Luckily, I have a PhD in a relevant from a good US university. Done now with the personal attacking (and lack of substantive points)?
Sure. Like I said, I'm weak weak weak. Ask around here just how weak.
Your words give clue about your intelligence; no need a paper or a few ''buddy'' for you to convince me unless you have a weak personality that seeks others' approval for her/his intellectual existance.
With your own posts, Your intelligence has so far earned the title of cheap talker and weak debater, it seems your intelligence run away from the challenge based on law and international treaty. Here is what you said:
Individual politicians and official representatives of the State are two entirely different entities. Therein lies the problem.
Will you yet again run away with side topics or give a straigth answer via the window of law and int. treaty?
Anyway, this is all totally unrelated to the issue over which Turkey and Netherlands have a spat, which further illustrates how Erdogan (and, judging from your post, with some succes) is seeking and playing a self-ignited external conflict to mask his own weakness at home. All that was necessary was coming around a week later. But nooooooo, ....he is just seeking to add fuel to make a small fire into a blaze. This man is jeopardizing 400+ years of good relations with NL, just so he can remain in his chair. I wish him and you and Turkey good luck.
The Srebrenica genocide was brougt onto the table by you in our debate.
the stance of Dutch soldiers in Srebrenica gives us some clue about the Dutch society with respect to the Islam, Muslims and Turks.
Dutch people today support a leader named Wilder, who openly has many times repeated the same Dutch stance in Srebrenica with words in his rhetoric, also confirmed that it has actually a deep root in the Dutch society, which keeps growing in minds, but also started to turn into attacks as seen in the current situation. Apperantly, Dutch people look for another Hitler like ''leader'', that explains the popularity of Wilder in the Dutch society. the difference between Hitler Germany and Wilder Nerherlands is:
I wouldn't know because it didn't go down the way you portray, as is evident from a ton of Dutch and international reports on the whole period. Your remark about the court ruling is actually incorrect: the court ruled that 8000-60 cases were NOT the responsibility of the Dutch soldiers and hence NOT eligible for compensation. And that sums up the state of your knowledge and debating skill.
Blablabla. Get a life.
Let's see Srebrenica through the eyes of the Dutch.
Dossier Srebrenica: “The Netherlands could use this to show its worth and Dutch prestige would be enhanced in the world”.
On July 11, Mladic entered the town declaring he was giving Srebrenica “as a gift to the Serbian people for all the many humiliations they had suffered down the centuries at the hands of the Turks”. (people were)“slaughtered like beasts”.
Dutch troops had offered no resistance and instead supervised the exodus of refugees, which is “tantamount to collaborating with ethnic cleansing”.
Pictures were published in the press of drunken Dutchbat soldiers and of Karremans himself raising a toast to Mladic.
As it is seen, Your own country admits that They took part in the genocide, and ''celebrated'' the collaboration with champagne.
Humiliation is your destiny as in that case and this debate.
.
