What's new

NATO targets 2014 handover of Afghan war to Kabul

Lankan Ranger

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
12,550
Reaction score
0
NATO targets 2014 handover of Afghan war to Kabul

US President Barack Obama and his NATO allies open a two-day summit on Friday to back a 2014 target for ceding control over the bogged-down Afghan war to Kabul.

After nine years of war provoked by Al-Qaeda's 9/11 attack, 2,200 troops killed among US-led forces, and now an open row with Kabul over tactics, NATO will deliver the closest thing yet to a withdrawal timetable.

Leaders, meeting at a complex of white steel, concrete and canvas-roofed buildings at the shores of the River Tejo, will be drawing up nothing less than the outlines of a new era for the 28-nation alliance.

Navigating a way out of the Afghan war, the biggest and longest military operation undertaken by NATO since its creation in 1949 to contain the Soviet Union, is the biggest challenge in Lisbon.

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen admitted on the eve of the summit that the alliance had made mistakes in waging the war, notably by waiting until last year to set up a training mission.

"I think, retrospectively, that we underestimated the challenge and our operation in Afghanistan didn't have sufficient resources, so in that respect, yes, it was a mistake," Rasmussen told Portuguese newspaper Expresso.

"Now we are on the right path and it is for that reason that I am quite optimistic about our operation in Afghanistan, and we will make this positive announcement in Lisbon, that the transition is ready to start," he said.

NATO officials insist that the transition is not a rush to the exit door, but the war is deeply unpopular in Europe and governments are under pressure from voters to bring soldiers home.

However, Obama still faces resistance from his own high command and from newly resurgent Republicans in Congress.

The Pentagon said on Thursday the plan to hand over security to Afghan forces in 2014 represents an "aspirational goal" and not a rigid deadline.

Press secretary Geoff Morrell said there "may very well be the need for (US-led) forces to remain in-country" beyond 2014, albeit in smaller numbers.

That echoed remarks on Wednesday by NATO's civilian representative in Afghanistan, Mark Sedwill.

The date was chosen by Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who shocked NATO allies this week by urging the United States to scale down military operations and criticising night raids on Afghan homes.

US Defence Secretary Robert Gates sought to play down any rift, saying on Tuesday that Karzai's comments reflected "the impatience of a country that's been at war for 30 years".

Karzai, who arrived in Lisbon late Thursday, was to meet with Obama and other Western leaders on the sidelines of the summit, which was being held under tight security.

Hundreds of police closed off and secured streets surrounding the complex. A frigate patrolled the river. Security forces looked down with binoculars from the city's Vasco da Gama Tower.

NATO targets 2014 handover of Afghan war to Kabul - Hindustan Times
 
. . .
3.jpg
 
. .
So the Taliban must have been defeated and AQ destroyed........so the world must be safe then.............

eeeeeeerrrrrrrrrr hold on, isn't Pakistan a front line state fighting this WoT. We have lost the most troops, over 3000 and over 35000 civilians.......are we at this meeting as well

Repeat of the 80s and 90s again then huh
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom