Need 'solid evidence' to back Azhar ban at UN: China

[AKD]

Does released after a plane hijacking and forming a terrorist organization count??

 

[Lurch Adams]

Does released after a plane hijacking and forming a terrorist organization count??

Nope. Plane hijacking is not a terrorist act in China. It is like a traffic violation with fine. They are not sissies like us.

 

[Indika]

Did Masood Azhar hijacked the plane ?

Good logic, would you be ok if terrorists in your country use the same logic? did lal masjid mullah hold a gun and fire at the security forces? did mullah fazllullah personally accompany suicide bombers to pakistan and press the trigger?
Escaping with terrorists help wont make him a saint, it only reaffirms the fact he is a terrorist.

probably your next perverted logic would be that masood azhar does not how to pilot a plane so he is not responsible.

Nope. Plane hijacking is not a terrorist act in China. It is like a traffic violation with fine. They are not sissies like us.

hypocritical double standards of the highest order. If he is not a terrorist why not a trial by a UN or international court.

 

[I S I]

Hamara terrorist, terrorist.
Tumhara terrorist, NSA?!

 

[Bratva]

Good logic, would you be ok if terrorists in your country use the same logic? did lal masjid mullah hold a gun and fire at the security forces? did mullah fazllullah personally accompany suicide bombers to pakistan and press the trigger?
Escaping with terrorists help wont make him a saint, it only reaffirms the fact he is a terrorist.

probably your next perverted logic would be that masood azhar does not how to pilot a plane so he is not responsible.


hypocritical double standards of the highest order. If he is not a terrorist why not a trial by a UN or international court.

Nope. Plane hijacking is not a terrorist act in China. It is like a traffic violation with fine. They are not sissies like us.

If you ever think about for a second, that what you call a perverted logic, Did India ever tried to Ban masood Azhar on the basis of Airplane hijacking ? I mean if you think for a second, it will dawn upon you, at that time Masood azhar was in indian jail. Remain on topic, dont bring your perverted logics to distort the topic at hand. More intelligent people inside your country understand this matter hence they didnt tried that Hijacking plane angle.

Now back to topic, Why Sawami Assemanand was released despite his confession of killing Innocent Pakistanis in Samjhota express ?

 

[egodoc222]

Laugh while you can....when next terrorist attack by jud happens...we'll see where China keeps it's head! Lol

 

[deep.ocean]

China spending heavily on Azhar, hoping his organisation will help sissy PLA to protect CPEC in Azad Kashmir.
My 2 centd

 

[sbh02]

I think the Bharatis are forgetting that the BJP was the one that released Maulana Masood Azhar.

 

[Indika]

If you ever think about for a second, that what you call a perverted logic, Did India ever tried to Ban masood Azhar on the basis of Airplane hijacking ? I mean if you think for a second, it will dawn upon you, at that time Masood azhar was in indian jail. Remain on topic, dont bring your perverted logics to distort the topic at hand. More intelligent people inside your country understand this matter hence they didnt tried that Hijacking plane angle.

Now back to topic, Why Sawami Assemanand was released despite his confession of killing Innocent Pakistanis in Samjhota express ?

As I said apply the same logic to the terrorists in your country and lets see if it helps.
As far as samjauta express is concerned, it is political mudslinging indulged by congress. Lets say for argument sake aseemanand indeed a terrorist, then there should have been more terrorist attacks in India by him & his group. Why stop at only one? did all muslims in India vanish away? India as a state policy does not support terrorists and we dont need a certificate from pakistan.

Instead of vain arguments hand let pakistan hand over masood azhar to a UN court for a fair trial then we will see where your country stands wrt to law. So much so for his innocence that masood azhar cannot travel by air out side pakistan other than with a fake identity. These are nothing but delusional arguments for self consumption.

 

[sbh02]

As I said apply the same logic to the terrorists in your country and lets see if it helps.
As far as samjauta express is concerned, it is political mudslinging indulged by congress. Lets say for argument sake aseemanand indeed a terrorist, then there should have been more terrorist attacks in India by him & his group.

The victims that were killed were mostly Pakistanis.

There have been plenty of attacks in India conducted by Hindutva terrorists, but your country has not apprehended those terrorists.

 

[Razia Sultana]

In the UNSC only China is protecting Masood Azhar. Rest of the members are fine with the 'solidity' of the evidences against him.
My reading suggests that India is perfectly fine with the Pakistan and China defending Masood Azhar, Hafiz Saeed and Dawood Ibrahim as it gives India more ammo to corner and embarrass the friendly duo. Reminds me of Clive Lloyd dropping the catch of Geoffrey Boycott in 1979 world cup finals as the more he batted the more England was losing the chance to win.
I am curious to know about the criminal procedure laws of China. If a crime takes place in China do they wait and not arrest a suspect unless they have collected 'solid' evidences against him? And who decides if the evidences are solid or not? What solid evidence of terror act they have against Dalai Lama, Dolkun Isa and Rebiya Kadeer?

 

[Rajput Warrior]

In the UNSC only China is protecting Masood Azhar. Rest of the members are fine with the 'solidity' of the evidences against him.
My reading suggests that India is perfectly fine with the Pakistan and China defending Masood Azhar, Hafiz Saeed and Dawood Ibrahim as it gives India more ammo to corner and embarrass the friendly duo. Reminds me of Clive Lloyd dropping the catch of Geoffrey Boycott in 1979 world cup finals as the more he batted the more England was losing the chance to win.
I am curious to know about the criminal procedure laws of China. If a crime takes place in China do they wait and not arrest a suspect unless they have collected 'solid' evidences against him? And who decides if the evidences are solid or not? What solid evidence of terror act they have against Dalai Lama, Dolkun Isa and Rebiya Kadeer?

Aray rajia Ji ammo say ap nay kya uthar liya?


Sirf cheekh cheekh k apna gala kharab kar liye.

 

[NakedLunch]

The victims that were killed were mostly Pakistanis.

There have been plenty of attacks in India conducted by Hindutva terrorists, but your country has not apprehended those terrorists.

Hindu terrorists killed 1000 Gujarati Muslims in just a few days. An orgy of violence and the chief pimp of that violence was their current terrorist PM Modi. Hindus should never take a holier than thou attitude on violence. They are just as capable as the ISIS lunatics

 

[sbh02]

In the UNSC only China is protecting Masood Azhar. Rest of the members are fine with the 'solidity' of the evidences against him.
My reading suggests that India is perfectly fine with the Pakistan and China defending Masood Azhar, Hafiz Saeed and Dawood Ibrahim as it gives India more ammo to corner and embarrass the friendly duo. Reminds me of Clive Lloyd dropping the catch of Geoffrey Boycott in 1979 world cup finals as the more he batted the more England was losing the chance to win.
I am curious to know about the criminal procedure laws of China. If a crime takes place in China do they wait and not arrest a suspect unless they have collected 'solid' evidences against him? And who decides if the evidences are solid or not? What solid evidence of terror act they have against Dalai Lama, Dolkun Isa and Rebiya Kadeer?

If India is "fine" with it, just as it is "fine" with not getting into the NSG, why is there this furor in India over these topics? Why is Modi pushing so hard to get into the NSG, hijacking summits by talking about Pakistan and Maulana Azhar?

There is outrage in the Indian media, in the Indian political apparatus over these developments. Deep frustrations towards China, and their soft power. India has adopted every aggressive ploy against China, but it has not worked in their favor. What can you guys do about it, instead of being in denial mode of being "fine" with things?

 

[shahbaz baig]

I guess Pakistani people are okay protecting terrorists like Masood Azhar while 100s of people die in Pakistan because of such elements.

Good logic, would you be ok if terrorists in your country use the same logic? did lal masjid mullah hold a gun and fire at the security forces? did mullah fazllullah personally accompany suicide bombers to pakistan and press the trigger?
Escaping with terrorists help wont make him a saint, it only reaffirms the fact he is a terrorist.

probably your next perverted logic would be that masood azhar does not how to pilot a plane so he is not responsible.


hypocritical double standards of the highest order. If he is not a terrorist why not a trial by a UN or international court.

what if pakistan demand from UN that hand over MODI to Pakistan because he is the terrorist of killing innocent people in Lahore Blast ??? will you hand over MODI to pak without taking solid evidence.. Thanks to God Pakistan and China knows what is Humanity