What's new

NATO MILITARY POWER 2019 (1000 Warships, 5000 Fighter Jets, 25.000 Airplanes)

He is a Hinduwadi high on Coca-Cola licking the balls of their masters for nothing. Its nothing to do with comprehension.
I am A Catholic

And I reported You Counter me with Facts Not illogical Rants

Please Show me how Turkey Superior To France,Germany Or UK Militarily
 
. . .
I am A Catholic

And I reported You Counter me with Facts Not illogical Rants

Please Show me how Turkey Superior To France,Germany Or UK Militarily

I am not addressing you! Do not quote me further and do what you like.
 
.
are u kidding us ?

do you know what about GDP PPP ?

according to IMF Turkey has $2.257 trillion of GDP PPP and Italy has $2.244 trillion of GDP PPP

Largest Means nothing
Even Iraq had 1 million Strong Army

Nato defeated it in a matter 3-4 days

They are qualitatively Way ahead in terms technology And Fire Power
Some times I even Question Why they lower ranked than india in GFP index

Any genuine Military Expert on PDF Will confirm it

Iraq was full of shit ..... and the US backed traitor KESNIZANI which was similar to FETO in Turkey destroyed Iraqi Armed Forces from inside

and NATO member Turkey is not Iraq

btw Turkish Army has better technology and firepower than any country in NATO except the US Army

only Turkish UCAVs are enough to destroy tiny European Armies
and Turkish Airforce has everything ... only problem is F35 issue with the US

and Turkish Navy has more firepower than Italian and German Navies ... only problem is F35 issue with the US

Please Show me how Turkey Superior To France,Germany Or UK Militarily

only watch .. I am saying again Turkish Army is stronger than French+British+German Armies combined
 
Last edited:
.
do you know what about GDP PPP ?

according to IMF Turkey has $2.257 trillion of GDP PPP and Italy has $2.244 trillion of GDP PPP



Iraq was full of shit ..... and the US backed traitor KESNIZANI which was similar to FETO in Turkey destroyed Iraqi Armed Forces from inside

and NATO member Turkey is not Iraq

btw Turkish Army has better technology and firepower than any country in NATO except the US Army

only Turkish UCAVs are enough to destroy tiny European Armies
and Turkish Airforce has everything ... only problem is F35 issue with the US

and Turkish Navy has more firefire than Italian and German Navies ... only problem is F35 issue with the US



only watch
Turkish and Pakistani soldiers are best in the world.
 
. .
of course bro

noob European soldiers are training .. they dont know what about fighting
on the other hand Turkish and Pakistani soldiers are fighting for decades
............................................
 
.
Largest Means nothing
Even Iraq had 1 million Strong Army

Nato defeated it in a matter 3-4 days

They are qualitatively Way ahead in terms technology And Fire Power
Some times I even Question Why they lower ranked than india in GFP index

Any genuine Military Expert on PDF Will confirm it

Well then
Largest Means nothing
Even Iraq had 1 million Strong Army

Nato defeated it in a matter 3-4 days

They are qualitatively Way ahead in terms technology And Fire Power
Some times I even Question Why they lower ranked than india in GFP index

Any genuine Military Expert on PDF Will confirm it

So u think NATO would include just a weak and large army? Have u heard of anything called NATO standards? NATO relies on interoperability and maintaining certain standards, they have similar weapons. They train together regularly. They wouldve been operating F35s if they didnt had issues with US.
Any genuine military expert would also confirm GFP ranking is BS.
 
.
So u think NATO would include just a weak and large army? Have u heard of anything called NATO standards? NATO relies on interoperability and maintaining certain standards, they have similar weapons. They train together regularly. They wouldve been operating F35s if they didnt had issues with US.
Any genuine military expert would also confirm GFP ranking is BS.
France Hardly use US weapons which biggest logistic supplier

STANAG agreement only cover shared logistics Which basically done to increase compatibility in Operations

That doesn't change Each Nato country Free to carry its own independent policy as a Free nation
Such has EU Which not includes US & Turkey
Which has its Own standardization of independent Defense industry
And jointly Own Firms Like Airbus ,Eurojet,Leonardo SPA etc

France And UK pretty much independent when it comes To there National objectives Look at Brexit

Both are independently carried out Nuclear Tests And research
They both operate SSBN Fleets
Specially France Which has Its own SLBM's And its own Fighter aircraft
 
.
France Hardly use US weapons which biggest logistic supplier

STANAG agreement only cover shared logistics Which basically done to increase compatibility in Operations

That doesn't change Each Nato country Free to carry its own independent policy as a Free nation
Such has EU Which not includes US & Turkey
Which has its Own standardization of independent Defense industry
And jointly Own Firms Like Airbus ,Eurojet,Leonardo SPA etc

France And UK pretty much independent when it comes To there National objectives Look at Brexit

Both are independently carried out Nuclear Tests And research
They both operate SSBN Fleets
Specially France Which has Its own SLBM's And its own Fighter aircraft

When did i say UK or france were weak? But that doesnt mean Turkey is like large iraqi or north korean army. In NATO they are 2nd largest, doesnt necessarily means better than UK and france but also doesnt mean its just weak inflated army, which u are suggesting. Remove Turkey and US and NATO will loose more than 70℅ of its overall power. Seriously indians just try to justify their every "bongi" as we call it. No wonder...
 
.
NATO is strategically and militarily united, but NATO is not ideologically united ANYMORE. This happened within the past year, when the EU president told US in a meeting that EU wont join US in a confrontation with CHina, so that means, US is on its own militarily. Another example of this was the fact that NATO couldnt muster a coalition to patrol the Persian Gulf to deter Iran recently. Only 2-3 NATO countries formed their own coalition. NATO is now essentially Tiger with "one tooth".
 
.
Yes NATO is very powerful so powerful that when Russia took Crimea they announced 4 weeks of exercises

then when they took Eastern Ukraine they announced more sanctions and more exercises this time 6 weeks

so basically they have no problem even of Russia takes over France then they will do 8 week exercises
 
.
President Putin said it before, Russia can strangle NATO.
 
.
NATO is crumbling every year since the end of the cold war. As America culturally becomes more latinized and Europe more
NATO is strategically and militarily united, but NATO is not ideologically united ANYMORE. This happened within the past year, when the EU president told US in a meeting that EU wont join US in a confrontation with CHina, so that means, US is on its own militarily. Another example of this was the fact that NATO couldnt muster a coalition to patrol the Persian Gulf to deter Iran recently. Only 2-3 NATO countries formed their own coalition. NATO is now essentially Tiger with "one tooth".
Superpowers are never defeated and conquered militarily e.g Roman Empire, Tang Dynasty etc. They always fall due to the rot in their core which grows until they annhilate themselves.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom