KS
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2010
- Messages
- 12,528
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
what's wrong hearing from both side and making a neutral stance??
There is nothing wrong in taking a neutral stance wen it comes to ppl...but wen it comes to terrorists there should not be a neutral stance.
There should be a single stance of eliminating these vermin.
The Naxals were once idealogically driven.But the Maoists today are just power hungry animals killing innocents.
And i ve come across many ppl saying govt is taking away Tribal lands.
Surely the tribals do not/should not own lands jus for the sake they r tribals.The land is GOI land and if mineral wealth is there it should be explioted w/o causing damage to the environment.
Of course the tribals should have special rights but they should not hold the Govt to hostage. and I find no wrong in the govt taking the lands provided they r given proper compensation.
p.s.: I myself have undergone this wen my anccestral land was taken for a fourlane road and im perfectly happy since the govt provided proper compensation.Similarly the tribals can claim compensation but CANNOT keep the govt hostage.