What's new

NATO says China presents ‘systemic’ challenges

mister nato, pull your head up from between uncle sam's thighs and open your eyes. you are nothing but a side kick for that old pervert that has given you a framework of systemic decay, your society is rotting away, most children are born out of wedlock, grow up without a parent, barely 35% of your population gets a decent college level education, no one in the world wants to buy your everyday goods, you have to beg your arch enemy Russia for oil and gas, prostitution is the mainstay of your economy for goodness sakes. so instead of clashing with China on behalf of that old pervert uncle sam, why don't you get off your starving high horse and actually LEARN from China. you don't have systemic challenge with China your own systemic decay itself is the challenge that you face.
 
.
In 1975 when the G7 was formed, its GDP was 70% of the entire world.
Today it is barely 40%.

So tell us how G7 nations intends to finance its US proposed initiatives or plans assuming that Germany, France and Italy agree.

Cash is KING.


:omghaha: :omghaha: :omghaha:

 
.
mister nato, pull your head up from between uncle sam's thighs and open your eyes. you are nothing but a side kick for that old pervert that has given you a framework of systemic decay, your society is rotting away, most children are born out of wedlock, grow up without a parent, barely 35% of your population gets a decent college level education, no one in the world wants to buy your everyday goods, you have to beg your arch enemy Russia for oil and gas, prostitution is the mainstay of your economy for goodness sakes. so instead of clashing with China on behalf of that old pervert uncle sam, why don't you get off your starving high horse and actually LEARN from China. you don't have systemic challenge with China your own systemic decay itself is the challenge that you face.
Nato is learning from CN if you dont know. CN even willing to kiss daddy Jap's face just for some cheap yen after JP massacred 6 million CNese in ww2, so why NATO can not do the same to JP-US ??

55aea7801f0445848320c60a953b6a8b.jpeg
 
.
No thank you we going to use it to kill you after all.

Also most of our stuffs are western made we leave the small insignificant one to other suppliers (mostly so we can reverse engineer it).
You say it's garbage? So how can it killed us? :rofl:

While profit from those sales for China is real :enjoy:
 
.
NATO is useless..

Only China vs US only.

Between NATO, there are massive conflict between Germany, Italy, France, UK with regards to China.

In Asia, south Korea hate Japan more than anything. If China ask south Korea for alliance for an invasion against Japan. They will not even hesitate.
Skoreans hate China most after Japan,public may be more anti china right now than anti japan ,the media in Korea is filled with anti china retort,it's likely the job of cia ,but still.
China aided west in imperialism of Asia by supporting US against Japan,so will Korea & Japan do the same?
Depends on their interest; china has to offer a solution to semiconductor dependency to the US , as well as the alternative to dollar lynchpin,otherwise SK is tightly controlled by US .
 
.
You say it's garbage? So how can it killed us? :rofl:

Don't ask You're the one that's going to be killed by the garbage,

Besides you see the new FREMM we will be getting (thanks to your money) it will be superior to what china have or will have in the future. Not to mention destroyers or dare I say CV we will be getting thanks to china stupidity in arming a potential enemy.
 
. .
Don't ask You're the one that's going to be killed by the garbage,

Besides you see the new FREMM we will be getting (thanks to your money) it will be superior to what china have or will have in the future. Not to mention destroyers or dare I say CV we will be getting thanks to china stupidity in arming a potential enemy.

Yeah. Meh. FREMM is no match for 055.

 
. .
Yeah. Meh. FREMM is no match for 055.


You mean that Ghetto destroyer with the interior & electronic looking like it straight from the 80s?

FREMM is currently one the most advanced frigates in the market with even the US buying it for their Constellation class. There's a reason why nobody is lining up to buy chinese ships/toys if they can afford better.
 
. .
You mean that Ghetto destroyer with the interior & electronic looking like it straight from the 80s?

FREMM is currently one the most advanced frigates in the market with even the US buying it for their Constellation class. There's a reason why nobody is lining up to buy chinese ships/toys if they can afford better.

055 outdated? Meh. Nah. Hell, not even America's latest Arleigh Burke Flight III that was just launched can go toe to toe with 055.

 
.
The difference between UK and EU at G7 is so intense over so many issue including Northern Ireland and BREXIT that the organiser was instructed to shut off the Wi-Fi so that Russia and China don't get the wind of the heated arguments.

So UK may have to abort the BREXIT 11th hour deal and left with NO deal.

With France President Emmanuel Macron telling UK PM Boris Johnson that Northern Ireland is NOT a part of UK.

How ironic?

:coffee:

So in conclusion a made believe solidarity between USA, UK and Germany, France and Italy. The communique said it all.

Xinjiang, Taiwan strait were mentioned once each.
 
.
NATO is irrelevant and long overdue for dismantling for the sake of peace and harmony in Europe and the world.

Right now, it is just a postwar II instrument created during the cold war and continue to be used by a hegemonic USA to maintain their US supremacy.
NATO is the best ever created military alliance. it will remain for the foreseeable future. It provides peace and security for Western Hemisphere over 7 decades. Only delusional losers have the dream the Nato is irrelevant.
The PLA is aggressive it’s Ok for the Nato to look East.
 
.
NATO is the best ever created military alliance. it will remain for the foreseeable future. It provides peace and security for Western Hemisphere over 7 decades. Only delusional losers have the dream the Nato is irrelevant.
The PLA is aggressive it’s Ok for the Nato to look East.
Except it isn't looking at the East, it's only concern is Europe. It's called North Atlantic Alliance
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom