we are not discussing partition formula, everyone know what went on in later stages, and how exactly did the princely states, and potuguese or french colonies were confiscated... fair enough that newly born union of india expanded its territory...
the points I raised are constitutional, legal and technical...
how does that justify his governor generalship over newly born India ?
all this proves last part argument gives the view that you were not prepared to be given independence,
what you have said, this is no defence of how and when india exactly got independence constitutionally...