What's new

Neo-Indus nationalism does not work

Status
Not open for further replies.
. . . .
Not needed. What is being contrived here by wishful convoluted flights of fancy simply will not work. I can still enjoy the spectacle of such fraudulent revisionism, though. :D

Revisionism?
bhai, Pakistan was made for the Muslims of North-West India
Blame Iqbal who said that
Pakistan essentially was a 'geographic' concept based on the religion of the majority of the inhabitants of that 'specific geographic area'
:D
 
.
Pakistan essentially was a 'geographic' concept based on the religion of the majority of the inhabitants of that 'specific geographic area'

Yes, this geographic region was the northwest portion of British India. The connection to IVC in this proposal is non-existent and the fraudulent revisionism refers to the present attempts to create one. It just does not work.
 
.
Yes, this geographic region was the northwest portion of British India. The connection to IVC in this proposal is non-existent and the fraudulent revisionism refers to the present attempts to create one. It just does not work.

Well, I didn't mention IVC, I only mentioned the Indus region. Have you even read my posts?
You, however, are free to believe that IVC is not connected to the Indus region :D
 
. .
Well, I didn't mention IVC, I only mentioned the Indus region. Have you even read my posts?
You, however, are free to believe that IVC is not connected to the Indus region :D

That's cute, but what the proposal was an administrative unit comprised of the northwest portion of British India, that is all, for the Muslims, within or without the British Empire, with even total independence optional. The Indus river still runs through it, yes, but the claim that the proposal was somehow based on Pakistan as the future of the ancient IVC is total hogwash. Try reading the OP again, please.
 
.
Not needed. What is being contrived here by wishful convoluted flights of fancy simply will not work. I can still enjoy the spectacle of such fraudulent revisionism, though. :D

Maybe @Joe Shearer and @Nilgiri will wish to chime in on such an entertaining thread?

I will just sit back and watch for now :pop:

Taimur Khurram vs Indus Pakistan seems like it would have good potential like a good street fighter matchup ...say Ken vs Ryu

ROUND 1 FIGHT!...Hadouken! Hadouken!
 
.
I will just sit back and watch for now :pop:

Taimur Khurram vs Indus Pakistan seems like it would have good potential like a good street fighter matchup ...say Ken vs Ryu

ROUND 1 FIGHT!...Hadouken! Hadouken!

Save a seat for me, I think I will revert to mere spectatorship for now. :D
 
.
Is Mr. Zarvanullah Zarvan already dethroned as forum's resident mullah? o_O
 
.
That's cute, but what the proposal was an administrative unit comprised of the northwest portion of British India, that is all, for the Muslims, within or without the British Empire, with even total independence optional. The Indus river still runs through it, yes, but the claim that the proposal was somehow based on Pakistan as the future of the ancient IVC is total hogwash. Try reading the OP again, please.

As stated earlier, You, of course, are free to believe that IVC is not connected to North-West India or the Indus region.... But you are going to look like a fool if you try to claim that :D
 
. . .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom