You are aware that RASP (the formal selection process) is considered easier than Ranger School right? Ranger school is the main selection program, the one that weeds out the poorly qualified candidates. RASP just makes sure you're ready for your first deployment and don't get killed as soon as you hit the ground. If they can pass Ranger School they can pass RASP and make Ranger.
it's the laws and regulations, not their physical abilities that are the deciding factor here.
And remember, BUD/s is considered to be hell too, and it's before SEAL training even starts. If selection percentages are anything to go by, BUD/s is more difficult that SEAL training, considering its massive washout rate:
http://archive.navytimes.com/news/2007/04/navy_sealrecruiting_training_070408w/
These pre-selection programs are designed to screen unworthy candidates while the selection programs further refine them, but not to radically.
Talk to her about it on Friday. I doubt Norway is hamstringing itself for the sake of political correctness. They don't have the resources or manpower to waste time with personnel that can't hack the requirements of their most elite units.
Here's an interesting counterpoint. Are Men going through the same program either? Or have standards been lowered for them too?
Why Are Standards Plummeting in the Ranger Assessment and Selection Program? | SOFREP
Just a thought.
In any event I'm not SOF, I don't know if I would have made the qualifications, but sub crews are put through a hell that few others are. I could be wrong, but I know women have passed SOF course. They've got just as much balls as we do.