What's new

Nankana Sahib Altercation: News & Discussions

.
Lol. That is not strawman argument. This is

"Hey guys, this an example of rape in India. So all 1.3 billion Indians rape all the time."

That is why you are uneducated madrassa chap.

You know what, you a right.
I was wrong and I apologize.

Your argument wasn't a straw man...... it was actually a red herring!

And my comment on rape wasn't a straw man as well since I didn't make an argument.
I just stated a fact... a fact that statistical rapist like you don't like to hear :toast_sign:
 
.
Have you looked at the Nankana video? Do you think any girl would like to be part of that guy's family who swears at Sikhs, calls for destruction of their holiest place and building a mosque there? I mean is the girl also deaf, mute and blind?
So you're assuming baselessly that the girl forcefully converted why do you not thinks that the girl happily embrace to Islam to get the boy, and tell how many Masjids build in the place of Mandirs, please give me one example, we are not India
 
.
And thus they will be resolved as per the constitution. Correct?
Nope. The ayodhya appeals have already been summarily dismissed. Indian SC is as pointless as Pakistani SC. Congrats on a highly functional judiciary that simply finds loopholes through which it can repeat the Hindutva mantra.
 
.
That's how they like to paint Hindus.

One incident of a muslim man being lynched = All Hindus are lynchers, rapists, criminals

But when a terrorist incident happens = Oh yea he was not a muslim. He doesn't represent our religion

Two faced!



@Protest_again He is another example of two faced people.

Interesting that you interpreted "Indian" as "Hindu"
Just goes to show what your end goal is.

Two faced?
I openly call you rapists and street shitters.
That's as once face as you can get :angel:
 
.
I don't know.
I just know that they never lied about 350 killed or f16 shot down :rofl:

Haha I didn't bring that up because they did say 2 planes went down :lol:

So you're assuming baselessly that the girl forcefully converted why do you not thinks that the girl happily embrace to Islam to get the boy, and tell how many Masjids build in the place of Mandirs, please give me one example, we are not India

Let me give you one great example:

Babri Masjid was built when Babur razed the Ram Temple in Ayodhya and built a mosque on top to shame Hindus.
 
.
You know what, you a right.
I was wrong and I apologize.

Your argument wasn't a straw man...... it was actually a red herring!

And my comment on rape wasn't a straw man as well since I didn't make an argument.
I just stated a fact... a fact that statistical rapist like you don't like to hear :toast_sign:
No point arguing. He thinks Indian islamophobia is ok because everyone in Europe does it too. He has his validation to fire headshots at Muslims.
 
.
So it's not about whether something is constitutional law or not - what matters is whether the law being brought into effect is acceptable or not. If minority basic rights are not protected, then your majoritarian government has failed, regardless of how they came into power.
Tough luck. That is how our constitution is. And constitution is supreme in India whether one likes it it or not. World over all democracies are majoritarian. That is because the country is of majority. The country's ethos, culture, values come from majority.
 
.
Only thing that needs to be done is the creation of Khalistan in india.

only Khalistan will provide platform for Sikhs to raise their political voice and settle such petty issues without involving rapist nation of India.

referendum 2020 is coming please support and donate as much as possible so Sikhs can live in dignity in their own country.

I am donating as much as I can ...

spread the word ...

https://referendum2020.org/
 
.
No point arguing. He thinks Indian islamophobia is ok because everyone in Europe does it too. He has his validation to fire headshots at Muslims.
oh I am not arguing for him.
I am just having fun calling out Indians for all the street shitting and raping they do.
This is more for me then him :D
 
.
So it's not about whether something is constitutional law or not - what matters is whether the law being brought into effect is acceptable or not. If minority basic rights are not protected, then your majoritarian government has failed, regardless of how they came into power.
Rule of majority. Just as predicted. If tomorrow a law is passed to allow lynchings it will become legal no matter what someone says and Bhakts will say it is now in their constitution and completely legal.
 
.
You know what, you a right.
I was wrong and I apologize.

Your argument wasn't a straw man...... it was actually a red herring!

And my comment on rape wasn't a straw man as well since I didn't make an argument.
I just stated a fact... a fact that statistical rapist like you don't like to hear :toast_sign:
Lol. You call me rapist yet you want me to take you as a sane mind. Man, you are retarded. That is for sure.
 
.
Let me give you one great example:

Babri Masjid was built when Babur razed the Ram Temple in Ayodhya and built a mosque on top to shame Hindus.
You have no proofs that there were RAM MANDIR in place of Babari Masjid, and extremist Hindus are master on manipulating/Changing your own history
 
.
Tough luck. That is how our constitution is. And constitution is supreme in India whether one likes it it or not. World over all democracies are majoritarian. That is because the country is of majority. The country's ethos, culture, values come from majority.
If you're secular, you have to protect minority rights. Simple. That's actually how secularism works the world over. India claims it is secular yet codified law and constitution that favour Hindus. Which is it then? Secular or Hindutva state?
 
.
Glad to see this nutcase arrested. We shouldn't let nobody's come in and harm communal peace in our country. Right across the border those people are heading the government. Pshh..
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom