What's new

NATO unveils master plan to defeat Russia in nuclear war, as Moscow says ‘confrontational’ playbook shows it was right to cut ties

Battlion25

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 18, 2021
Messages
2,972
Reaction score
-5
Country
Pakistan
Location
Malaysia
NATO unveils master plan to defeat Russia in nuclear war, as Moscow says ‘confrontational’ playbook shows it was right to cut ties

6172c85f203027058b549cdf.jpg



Top defense chiefs from NATO member states have given a green light to a new grand strategy on how to beat Russia in any potential all-out conflict, as Moscow says the move proves the US-led bloc isn’t open to improving relations.

On Thursday, ministers met in Brussels to sign off the scheme, named the “Concept for Deterrence and Defense in the Euro-Atlantic Area.”
According to NATO’s General Secretary, Jens Stoltenberg, it is part of efforts to “continue to strengthen our alliance with better and modernized plans.”

The bloc’s officials insist they don’t believe an attack is imminent, but that it is worthwhile being prepared in any case.As part of the plan, NATO troops would fight against Russia’s forces in both the Baltic Region and across the Black Sea.


The battle plans also focus on non-conventional warfare, including the use of nuclear weapons, cyber-attacks and even conflict in space. However, Kremlin Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov hit out at the adoption of the strategy on Friday, saying that it shows there is no prospect for turning around rock-bottom relations with the bloc.

“There is no need for dialogue under these conditions,” he argued, saying that the adoption “of such a concept by NATO confirms it once again.” According to him, “this alliance was not created for peace, it was conceived, designed and created for confrontation.”

Defending the measures, Stoltenberg told reporters earlier this week that the bloc welcomes US efforts “to really engage in meaningful, strategic talks with Russia” over the extension of the New START atomic weapons treaty, saying that “some important steps have been taken recently.”

However, he added, “the relationship between NATO and Russia is at its lowest, lowest point since the end of the Cold War, and the reason for that is the Russian behavior.”

“They have invaded the neighbors, they have annexed part of another country, they are investing heavily in new nuclear capabilities,”
the bloc’s top official claimed.


“They’re meddling in our democratic processes, and we have seen Russia being responsible for aggressive actions against NATO Allies.” Moscow, however, has sounded the alarm in recent days over a number of standoffs with US battleships and warplanes near its borders.

Earlier this week, two fighter jets were scrambled to escort a pair of American US B-1B strategic bombers over the Black Sea, just days after Russian sailors intercepted the USS Chafee as it set course for the waters of Peter the Great Bay, which Russia maintains is its sovereign territory.

Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova hit out at Stoltenberg’s comments on Thursday, saying that the NATO boss underestimates the scale of the problem in relations, and that ties between the two are actually even “in a state worse than at any point during the darkest days of the Cold War.”


Speaking to dignitaries in a speech at the Valdai Discussion Club on Thursday, Russian President Vladimir Putin accused the US of “opening the door” to Ukraine joining NATO with a recent trip by Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin to Kiev.

However, even without the Eastern European nation joining the bloc, he said, “the military development of the territory is already underway and this really poses a threat to the Russian Federation.”

“Tomorrow, rockets could appear near Kharkov, what are we going to do about it? It’s not us placing our missiles there, it’s them shoving theirs under our nose,”
Putin added.

 
.
I have said previously NATO will not fight in Taiwan Strait or anywhere in Asia due to logistics reason but will want to conquer from their main base in East Europe starting from Russia, spreading to China. This is their main theater they will not waste on other theaters example like the oceania one or Taiwan Strait.. They wanna sit in East europe wait until things get out hand to launch their WW3 campaign from there solely
 
.
I have said previously NATO will not fight in Taiwan Strait or anywhere in Asia due to logistics reason but will want to conquer from their main base in East Europe starting from Russia, spreading to China. This is their main theater they will not waste on other theaters example like the oceania one or Taiwan Strait.. They wanna sit in East europe wait until things get out hand to launch their WW3 campaign from there solely

They don't wanna confuse themselves by being allover the place instead want one main headquarters which is East Europe that is where the beast nests hence they will not take bait on other theaters or be drawn out into them as they will have logistical disadvantage hence they will have to travel a long distance it is not ideal but if you run thru Russia via East Europe you will be kissing the Chinese borders by default and that gives them a shortcut

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NATO not ready for equal dialogue, Russian defense minister says as German counterpart warns bloc ready to deter Moscow with nukes
23 Oct, 2021 15:28

6174192c85f54006050a9dfb.jpg





Security in Europe can only be collective, but NATO is not ready for equal dialogue, Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu has said. NATO earlier agreed on a master plan to deter Moscow, including with nuclear weapons.

German Defense Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer has been one of the most active backers of NATO's new master plan to counter Russia in case a military conflict breaks out between the sides. The strategy, which was agreed on Thursday, envisages the military alliance’s troops fighting Russian forces in the Baltic region and across the Black Sea, while also calling for non-conventional warfare, including nuclear weapons, cyber-attacks, and space military technology, to be employed.

“This is the way of deterrence,” Kramp-Karrenbauer told German radio Deutschlandfunk earlier this week, commenting on the idea of deploying nuclear weapons in the air above Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia to protect them from what NATO calls the “Russian threat.”


“We must make it very clear to Russia that we are ready to use such measures as well, so that it would have an early deterrent effect... This is being adapted to the current behavior of Russia,”
she insisted.

 
Last edited:
. . .
Nazis and Napoleon also prepared such master plans for Russia we all know how it ended up.
 
.
Good joke :) Napolean & Hitler also thought on similar lines..... Have you seen the size of russia? you think thats a shortcut?

I am not pro-NATO but just saying conventionally if they were to defeat Russia they will be on the Mongolian and Chinese borders that is just factual observation not saying any of it is happening
 
.
When will these fools realise that it is the other way around -- NATO should worry about Russia OVERRUNNING THEM IN MATTER OF HOURS AND DAYS - not even Weeks !! These douche bags have no idea what they are dealing with ! :omghaha:
Exactly .
Those US and NATO fags talk about nuclear war without knowing actually that's Russia's main strength and their weakness.Russia has the biggest nuclear stockpile in the world and recently with the introduction of hypersonic missiles one thing is sure that no air defence system in the world can stop Russian missile attack . And US and Europe doesn't have this hypersonic tech as we speak. Whole Europe and US will be a radioactive waste land for sure.
 
.
I am not pro-NATO but just saying conventionally if they were to defeat Russia they will be on the Mongolian and Chinese borders that is just factual observation not saying any of it is happening
Now that's exactly how Hitler's and his generals thought. Even conventionally it's impossible to defeat Russia , history is evident. Every attacking military gets sucked ,war gets prolonged then the harsh Russian winter comes ,the winter known for only sparing Russians and killing all invaders.
Invaders come to Russia at their own will later they beg Russia to let them go back :lol:
 
.
Now that's exactly how Hitler's and his generals thought. Even conventionally it's impossible to defeat Russia , history is evident. Every attacking military gets sucked ,war gets prolonged then the harsh Russian winter comes ,the winter known for only sparing Russians and killing all invaders.
Invaders come to Russia at their own will later they beg Russia to let them go back :lol:

Relax fella Russia is certainly not Divine they were defeated by the Mongols they can surely be defeated again just because they overcame Napoleon and Hitler doesn't mean they are invincible you over did your Russian stanning look anything can happen in the military sphere and Russia is beatable and if I had to put my money on anyone it would be NATO I would favor them but if you add China as an extra addition I would definitely favor China allied with Russia. China is 50 times stronger than Russia and Russia's population is also decreasing. China has logistical might, manpower, technology advantage
 
Last edited:
.
When will these fools realise that it is the other way around -- NATO should worry about Russia OVERRUNNING THEM IN MATTER OF HOURS AND DAYS - not even Weeks !! These douche bags have no idea what they are dealing with ! :omghaha:
This happens only in video games. Europe is much bigger than let's say Georgia. There are too many geographical features and NATO of-course.

And who will finance a military operation on said scale to begin with?

What happened in World War 2 cannot be replicated now.
 
.
When will these fools realise that it is the other way around -- NATO should worry about Russia OVERRUNNING THEM IN MATTER OF HOURS AND DAYS - not even Weeks !! These douche bags have no idea what they are dealing with ! :omghaha:
And you know better than them?
 
.
Exactly .
Those US and NATO fags talk about nuclear war without knowing actually that's Russia's main strength and their weakness.Russia has the biggest nuclear stockpile in the world and recently with the introduction of hypersonic missiles one thing is sure that no air defence system in the world can stop Russian missile attack . And US and Europe doesn't have this hypersonic tech as we speak. Whole Europe and US will be a radioactive waste land for sure.
Those at the helm of NATO defenses do not know what they are talking about? Funny assumption.

Russian nuclear forces are significant of-course. But WE do not know what type of battle plan NATO has conceptualized which has led to subject revelation and Russian boycott. Details will be classified.

Nuclear weapons do not operate outside the laws of physics. Rapid advances in technologies are making battle plans possible that were not possible before. Evolution, dear.

American C-HGB ICBM class hypersonic weapon system is technologically mature and most advanced design in the world. All they have to do is to open an ICBM and replace its RV with C-HGB. Game on then.

Anyways, I do not think NATO and Russia will fight a war anytime soon.
 
.
Relax fella Russia is certainly not Divine they were defeated by the Mongols they can surely be defeated again just because they overcame Napoleon and Hitler doesn't mean they are invincible you over did your Russian stanning look anything can happen in the military sphere and Russia is beatable and if I had to put my money on anyone it would be NATO I would favor them but if you add China as an extra addition I would definitely favor China allied with Russia. China is 50 times stronger than Russia and Russia's population is also decreasing. China has logistical might, manpower, technology advantage
Mongols were actually one of Russia's kind. As someone who lived in Russia can tell most asiatic looking Russians share their DNA with mongols. The more you move towards eastern Russia ,the more DNA gets stronger. Geography and climate wise they are hardly outsiders. And mongols were no doubt savage rare bad a$$ warriors . Comparing mongols with US/Europe is like apples vs oranges.
Those at the helm of NATO defenses do not know what they are talking about? Funny assumption.

Russian nuclear forces are significant of-course. But WE do not know what type of battle plan NATO has conceptualized which has led to subject revelation and Russian boycott. Details will be classified.

Nuclear weapons do not operate outside the laws of physics. Rapid advances in technologies are making battle plans possible that were not possible before. Evolution, dear.

American C-HGB ICBM class hypersonic weapon system is technologically mature and most advanced design in the world. All they have to do is to open an ICBM and replace its RV with C-HGB. Game on then.

Anyways, I do not think NATO and Russia will fight a war anytime soon.
Recently in April 2021 US has failed in the hypersonic missile test.
 
.
This happens only in video games. Europe is much bigger than let's say Georgia. There are too many geographical features and NATO of-course.

And who will finance a military operation on said scale to begin with?

What happened in World War 2 cannot be replicated now.

Mate, if they knew what they were talking about then IT WOULD NEVER BE IN THE MEDIA ! The reason it is in media is because those at the Helm DO NOT exactly know what Russia is upto. This being in the media is a SIGN OF WEAKNESS, not a sign of strength.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom