What's new

'NATO behind spread of radical Islam'

fd24

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 23, 2011
Messages
5,864
Reaction score
0
The Arab spring could turn into a fiery Arab summer as a result of NATO actions, the Russian envoy to the alliance says.

*“NATO’s political and military interference in the Arab spring may bring about a ‘hot Arab summer’, with a whole range of consequences for neighboring regions,” Dmitry Rogozin told Interfax ahead of Thursday’s Russia-NATO Council ministerial meeting.

He added that as a result of NATO’s interference, “Sharia law is coming to previously relatively secular states”.

At the December 8 meeting in Brussels, Russia wants to find out “to what extent NATO is aware of the fact that the coming of radical Islam to all the regions where it ‘projected its force’ is a result of its actions”, the envoy insisted.

The diplomat went on to say that during the military operation in Libya, the NATO-led international coalition “revamped” the relevant UN Security Council resolution.

"It said: no bombing – and they were bombing. It said: no arms deliveries to any party – and they were delivering arms. It said: no land operation – and they conducted special forces operations. It said: do not intervene in the domestic political situation – and they changed it,” Rogozin stressed.

The Russian envoy to NATO also pointed out that Moscow “insists on confirming the basic principles of international law” and wants NATO to “return to the legal field and recognize its subordinate role to the United Nations”.

Well done Nato - Thank you for opening the door for assisting in the spreading of radical Islam!


'NATO behind spread of radical Islam' — RT
 
.
Well done Nato - Thank you for opening the door for assisting in the spreading of radical Islam!
You are welcome. Am sure you are quite glad about this unintended consequence. As if as a muslim you believe in secularism any way.
 
.
unintended consequences? More like NATO not giving a dam about the consequences of their actions. How hard is it to foresee the negative consequences of bombing the crap out of soverign countries and governments?
 
.
You are welcome. Am sure you are quite glad about this unintended consequence. As if as a muslim you believe in secularism any way.

What i believe Gambit is you have been responsible for the unjustifiable death of thousands of innocent muslims. You enter a nation (or several nations) with submissions of lies and deceit and rape and steal the nations wealth and then you fail to see the satire in my post? Stop blindly following the lying zionistic scumbag government of yours and at least attempt to show some self respect. Look at the sea of destruction you leave behind? Dont you feel slightly embarrassed by your nations actions? AND to cap it all off you have now got your troops to blow up animals just for fun? What kind of legacy are you leaving these countries - bullies.
BTW - Happy new year Gambit
 
.
Its a very late discovery and its still not being done by Americans/NATO itself. But I am glad somebody from USA is finally acknowledging it instead of calling it a myth or conspiracy.
 
.
It was very well planned and calculated decision. They have to make sure that it these states are ruled by so called islamist parties and they will try to impose laws there .(I am very happy abt it that Laws are going to be Islamic) but there is a negative side to it .

Israel will declare all of them as a threat and will invade them .Killing millions and million in it way.They will declare a "Greater Israel".

I think this is what it is .................. i will be super happy if i am proved wrong and these countried are not invaded by Zionists.
 
. .
It was very well planned and calculated decision. They have to make sure that it these states are ruled by so called islamist parties and they will try to impose laws there .(I am very happy abt it that Laws are going to be Islamic) but there is a negative side to it .

Israel will declare all of them as a threat and will invade them .Killing millions and million in it way.They will declare a "Greater Israel".

I think this is what it is .................. i will be super happy if i am proved wrong and these countried are not invaded by Zionists.

My issue is that USA and NATO have entered countries with no interest in the people or the consequences. Their pretense that it is humanitarian is nonsense - it is to stabilize their own needs and to destabilize anyone not "wanting to play ball".
If whilst doing this they leave behind a trail of destruction or relight radical Islam - they dont care. It will give them reason ti venture in again whenever they want. They have carried out these activities and left their own nation on the brink of bankruptcy - was it really worth it?

By the way brother your theory about Israel wont come true - when the USA run out of $$ so will Israel.
 
.
What is radical Islam?Are Maududi and Gazi Ilm Ud Din Shaheed considered radicals? Is Karzai considered more radical than Taliban? Why did many Pakistanis support Taliban even BEFORE America started bombing Pakistan? Did America bomb Iran and Saudi?

Is there selection bias in the theory? We know correltion does not prove causation, don't we?
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom