff (COAS). Separately interviewed by the main television channels intent on wringing the last few drops of sensationalism out of the situation, he gave notice that the government can expect more criticism in the future. Actually, a retired VK may prove a bigger thorn in the Congress coalition government’s side. In the know of everything that’s afoot in the army, and all the decisions in the pipeline, VK can be expected to hold his successor’s, the defence ministry’s, and the government’s feet to the fire. Several of VK’s immediate predecessors, it was known in army circles, were susceptible to corruption — the reason why his elevation two years back was welcomed by great many upright serving and retired officers. This, of course, raises the question: How is it that persons with soiled reputations get effortlessly promoted in the army, even as genuinely capable officers have their careers sidelined? The explanation is that a motivated army chief can play havoc with the promotion boards — throw out the grain, keep the chaff. I mean, how does a Tejinder Singh, the conduit for ****** lucre as alleged by VK, become director-general, Defence Intelligence Agency, for god’s sake?

One issue, however, remains unanswered: Why did VK approach the Supreme Court to ‘restore’ his honour, rather than asking for an adjudication on his age? By making his personal ‘honour’ the principal legal concern, VK afforded the court which was wary of getting sucked into this controversy the escape route of getting the government to withdraw the offending document that reiterated the wrong age. It is no use for him to now claim that the judges were leaning in the direction “the wind was blowing”. He undermined his own chances and voided the possibility of a ruling on whether or not, for government service purposes, the school-board exam certificate is the only proof.

The in-coming COAS, General Bikram Singh, doesn’t have the soldierly credentials of VK and, during his tenure, will be operating under a cloud, his every decision under the microscope. He will be like the teacher’s pet appointed class monitor on the basis of connections, not merit.
In Bikram’s case, the ‘succession plan’ crafted by General J J Singh, ignobly furthered by his successor, Deepak Kapoor, involved in the Adarsh housing scam, and diligently propelled by the government, will hang round his neck like the dead albatross on the ancient mariner.

Despite burning its fingers, this government is apparently convinced that pre-selection is a good thing and the next man in has already been so anointed. Except, by putting the present GOC, III Corps, Lieutenant General Dalbir Singh Suhag’s promotion as army commander on hold, VK has presented Bikram with a dilemma. He countermands VK’s rules-wise correct show-cause notice to Suhag, as desired by many in the government, and he further besmirches his reputation. Or, he lets the order stand, derails the next stage of the succession plan of an army command for Suhag, and courts enmity of the very people who helped him reach the top. Bikram’s strength of character, or lack of it, will soon become evident.

Many people wonder if VK’s actions have ‘politicised’ the army. In a citizen army, the average officer and jawan alike is socially conscious and politically aware. However, army discipline and tight-lipped, straight-backed demeanour are usually mistaken for political naivete by politicians and civil servants. It is the use by the latter two of their own more elastic morality and ethics in dealing with the military and when deciding on national security matters that poses the greatest danger to the republic.


The Congress has a track record of destroying institutions by playing favourites. Indira Gandhi undermined the integrity of the Indian Administrative Service during Emergency from which the IAS has not recovered. Constitutional rights were suspended and a ‘committed bureaucracy’ obtained by choosing select babus for certain posts. These babus bent rules and did her bidding. Up until then, promotions were generally on merit, and postings of civil servants were as per vacancy, and the entire process was managed by the chief secretaries in the states and the cabinet secretary at the Centre. It was too useful an innovation, however, for subsequent non-Congress governments to give up, except they were less brazen about it than the Congress.

Unfortunately, during Emergency some favour-seekers among flag-rank officers, disregarding a military officer’s code of conduct, visited persons believed close to Sanjay Gandhi. That era is long gone, but uniformed officers still seek politicians’ help in promotions and postings, albeit more discreetly these days. However, if pre-selecting favourites for the top posts in the three Armed Services becomes the new norm, there’s nothing to stop the venal politician-bureaucrat nexus from auctioning off these posts to officers who promise the most returns, in the manner Delhi Police and other state police reportedly do when filling positions in ‘lucrative’ police thanas. See where this is going?
The frightening thing to consider is that the Congress government is now insinuating practices it has perfected elsewhere in government in its dealings with the military.

