What's new

Narendra Modi: People's choice as PM of India?

Android

BANNED
Joined
Sep 29, 2011
Messages
4,872
Reaction score
-4
Country
India
Location
India
Last week, just for fun, i ran a simple poll on my public Facebook page. The question i asked was simple. Who should be India's PM? The choices were simple too - Rahul Gandhi, Narendra Modi and none of the above. There was no intention to imply any bias. Over 10,000 votes were polled. Rahul Gandhi received 5% of the votes. Narendra Modi had 82%, beating the crown prince an astonishing 16 times; 13% of the voters wanted neither.

No, i am not implying this is India's verdict. In fact, it could be far from the national consensus, as Facebook is a highly skewed demographic of younger, affluent and more educated Indians. As some say, many people on Facebook don't even bother to vote. Also, Modi has some fervent supporters , who rush to support him in times of need such as this poll. Hence, i would take the results with a huge pinch of Gujarat-made salt.

However, to ignore these numbers completely will also be foolish. Modi always had some sort of a fan following in cyberspace, but a 16-to-1 lead is a staggering one. This means his fan base has increased dramatically in the last two years. Rahul Gandhi is a far better known national brand, and is younger, better looking, suave and aspirational in some ways. Then why are the youth of this country not rooting for him? And if Modi is as much of a demon as some say, why do people vote for him? What has led to his rise? And more importantly, can he make the switch from ruling Gujarat and Cyber Pradesh to ruling the 28 states?

The first, the decline of Rahul Gandhi is easy to answer. Hyped up immensely by the English-speaking media and any Congressman who wanted to ingratiate the family, Rahul entered politics with massive expectations. He also entered at the time when the Congress was at its evilest best - covering up huge scams, protecting all corrupt people , crushing anti-corruption crusaders, demonstrating hubris and showing arrogance. Rahul hid every time this happened. The Congress calculated that the people who were aware of what is going on were far outnumbered by the ignorant ones in this country, and so none of the criticism mattered.:hitwall:

Silence towards criticism is normally a good strategy, but only if the criticism is unfounded. The Congress was morally wrong, and refused to accept or amend any of that. The Lokpal bill is forgotten and the slow judicial system is being used to their full advantage. In all this, to expect Rahul Gandhi to somehow shine and have educated Indians root for him is a bit much.

Rahul has also suffered due to a cultural shift in Indians. While still enamored by dynasty, the educated set is questioning the sense of entitlement more than ever before. Rather than 'of course he deserves it' , it is now 'has he lived up to what he has been given' . With no real track record besides hiding whenever there is a national crisis, Rahul has a long way to go if he wants to win the trust of the educated . Today, let's face it, it is just not cool to support Rahul Gandhi amongst the youth. The Congress, if and when it decides to be less arrogant, needs to think hard about this issue. One tip: clean up your dirty act, rather than keeping Rahul away from it.

Narendra Modi: People's choice as PM of India? - The Economic Times
 
.
This man definitely will bring some fresh air in indian politics after the scam hit UPA regime. I have doubt rahul can make any difference.:undecided: It will be nice to see a hang parliament next time with maya and mamta fighting to be PM.:hitwall:
 
.
Unfortunately, India has no presidential system. If it had, Vajpayee would have become the leader again in 2004. It simply doesn't matter who is popular; people just don't vote that way. The party (& allies) matters & if a party had support of the type seen above, that might have counted for something. Not this.
 
. .
India has a fake democracy.

Majority of Indians live in villages, many of them are illiterate, they vote on basis of caste and religion.

Where votes are bought by money, how can you call it a democracy?
 
.
The Congress calculated that the people who were aware of what is going on were far outnumbered by the ignorant ones in this country, and so none of the criticism mattered.
i am a bit worried by reading this line the voting system should be changed in india i think only educated people should be allowed to vote
 
.
India has a fake democracy.

Majority of Indians live in villages, many of them are illiterate, they vote on basis of caste and religion.

Where votes are bought by money, how can you call it a democracy?

While the urban people especially the educated elite treat the election day as an unofficial holiday, the illiterate villagers go out, stand in the sun and vote. So yes, people gets the government that they deserve.

i am a bit worried by reading this line the voting system should be changed in india i think only educated people should be allowed to vote

Education is not a barrier to ignorance or corruption or incompetence.
 
. .
Unfortunately, India has no presidential system. If it had, Vajpayee would have become the leader again in 2004. It simply doesn't matter who is popular; people just don't vote that way. The party (& allies) matters & if a party had support of the type seen above, that might have counted for something. Not this.

Why can't India change to a presidential one.
 
.
While the urban people especially the educated elite treat the election day as an unofficial holiday, the illiterate villagers go out, stand in the sun and vote. So yes, people gets the government that they deserve.

Is that all? Its not about how many go to vote and how many dont?

Its all about why you vote?

Some people vote for money, some people vote based on caste and religion.

Can this be called a meaningful democracy?
 
.
i am a bit worried by reading this line the voting system should be changed in india i think only educated people should be allowed to vote
When an uneducated person goes to vegetable market and sees the market is under fire, he has every right to express his frustration in the ballot box.
 
.
The problem is internet population in India is always pro BJP and extreme right wing. They entitled their opinions in democracy. But when you talk about actual India's fabric you know most of the voters never logged in on internet. Actual voters always wants secular, integrated government and PM. Here Congress won all the brownie points. Atal Bihari Vajpayee is one example of liberal and integrated leader.Even Muslims believed and liked him due to his thinking. BJP must have to promote someone like Vajpayee to be in power. Modi could not be PM of the nation. Only a miracle give him a chance.
 
.
He can never become PM, he is a good administrator for sure, but he does not go along well with others. He is very arrogant as well, not a good national leader.
 
.
From the development point of view modi has done a remarkable job and Gujrat is still progressing to heights. if he dis-associates him self from the right wings then his chances will be on a positive side.

My own state of Goa people including my self voted for BJP Only on the condition that rightwings or extremist from any religion should not be entertained if BJP comes to power,the reason is developement along with communal harmony is wat is expected from a common man . and so far Parrikar has been doing a great job in both . thats the way it should go
 
.
From the development point of view modi has done a remarkable job and Gujrat is still progressing to heights. if he dis-associates him self from the right wings then his chances will be on a positive side.

My own state of Goa people including my self voted for BJP Only on the condition that rightwings or extremist from any religion should not be entertained if BJP comes to power,the reason is developement along with communal harmony is wat is expected from a common man . and so far Parrikar has been doing a great job in both . thats the way it should go
slap ... slap slap.. slap slap slap...
good ones by fazlu to pakistanis.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom