National Air Defense Command (NADCOM) - Updates & Discussions.

[Ibn Batouta]

i said LOW ALTITUDE PERFORMANCE, Because this our prime interceptor to engage Indian Brahmos Missiles

Ok, and for fighters interception, you are satisfied ? Especially SU-30 MKI, it will be effective in your opinion againt such russian fighters ?
The problem is if it is not effective in low altitude, it will be worst in medium altitude.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Ok, and for fighters interception, you are satisfied ? Especially SU-30 MKI, it will be effective in your opinion againt such russian fighters ?
The problem is if it is not effective in low altitude, it will be worst in medium altitude.

No high altitude performance is fine because there is no ground clutter to be found and Su-30MKI has a very large RCS

 

[Ibn Batouta]

No high altitude performance is fine because there is no ground clutter to be found and Su-30MKI has a very large RCS

Nice. I think we conclude the same feedback in Morocco on low altitude effectiveness, months ago we command 4 bataillon of French MICA VL Air Defence Systems, probably much more effective to counter Low altitude threats ( cruise missile ...)
Chinese SAM will be probably reserved for medium and hight altitude targets such as fighters.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Nice. I think we conclude the same feedback in Morocco on low altitude effectiveness, months ago we command 4 bataillon of French MICA VL Air Defence Systems, probably much more effective to counter Low altitude threats ( cruise missile ...)
Chinese SAM will be probably reserved for medium and hight altitude targets such as fighters.

Basically Chinese SAMs using 1 AESA/PESA to do all functions (detecting/Tracking/Engaging) all threats unlike most of Russian/EU SAMs that uses multiple radars ( one dedicated radar) to detect/track engage LOW ALTITUDE THREATS

 

[Ibn Batouta]

Basically Chinese SAMs using 1 AESA/PESA to do all functions (detecting/Tracking/Engaging) all threats unlike most of Russian/EU SAMs that uses multiple radars ( one dedicated radar) to detect/track engage LOW ALTITUDE THREATS

Yes 1 radar to do all this missions, but in Morocco for example, we have the COBRA Air Defense Center, for example western radar systems can work together with chinese radar system. We have US/French/Chinese/Russian SAM's, and they work together in a common AD System covering all Morocco. It is more effective and faster to deal with aerial threaths..

 

[Ultima Thule]

Yes 1 radar to do all this missions, but in Morocco for example, we have the COBRA Air Defense Center, for example western radar systems can work together with chinese radar system. We have US/French/Chinese/Russian SAM's, and they work together in a common AD System covering all Morocco. It is more effective and faster to deal with aerial threaths..

AD or early warning radars can't guides interceptor/SAMs bro its a Job of dedicated SAMs FIRE CONTROL RADAR, and we have similar net centric center for managing our airspace

 

[Ibn Batouta]

AD or early warning radars can't guides interceptor/SAMs bro its a Job of dedicated SAMs FIRE CONTROL RADAR, and we have similar net centric center for managing our airspace

Its not a problem, even western systems like MICA VL use only one radar for detection/tracking/engaging. The most important is that your territory is covered with radar effectively, and your AD teams are in good training condition with experience, and an effective central AD system that include all your data (radar, ships, fighters...)

 

[Ultima Thule]

Its not a problem, even western systems like MICA VL use only one radar for detection/tracking/engaging. The most important is that your territory is covered with radar effectively, and your AD teams are in good training condition with experience, and an effective central AD system that include all your data (radar, ships, fighters...)

Main things is guiding the interceptors, if you 2-3 SAMs (HQ-16) so their is a Chance, and AD/AWACS/SHIPS Fighters can only detect and track and may be gives the information to SAMs (HQ-16) but guiding a SAMs/interceptor is a main job of SAMs's FIRE CONTROL RADAR, if SAM (HQ-16) AESA/PESA will not able to detect/tack LOW ALTITUDE THREATS so how can you assume it able to intercept LOW ALTITUDE THREATS without DEDICATED RADAR for detecting LOW ALTITUDE TARGETS

 

[Ibn Batouta]

Main things is guiding the interceptors, if you 2-3 SAMs (HQ-16) so their is a Chance, and AD/AWACS/SHIPS Fighters can only detect and track and may be gives the information to SAMs (HQ-16) but guiding a SAMs/interceptor is a main job of SAMs's FIRE CONTROL RADAR, if SAM (HQ-16) AESA/PESA will not able to detect/tack LOW ALTITUDE THREATS so how can you assume it able to intercept LOW ALTITUDE THREATS without DEDICATED RADAR for detecting LOW ALTITUDE TARGETS

Along with the IBIS 150 3D radar we also have the IBIS 80 Low Altitude Radar , working with SD50 SAM and also AF902.
In Pakistan you have the IBIS 150 , and also the IBIS 80 ?

 

[Zarvan]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1280817316213796866

 

[Pakistani Fighter]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1280817316213796866

Is he @Tipu7 ?

 

[Zarvan]

Is he @Tipu7 ?

Yes he is

 

[mingle]

Yes he is

Which panstir PA procured and how many copies??

 

[Zarvan]

Which panstir PA procured and how many copies??

Which version is it that is still not known.

 

[skyshadow]

could Pakistan get a Air defense system more powerful then S-500 ? yes it can new the new version of Iran Bavar-373 ( Baver-474 ) will be more powerful then S-500 it self.