What's new

National Air Defense Command (NADCOM) - Updates & Discussions.

. .
The reason is that no one gives a shyt about what you have in this topic.

U did give a shyte sir.
Plus i was feeling happy for pakistanis as we have a similar system so no need for us to match u guys there.No need to make it a big issue sire
 
. .
Specs are 15km altitude and 40km range

So MR-SAM or LR-SAM?

Also these can or cannot be fitted into F-22P?
 
. . .
Specs are 15km altitude and 40km range

So MR-SAM or LR-SAM?

Also these can or cannot be fitted into F-22P?

MR-SAM.. along the same lines(because it is a purchased/reverse engineered/modified) Buk Missile that forms the basis for the HQ-16.

While this version is canisterized and may have naval potential, so far there is no inkling of a naval version. Again, its possible that somewhere in Zhuhai there are models or brochures that outline Naval version of various Chinese SAM systems but as we dont know.. well.. we dont know.
 
.
MR-SAM.. along the same lines(because it is a purchased/reverse engineered/modified) Buk Missile that forms the basis for the HQ-16.

While this version is canisterized and may have naval potential, so far there is no inkling of a naval version. Again, its possible that somewhere in Zhuhai there are models or brochures that outline Naval version of various Chinese SAM systems but as we dont know.. well.. we dont know.

It is fine to have short to medium range coverage, but didn't spada provide that pretty well? 40km is more like short range not medium, considering long range is 100km+ S200/300/400 etc
 
.
It is fine to have short to medium range coverage, but didn't spada provide that pretty well? 40km is more like short range not medium, considering long range is 100km+ S200/300/400 etc

While the Spada is a slightly better system in certain respects to this system so this basically covers up the bases and areas left by the inability to afford more SPADA batteries.
 
. . . . . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom