N-capable sub-launched missile operationalised, India in select triad club

[jaiind]

Making its mark as a military superpower in the Southeast Asia region, India has finally operationalised its first home-grown nuclear capable Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM), after nearly two decades of its development. This makes India the sixth in the world to have a credible triad of nuclear-enabled missiles that can be fired from land, air and undersea.

Kept under wraps for years and inducted in the Navy a couple of months ago, the SLBM, code-named ‘B-05’, was secretly test-fired back-to-back from indigenously-built nuclear-powered submarine INS Arihant off the Vizag coast on August 11 and 12. An official associated with the mission on Sunday told TNIE three rounds of the world-class missile were tested during the first-phase user trial and it was a roaring success. Two tests were conducted on August 11, and one was done the next day.

All three missiles were fired from the submarine, nearly 20-m deep in the sea, about 10-km off the Vizag coast. It perfectly followed the pre-designated trajectory before zeroing in on the target with high accuracy, reaching close to zero circular error probability,” the official confirmed over the phone from New Delhi.

Fire Power

Operational range -750 km
Length - 10 metre
Width - 1 metre
Weight - 10 tonne
Warhead - 1,000 kg
Engine - Two-stage solid-fuelled
Best in this class in the world
Not easy to be tracked and destroyed by enemies

http://defencenews.in/article.aspx?id=570106

 

[AUz]

military 'superpower'

hindus literally have won no major military conflict in history...loss, loss, and more loss. But yeah, military superpower

(inferiority complex stricken poor hindutvas incoming with 71 references of a CIVIL WAR to prove how hindus have a military heritage ....by same token, Rwandans also have a great "military" heritage because their "victory" also came in civil wars )

hindus have same 'military heritage' as sub-Saharan Africans---Civil wars, no history altering grand military victory or even participation in one, and few notable/brave military men like Shaka Zulu etc.

While Muslims have the military heritage match only by Europeans----world conquerers and global superpowers of their era! History of fighting in, and winning, history-changing grand military conflicts on multiple continents. Producing some of the greatest-ever undefeated military tacticians/generals (eg: Khalid), especially cavalry commanders, of history. Also, some of the most brutal conquerors too (Timur for one).

 

[Mustang06]

military 'superpower'

hindus literally have won no major military conflict in history...loss, loss, and more loss. But yeah, military superpower

(inferiority complex stricken poor hindutvas incoming with 71 references of a CIVIL WAR to prove how hindus have a military heritage ....by same token, Rwandans also have a great "military" heritage because their "victory" also came in civil wars )

hindus have same 'military heritage' as sub-Saharan Africans---Civil wars, no history altering grand military victory or even participation in one, and few notable/brave military men like Shaka Zulu etc.

While Muslims have the military heritage match only by Europeans----world conquerers and global superpowers of their era! History of fighting in, and winning, history-changing grand military conflicts on multiple continents. Producing some of the greatest-ever undefeated military tacticians/generals (eg: Khalid), especially cavalry commanders, of history. Also, some of the most brutal conquerors too (Timur for one).

Such a nice post from a senior member!
Keep it up.

 

[axisofevil]

military 'superpower'

hindus literally have won no major military conflict in history...loss, loss, and more loss. But yeah, military superpower

(inferiority complex stricken poor hindutvas incoming with 71 references of a CIVIL WAR to prove how hindus have a military heritage ....by same token, Rwandans also have a great "military" heritage because their "victory" also came in civil wars )

hindus have same 'military heritage' as sub-Saharan Africans---Civil wars, no history altering grand military victory or even participation in one, and few notable/brave military men like Shaka Zulu etc.

While Muslims have the military heritage match only by Europeans----world conquerers and global superpowers of their era! History of fighting in, and winning, history-changing grand military conflicts on multiple continents. Producing some of the greatest-ever undefeated military tacticians/generals (eg: Khalid), especially cavalry commanders, of history. Also, some of the most brutal conquerors too (Timur for one).

When nations fell to Islam, forever erasing their identity. India stands among the very, very few that stand here today!

 

[Khatri_pune]

congrats to IN. lets now prepare for K4....

 

[Mrc]

reaching close to zero circular error probability,”

What a claim.... wow...

 

[$@rJen]

its a good dev. but We need to operationalize K4 soon as possible for any credible deterrence. K15 with just 750KM range is only symbolic

 

[Novice09]

military 'superpower'

hindus literally have won no major military conflict in history...loss, loss, and more loss. But yeah, military superpower

(inferiority complex stricken poor hindutvas incoming with 71 references of a CIVIL WAR to prove how hindus have a military heritage ....by same token, Rwandans also have a great "military" heritage because their "victory" also came in civil wars )

hindus have same 'military heritage' as sub-Saharan Africans---Civil wars, no history altering grand military victory or even participation in one, and few notable/brave military men like Shaka Zulu etc.

While Muslims have the military heritage match only by Europeans----world conquerers and global superpowers of their era! History of fighting in, and winning, history-changing grand military conflicts on multiple continents. Producing some of the greatest-ever undefeated military tacticians/generals (eg: Khalid), especially cavalry commanders, of history. Also, some of the most brutal conquerors too (Timur for one).

Difference between the Hindus and Muslim is this...

Prathvi Raj Chauhan defeated the sultan of Ghazni... but showed mercy and left him with fines...

But when Md. Ghori -edited - defeated him by attacking him at night... he punctured both his eyes and took him to Ghazni as a prisoner... where the brave Prathvi Raj Chauhan killed him by using a bow and arrow...

Oh you brave Pakistani, your military and government denied to accept the mortal remains of brave soldiers who died in Kargil... you 90000 soldiers were used tp repair roads in India...

We lost on negotiation table what our military won in war...

Hindus never attacked anyone they mostly defended their motherland... and even the great march by Sikandar was halted by Hindus...

 

[AUz]

Difference between the Hindus and Muslim is this...

Prathvi Raj Chauhan defeated the sultan of Ghazni... but showed mercy and left him with fines...

But when Md. Ghazni defeated him by attacking him at night... he punctured both his eyes and took him to Ghazni as a prisoner... where the brave Prathvi Raj Chauhan killed him by using a bow and arrow...

Oh you brave Pakistani, your military and government denied to accept the mortal remains of brave soldiers who died in Kargil... you 90000 soldiers were used tp repair roads in India...

We lost on negotiation table what our military won in war...

Hindus never attacked anyone they mostly defended their motherland... and even the great march by Sikandar was halted by Hindus...

These are typical excuses of losers of history. Sub-saharan Africans have exactly the same type of reasons to hide thier own incompetency and weakness

How was that Babur....a Muslim general with a small army...was able to defeat entire hindu might and take over Delhi and beyond, and held it to establish an empire? Yes, because Babur was a far superior general and his Army was far more technological advance and tactically sound. Just like today's Western armies are against non-Western armies. There's no excuse in history. You either win, or you lose. History does not care about excuses.

Babur's victory laid the foundations of long-term Muslim rule of Mughals in India---and today, indian subcontinent is home to nearly 500 million+ Muslims and a nuclear-armed Muslim power that played a fundamental role in the eventual defeat of Soviets in Afghan Jihad. While you keep on making excuses, the history marches on and the winners of history keep going forward----whether it were Muslims before or Chinese/westerners today---but you, you would always remain insignificant and riled up in your own vedic mythology that nobody outside of UP gives a sh!t about.

Poor hindutvas....so desperate and losers of history. Couldn't gain anything ever!

 

[AyanRay]

These are typical excuses of losers of history. Sub-saharan Africans have exactly the same type of reasons to hide thier own incompetency and weakness

How was that Babur....a Muslim general with a small army...was able to defeat entire hindu might and take over Delhi and beyond, and held it to establish an empire? Yes, because Babur was a far superior general and his Army was far more technological advance and tactically sound. Just like today's Western armies are against non-Western armies. There's no excuse in history. You either win, or you lose. History does not care about excuses.

Babur's victory laid the foundations of long-term Muslim rule of Mughals in India---and today, indian subcontinent is home to nearly 500 million+ Muslims and a nuclear-armed Muslim power that played a fundamental role in the eventual defeat of Soviets in Afghan Jihad. While you keep on making excuses, the history marches on and the winners of history keep going forward----whether it were Muslims before or Chinese/westerners today---but you, you would always remain insignificant and riled up in your own vedic mythology that nobody outside of UP gives a sh!t about.

Poor hindutvas....so desperate and losers of history. Couldn't gain anything ever!

Dude, are you seriously celebrating the fact that the Afgans, the Mongols came to your land, raped your mom's and sisters and converted your ancestors? The Hindus- who were massacared were your ancestors too, wake up.

If you really want to know how religion is spread, learn from India. Bhuddhism spread to China, Japan and other South East Asian countries and not a drop of blood was split. Unlike Europe or the Middle east, people in India adopted the different branches of Dharmic religion as per their choice and happily co-excisted.

 

[AUz]

Dude, are you seriously celebrating the fact that the Afgans, the Mongols came to your land, raped your mom's and sisters and converted your ancestors? The Hindus- who were massacared were your ancestors too, wake up.

Unlike your mythical self-fellating narrative, pick up some history books....even those written by credible Indian authors. There are next to none reports of mass force conversions or mass rape for that matter by invading Islamic forces.

Islam spread to South Asia via Sufi Saints and even today, the largest school of thoughts in the subcontinent are Barelwis, Sufis, and Deobandis----all descendants from the great Islamic scholarly orders and not "forced conversion via r@pe"

And my ancestors might have been Hindus---but Thank God I am not. Most likely my ancestors were "low caste" hindus living worst than animals and getting pissed on by 'Brahmins'....They left that disgusting, backward religion and join the enlightened Islam. And look at me today, I'm shitting on poor Brahmins online and they can't do shit. I talk smack like this in real life too and timit Brahmin indians can't do cr@p against me.

If it was not for Islam---I might have been a "low caste" india regarded untouchable by the same people i OWN now on regular basis

So yeah, Thank God for Islam!

Anways, ya'll can stop quoting me now. I'm moving on from this thread..

 

[Crystal-Clear]

When nations fell to Islam, forever erasing their identity. India stands among the very, very few that stand here today!

lolx nobody tries to remove hindus . (it would be easy to do that at that time ) .

 

[Novice09]

These are typical excuses of losers of history. Sub-saharan Africans have exactly the same type of reasons to hide thier own incompetency and weakness

How was that Babur....a Muslim general with a small army...was able to defeat entire hindu might and take over Delhi and beyond, and held it to establish an empire? Yes, because Babur was a far superior general and his Army was far more technological advance and tactically sound. Just like today's Western armies are against non-Western armies. There's no excuse in history. You either win, or you lose. History does not care about excuses.

Babur's victory laid the foundations of long-term Muslim rule of Mughals in India---and today, indian subcontinent is home to nearly 500 million+ Muslims and a nuclear-armed Muslim power that played a fundamental role in the eventual defeat of Soviets in Afghan Jihad. While you keep on making excuses, the history marches on and the winners of history keep going forward----whether it were Muslims before or Chinese/westerners today---but you, you would always remain insignificant and riled up in your own vedic mythology that nobody outside of UP gives a sh!t about.

Poor hindutvas....so desperate and losers of history. Couldn't gain anything ever!

It depends upon the philosophy... we have people of all religion and sects in India... and except MUSLIMS, you never hear anyone else fighting with each other... You know why...

 

[Osiris]

military 'superpower'

hindus literally have won no major military conflict in history...loss, loss, and more loss. But yeah, military superpower

(inferiority complex stricken poor hindutvas incoming with 71 references of a CIVIL WAR to prove how hindus have a military heritage ....by same token, Rwandans also have a great "military" heritage because their "victory" also came in civil wars )

hindus have same 'military heritage' as sub-Saharan Africans---Civil wars, no history altering grand military victory or even participation in one, and few notable/brave military men like Shaka Zulu etc.

While Muslims have the military heritage match only by Europeans----world conquerers and global superpowers of their era! History of fighting in, and winning, history-changing grand military conflicts on multiple continents. Producing some of the greatest-ever undefeated military tacticians/generals (eg: Khalid), especially cavalry commanders, of history. Also, some of the most brutal conquerors too (Timur for one).

So you Pakistanis, now gonna claim the victories for all the Muslims, through out the history.

Perhaps that stems from the fact, that you Pakistani have not even won even a single war since your inception.

 

[sathya]

Not just that missile..

SAAW missile was tested .

Helena was also tested..

Kudos to DRDO ..