Since you're moving from Tibet to Kashmir as the subject matter, India STILL hasn't reclaimed the half of Kashmir that Pakistan snatched in 1947 so do enlighten me on how that squares up with your maps. It's now a matter of time before the rest falls, all thanks to hindutva no less.
The purpose of bringing in Kashmir to compare to the topic at hand (Nepalese map change) is to draw similarities and learn from the righteous Pakistanis on how to deal with such a situation, since Pakistan has been facing this all along. I suppose it would also perhaps help Pakistanis to temper their reaction to such news given their own inability to control or change the passing of resolutions in other countries without any material change on the ground.
and on topic, the similarities between the two situations exist:
1. Just like Nepal, India made a unilateral change in the status of a territory.
2. India does claim GB and P0K in entirety. That claim exists (including on maps), similar to Nepal’s, but no action to wrest the areas from the “occupier” has been initiated or fruitful.
Pakistan has never been your "buddy". We're here to dismember your pseudo-country and restore it to its rightful place as the sick man of the subcontinent. However, I was always taught by Indian friends that Nepal was part of hindutva's inner circle, a peaceful hindu majority nation who would work with India for millennia to come, right?
I do love honesty. So at least you’re honest with your intentions.
I’ve always known Pakistanis to be very emotional people with a very simplistic zero sum game mentality when it comes to relationships.
Nepal’s politics and it’s people are two different things. The “inner circle” of Hinduism is a reference to the acceptance of their people of similar faith, much like Pakistan’s relations with Iran. However, Nepal’s politics under Oli has changed and so as a nation, they may not be as aligned with India.
So you equating all relationships to remain the same (politics and people to people) is either you being simple or playing dumb to score brownie points against the indian forum members. Either of those choices is fine.
I just expected you to be a more pragmatic chap who understood these intricacies.
Pakistan was opposed to Delhi in 1947, as it was in 2019. Nothing has really changed between you and me. It's your buddies you should now worry about, not your lifelong enemies.
“You make peace with your enemies, not your friends”
Nepal will remain India’s friend, and this will be solved diplomatically. My only concern is for Pakistanis cheerleading from the side for a war between India and Nepal. Unfortunately, they maybe terribly disappointed with the result.