Hoisting chosen persons into choice slots is one such practice.

The motivation is not hard to fathom.

With thousands of billions of dollars worth of hardware purchases in the pipeline, if you apply the 15 per cent standard, revealed by the Confederation of Indian Industry’s then top honcho, Tarun Das, in the Nira Radia tapes, that amounts to how much by way of commission/cut to the politicians?


Do the math. In the event, it is good business to appoint your own chaps to manipulate the field tests, the weapons short list, and the terms from foreign suppliers.

The fact is the Armed Forces being a microcosm of Indian society, most of the societal ills have been steadily seeping into the military for a while now. Like all things bad their progress has been rapid.

No favouritism in army | V K Singh | A K Antony | The New Indian Express
 
. .
Any news if anybody checked the date of birth of the new COAS to avoid problems later?
 
. .
Since it wen to the court I'm sure the decision will be fair.. Let him have the satisfaction to go that way.
 
.
This article is complete BS- there is no political bias in the IA. The assertions that COAS Bikram Singh will be any more pro-Congress than any predecessor is absurd as promotion to this post is done solely by seniority at time of previous incumbent COAS's retirement-THAT IS ALL. The media, and others, have twisted and manipulated the saga into more than it was. It was clear from the day VK Singh took office and his May 31st 2012 retirement date was confirmed who was going to be COAS and no political meddling could/did interfere with this. This is how IA have worked for almost 70 years.

I am getting sick and tired of the Indian media with little to no actual knowledge on the subject matter and, in many cases ,political bias producing article after article that is complete nonsense and purely harmful to the subject matter. This is NOT journalism.
 
.
This article is complete BS- there is no political bias in the IA.

With the personal feuds between VK Singh and the government, one can safely say this statement already doesn't hold valid and while I think VK only remained verbal, Bikram will surprise everyone further. He's a person with a nasty record.
 
.
With the personal feuds between VK Singh and the government, one can safely say this statement already doesn't hold valid and while I think VK only remained verbal, Bikram will surprise everyone further. He's a person with a nasty record.


^^^



blah_blah_blah.jpg
 
. .
With the personal feuds between VK Singh and the government, one can safely say this statement already doesn't hold valid and while I think VK only remained verbal, Bikram will surprise everyone further. He's a person with a nasty record.
blah_blah.jpg
 
.
Give the new guy a chance .. he may have had some minus points but that means that all his actions will be scrutinized.

You cannot do arbitrary things in such a big organization, especially when people are watching you closely.

I think VK Singh did a good job of exposing corruption.

As regards the new Chief, read the opinion of a veteran who has fought for India since 1947 - Ethics, ethos and the new Chief | The Asian Age by Lt Gen (Retd) SK Sinha.
 
.
A strong lobby working overtime to discredit army.

How?

1. Till the previous chief spent nearly 18 months, there was no talk about his age issue. He chose the timing when the centre faced flack from SC on the appointment of CVC. Somebody, would have thought to give the body blow to a democratically elected govt by raking up the issue with some corruption allegations to spice up the situation.

Who can do that? Who can be benefited out of it?

2. Then a group raked up communal angle to the appointment of possibly the most secular institution on earth.


Who can do that? Who can be benefited out of it?

3. All this are coming after certain investigations pointed to a type of terrorism in which an Army guy caught and being languishing in jail. There is definitely certain level of infiltration by a certain communal organization which is the complementary body of JUD in Pakistan.

Who can do that? Who can be benefited out of it?

The last three years' hyper activity against many institutions by certain organizations having tactical support by a major national party; point to a very elaborate conspiracy.

We the flag bearer of a secular and tolerant India needs to be active and alert to each such devious attempt by these nefarious forces....Jai Hind.
 
. .
With the personal feuds between VK Singh and the government, one can safely say this statement already doesn't hold valid and while I think VK only remained verbal, Bikram will surprise everyone further. He's a person with a nasty record.

What that means mate is that the IA is not partial to a particular political party. The IA and specifically the Chief can disagree with the government of the day and its policies or its management.

And i do not think that Bikram will give any surprises to the govt. I think he would agree with everything that the MoD wants, given how the govt has been adamant to ensure that a particular succession line was followed for IA. Its pretty much evident MoD wanted Bikram to become the COAS.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom