F-22Raptor
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2014
- Messages
- 16,980
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Wrong, 50% of funding comes from ESA and also the same amount of the tech and individual parts. Stop to steal others works.
It is not NASA space telescope. Its that easy.
The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is expected to cost NASA $9.7 billion over 24 years. Of that amount, $8.8 billion was spent on spacecraft development between 2003 and 2021; $861 million is planned to support five years of operations. Adjusted for inflation to 2020 dollars, the lifetime cost to NASA will be approximately $10.8 billion.
That is only NASA’s portion. The European Space Agency provided the Ariane 5 launch vehicle and two of the four science instruments for an estimated cost of €700 million. The Canadian Space Agency contributed sensors and scientific instrumentation, which cost approximately CA$200 million.
This places the James Webb Space Telescope among the most expensive scientific platforms in history, comparable only to the Hubble Space Telescope and the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.
https://www.planetary.org/articles/cost-of-the-jwst
Europe provided two instruments and the Ariane 5 launcher, but as I said the vast majority of development, integration, and testing was done in the US at NASA facilities.
And the majority of the project was funded by the US taxpayer. It’s a NASA telescope.
Perhaps you can enumerate the 50% of tech that came from ESA which you claim has been stolen.
The Ariane launcher was the overwhelming part of ESA's contribution.
Scientists either side of the Atlantic would never demean themselves bickering over what is a petty layman's injured ego.
You will see no European SCIENTIST talk such rubbish.
We are all delighted, excited and await the unfurling. All other petty concerns are for the hoi polloi.
ESA funded 50% of this project? Since when?