Nationalists and Populists Poised to Dominate European Balloting

[MarkusS]

Why are all the European far rights so pro-Russian?

Im neutral towards russia and i consider myself far right

 

[AUz]

Rich coming from a guy whose country is known only for producing terrorism and child rape .

Lol, you can soothe your soul by saying bullsh!t like this--but that doesn't change the fact that your own peoples (Europeans) regard you as gypsies and easy meat (in terms of woman). Pakistan isn't famous for child rape or terrorism. It's Catholic church that's famous worldwide for child rape. Ask any random person to associate child rape with an international "entity"--boom, Catholic church comes to mind. And you know it too

Yes, Pakistan is known as the victim of terrorism (A country which is unstable and where attack happens). I admit, not a good image. But we have fought back and survived Mashallah. Our cities have become safe, and our forces have now conquered every single inch of major territorial bases used by insurgents. Deaths from terrorism in Pakistan were lowest in a decade in 2015, and this year is even lower uptil now (with barely two months remaining)!! So violence has been defeated and normalcy has arrived since couple of years now (Mashallah to that!).

(Lots of political happenings though--another political storm coming in capital this coming November! )

Despite your rants,you don't matter,nobody sits with you at any table,you're isolated and considered a 3rd world black hole and to make up for you inferiority complex you find comfort in these rants.It's no use educating you like I did many times so I'll leave you believe that a nation of illiterates,who,btw,has a budget (aka money in the country's pockets) 40% SMALLER than tiny Romania but has to feed 9x times the people, is considered of any value on the world stage.

LOL, rants is what you and poor @MarkusS do. Sad, hopeless rants...while your own lands go towards 25% being "foreign" in next 20, 30 years (In UK for example, quarter of kids are already "from non-white background"). Nobody sits with Pakistan? Pakistan is the key player in one of the most major conflict in the world since past decade, and has played an absolute central role in bringing one party of conflict (Taliban) to the table. Pakistan has been playing an independent, self-serving direct role in major conflicts of the world for past couple of decades (whether it was Soviet invasion or current Afghan war). Hell, our military played a direct role in a European conflict by airlifting weapons to Bosnian Muslims during Yugoslavia conflict. Again, we weren't "coalition" partner of the U.S nor we were allowed to interfere. But we did it anyways (International Court even summoned one of our Brigadier for it. No hoots given, though!)

What "influence" and power Italy has? Nothing!

It's not even a regional power, and/or has ANY role beyond its borders. Nothing. It's military power and capabilities is league behind that of India, Pakistan, Turkey, China, Britain, France, and so on. At best, Italians might provide few soldiers as "coalition" forces when the U.S enters some wars--but then again, even tiny Croatia does that.

And please, don't bring "living standards" or HDI comparison in the picture and make a fool out of yourself. HDI comparisons is for losers like you. Switzerland has better HDI and living standards than Russia. Guess what? History doesnt even piss on Switzerland--they are irrelevant. Qatar is TWICE as rich as United States based on per caita income---guess what? Nobody cares.

In International system, only and only one variable matters---and that is Power.

(There is a whole debate as to what constitutes power in International system and so on. I wont go there because for a working class, under-educated Romanian lad like you, it'll be too much of an argument. However, hard military power is a good measure to start. Why are USA, Russia, China, India, UK, France, Pakistan, considered so powerful? Yup, all of them are viable military nuclear states and militarily far more powerful than any other state out there (non-nuclear exceptions of Japan, Turkey etc exist) (Also. within these states, some are vastly more powerful (US) while some are comparatively weaker (India, Pakistan, France, UK wrt to Russia/US). However, on a hypothetical battlefield, the above mentioned countries can wreck havoc on any other country of the world by deploying much larger forces with far more powerful weapon systems. That's what hard power means..)

Guess who's more powerful, and hence more relevant to history in the making and today's International system? Romania? Italy? or a full-fledged, mainstream nuclear nation-state on path to having 300 million+ peoples with deep alliances with the most powerful actors in the world (United States, China, Saudi Arabia etc).

Pakistan is far more powerful than all of Europe except UK and France (and Germany, but Germans have locked themselves down and haven't developed their hard power to the extent they are capable of. Same goes for Japanese).

Yes, Pakistan is a middle-income nation and not high-income one---but a mere 3.5% growth for next 35 years straight will push Pakistan way up into high-income category---and 3.5% is when we were at our "worst"--we are currently in our "recovering" phase, and already growing near 5%. So rest assured, unless something absolutely unexpected happens in Pakistan...We will become an high-income economic sphere.

But would punny, irrelevant European states like Romania, Italy etc be able to match Pakistan in terms of the actual measure of relevance--Hard Power? Not a chance!

Hell, even Norway, if choses to, can take a jib at China for its poverty, lack of opportunities that average norway citizen has, and HDI---but does it matter?

We should off course improve the living conditions for our citizens (which we are, near 5% growth, massive infrastructural projects being built, CPEC going full steam, our youth literacy rates above 80% now, and so on)---but as I said, that's our domestic problem. In the grand scheme of things, it's a nation-state's power that matters. Hence, middle-income/developing states India, Pakistan, China, Russia etc would always be more relevant to humanity than "better developed" Romania, Switzerland, Italy, Qatar, UAE, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and what not...

Decent living standards is something that's almost inevitable everywhere in the world in coming decades outside of sub-Saharan Africa (which will take more time, according to UN Development Program's report). However, having a massively powerful and well oiled military machine with nuclear strategic forces and having immense hard power is not-so inevitable for 95% of the world and 95% of what you call "the West"...

Other than playing a more active/influential role in major world events/conflicts, Pakistan also holds far superior military than anything Italy can put in the battle field right now. And with all the current projects, the difference is only growing between the us and small Italians. Moreover, due to demographics, location, manpower, and resources---Pakistan is destined to be a much bigger economy than Italy. Pakistan just surpassed $1 trillion mark this year in terms of GDP based on purchasing power, and with 4% to 5% growth compared with Italy's 0.4% growth--Pakistan will surely be a bigger economic power in coming decades (as IMF projects).

Google "Fissile Material Cutt-off Treaty" (FMCT)--it is one of the most crucial treaty being pushed by world's major nuclear powers---and Pakistan is the only country blocking it (That's the Pakistan's position on big boy's table). We will soon sign it though (Since we have already built what we wanted to build before signing the treaty)

But offcourse, nobody sits with Pakistan and Italy is the god of the world according to poor, white-nationalist losers here..

You do know that Italy is a technological powerhouse

Yes, so is Malaysia, South Korea, Switzerland, and so many more.

Read my post in full and you'll have a better understanding of the world around you.

Denmark is FAR more technologically advanced than Russia and india--guess who's more relevant to history and humanity?

Nuclear powers with massive military prowess and very important International alliances---or a tiny country's cool technology and green windmills?

 

[Deliorman]

Why are all the European far rights so pro-Russian?

Maybe because of the fact that most far- right parties (and also far- left ones) are being financed and helped by Russia and people who are loyal to it (a big part of them since the times before the break up of the Soviet Union). All medias connected to them, their supporters are a useful tool for the hybrid war Russia is waging against the Western world ever since they invaded Ukraine. Those political parties are mostly supported by the dumbest and laziest members of society. For these people Russia is a role model:
- A country where the traditional family and religious christian values are respected (even though the country is one of the biggest exporters of pornography, child pornography and prostitutes in the world. Even though the country is with one of the highest rates of alcoholism and drug addiction in the world, not the mention the high divorce rates, suicide rates, homicide rates, the highest number of HIV infected people in Europe and so on.).
- A country that is strong and keeping the Muslim invaders away from it's borders- not like Gay-Europe! ( Even though Russia is having the biggest Muslim population in whole Europe. Even though the biggest mosque in Europe was opened in Moscow a couple of years ago to serve the millions of Muslims living there. Even though the highest number of European fighters for ISIS in the Middle East are from Russia and etc...).
- A country that will save the world from the evil Americans/Jews/Illuminati that brainwash our kids with their Western values. (Even though Russia is one of the countries with the biggest Jewish populations in the world. A country where a lot of the country's richest and most powerful people are Jewish. O yeah and let's not forget the fact that the kids of most Russian politicians and oligarchs live or study in the West. A lot of them own properties and bank accounts there etc. ).
- And more and more...

 

[Echo_419]

Lol, you can soothe your soul by saying bullsh!t like this--but that doesn't change the fact that your own peoples (Europeans) regard you as gypsies and easy meat (in terms of woman). Pakistan isn't famous for child rape or terrorism. It's Catholic church that's famous worldwide for child rape. Ask any random person to associate child rape with an international "entity"--boom, Catholic church comes to mind. And you know it too

Yes, Pakistan is known as the victim of terrorism (A country which is unstable and where attack happens). I admit, not a good image. But we have fought back and survived Mashallah. Our cities have become safe, and our forces have now conquered every single inch of major territorial bases used by insurgents. Deaths from terrorism in Pakistan were lowest in a decade in 2015, and this year is even lower uptil now (with barely two months remaining)!! So violence has been defeated and normalcy has arrived since couple of years now (Mashallah to that!).

(Lots of political happenings though--another political storm coming in capital this coming November! )



LOL, rants is what you and poor @MarkusS do. Sad, hopeless rants...while your own lands go towards 25% being "foreign" in next 20, 30 years (In UK for example, quarter of kids are already "from non-white background"). Nobody sits with Pakistan? Pakistan is the key player in one of the most major conflict in the world since past decade, and has played an absolute central role in bringing one party of conflict (Taliban) to the table. Pakistan has been playing an independent, self-serving direct role in major conflicts of the world for past couple of decades (whether it was Soviet invasion or current Afghan war). Hell, our military played a direct role in a European conflict by airlifting weapons to Bosnian Muslims during Yugoslavia conflict. Again, we weren't "coalition" partner of the U.S nor we were allowed to interfere. But we did it anyways (International Court even summoned one of our Brigadier for it. No hoots given, though!)

What "influence" and power Italy has? Nothing!

It's not even a regional power, and/or has ANY role beyond its borders. Nothing. It's military power and capabilities is league behind that of India, Pakistan, Turkey, China, Britain, France, and so on. At best, Italians might provide few soldiers as "coalition" forces when the U.S enters some wars--but then again, even tiny Croatia does that.

And please, don't bring "living standards" or HDI comparison in the picture and make a fool out of yourself. HDI comparisons is for losers like you. Switzerland has better HDI and living standards than Russia. Guess what? History doesnt even piss on Switzerland--they are irrelevant. Qatar is TWICE as rich as United States based on per caita income---guess what? Nobody cares.

In International system, only and only one variable matters---and that is Power.

(There is a whole debate as to what constitutes power in International system and so on. I wont go there because for a working class, under-educated Romanian lad like you, it'll be too much of an argument. However, hard military power is a good measure to start. Why are USA, Russia, China, India, UK, France, Pakistan, considered so powerful? Yup, all of them are viable military nuclear states and militarily far more powerful than any other state out there (non-nuclear exceptions of Japan, Turkey etc exist) (Also. within these states, some are vastly more powerful (US) while some are comparatively weaker (India, Pakistan, France, UK wrt to Russia/US). However, on a hypothetical battlefield, the above mentioned countries can wreck havoc on any other country of the world by deploying much larger forces with far more powerful weapon systems. That's what hard power means..)

Guess who's more powerful, and hence more relevant to history in the making and today's International system? Romania? Italy? or a full-fledged, mainstream nuclear nation-state on path to having 300 million+ peoples with deep alliances with the most powerful actors in the world (United States, China, Saudi Arabia etc).

Pakistan is far more powerful than all of Europe except UK and France (and Germany, but Germans have locked themselves down and haven't developed their hard power to the extent they are capable of. Same goes for Japanese).

Yes, Pakistan is a middle-income nation and not high-income one---but a mere 3.5% growth for next 35 years straight will push Pakistan way up into high-income category---and 3.5% is when we were at our "worst"--we are currently in our "recovering" phase, and already growing near 5%. So rest assured, unless something absolutely unexpected happens in Pakistan...We will become an high-income economic sphere.

But would punny, irrelevant European states like Romania, Italy etc be able to match Pakistan in terms of the actual measure of relevance--Hard Power? Not a chance!

Hell, even Norway, if choses to, can take a jib at China for its poverty, lack of opportunities that average norway citizen has, and HDI---but does it matter?

We should off course improve the living conditions for our citizens (which we are, near 5% growth, massive infrastructural projects being built, CPEC going full steam, our youth literacy rates above 80% now, and so on)---but as I said, that's our domestic problem. In the grand scheme of things, it's a nation-state's power that matters. Hence, middle-income/developing states India, Pakistan, China, Russia etc would always be more relevant to humanity than "better developed" Romania, Switzerland, Italy, Qatar, UAE, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and what not...

Decent living standards is something that's almost inevitable everywhere in the world in coming decades outside of sub-Saharan Africa (which will take more time, according to UN Development Program's report). However, having a massively powerful and well oiled military machine with nuclear strategic forces and having immense hard power is not-so inevitable for 95% of the world and 95% of what you call "the West"...

Other than playing a more active/influential role in major world events/conflicts, Pakistan also holds far superior military than anything Italy can put in the battle field right now. And with all the current projects, the difference is only growing between the us and small Italians. Moreover, due to demographics, location, manpower, and resources---Pakistan is destined to be a much bigger economy than Italy. Pakistan just surpassed $1 trillion mark this year in terms of GDP based on purchasing power, and with 4% to 5% growth compared with Italy's 0.4% growth--Pakistan will surely be a bigger economic power in coming decades (as IMF projects).

Google "Fissile Material Cutt-off Treaty" (FMCT)--it is one of the most crucial treaty being pushed by world's major nuclear powers---and Pakistan is the only country blocking it (That's the Pakistan's position on big boy's table). We will soon sign it though (Since we have already built what we wanted to build before signing the treaty)

But offcourse, nobody sits with Pakistan and Italy is the god of the world according to poor, white-nationalist losers here..



Yes, so is Malaysia, South Korea, Switzerland, and so many more.

Read my post in full and you'll have a better understanding of the world around you.

Denmark is FAR more technologically advanced than Russia and india--guess who's more relevant to history and humanity?

Nuclear powers with massive military prowess and very important International alliances---or a tiny country's cool technology and green windmills?

Denmark is not more technologically advanced than India or Russia

 

[vostok]

@AUz Romania is Orthodox country, not Catholic.

 

[AUz]

@AUz Romania is Orthodox country, not Catholic.

I know that. However, what I said about association of child rape with Catholic Church stands true.

 

[WaLeEdK2]

They put it on themselves.